Application of continuous positive airway pressure in the delivery room: a multicenter randomized clinical trial

This study evaluated whether the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the delivery room alters the need for mechanical ventilation and surfactant during the first 5 days of life and modifies the incidence of respiratory morbidity and mortality during the hospital stay. The study was a multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted in five public university hospitals in Brazil, from June 2008 to December 2009. Participants were 197 infants with birth weight of 1000-1500 g and without major birth defects. They were treated according to the guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics (APP). Infants not intubated or extubated less than 15 min after birth were randomized for two treatments, routine or CPAP, and were followed until hospital discharge. The routine (n=99) and CPAP (n=98) infants studied presented no statistically significant differences regarding birth characteristics, complications during the prenatal period, the need for mechanical ventilation during the first 5 days of life (19.2 vs 23.4%, P=0.50), use of surfactant (18.2 vs 17.3% P=0.92), or respiratory morbidity and mortality until discharge. The CPAP group required a greater number of doses of surfactant (1.5 vs 1.0, P=0.02). When CPAP was applied to the routine group, it was installed within a median time of 30 min. We found that CPAP applied less than 15 min after birth was not able to reduce the need for ventilator support and was associated with a higher number of doses of surfactant when compared to CPAP applied as clinically indicated within a median time of 30 min.

Uso de CPAP nasal en el largo plazo en síndrome de apnea-hipopnea del sueño / Long-term continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use in obstructive sleep apnea

Background: The use of CPAP is the conventional therapy for the Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS). Aim To establish the proportion of OSAS patients with CPAP indication who use it in the long-term and to determine predictive factors of adherence. Patients and Methods: Structured survey through personal interview or phone call, applied to all patients who had polisomnographically documented OSAS and CPAP titration at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Sleep Disorders Center between January 1998 and November 2001. Patients were divided in "Permanent Users" (Group I) and "Non Users" (Group II). Results: Of 440 patients that fulfilled inclusion criteria, 162 (32.8 percent) answered the survey. Seventy percent (114/162) of these patients had used CPAP and 86 percent (98/114) continued to use it at the time of the interview, with a mean follow-up of 12.3 months (Group I 60.5 percent of the interviewed population). Group II included 64 patients (39.5 percent of the interviewed patients). Among the latter, 25 percent (16/64) stopped using CPAP due to intolerance, 25 percent (16/64) could not use it because of economical restrictions, 20.5 percent (13/64) preferred other therapies and 29.5 percent (15/64) merely refused treatment. Predictors of long-term use of CPAP were number of respiratory events (p <0.01), hypersomnolence (p <0.01) and age (p =0.03). Conclusions: Approximately two thirds of patients with OSAS, with an indication for CPAP, continue to use this therapy in the long term in a Chilean population. This figure is similar to other reports from abroad. It is also possible to identify predictive factors for CPAP discontinuation in this population.