Laparoscopic cecectomy for diseases of the appendix and cecum

Introduction: The cecum is the first part of the large bowel. Cecectomy is a sufficient treatment for some patients, avoiding overtreatment by ileocolic resection. Purpose:The goal of this study was to review a surgeon's experience with laparoscopic cecectomy and provide a technical video demonstration of this uncommon operation. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all consecutive patients treated with laparoscopic cecectomy over a 16-year period. All operations were performed using a 3-trocar technique. The cecum was transected with 1 to 2 firings of a 60 millimeters linear stapler, preserving the ileocecal valve and ascending colon. Results: 19 patients were identified including 12 females (63.2%). Median age was 42 years (range 16-84). Indication for surgery included appendiceal pathology in 12 patients (63.2%) and cecal abnormality in 7 (38.9%). There was no conversion to open surgery. Median intraoperative blood loss was 25 ml (range 0-150 ml) and no patient received a blood transfusion. No intraoperative or postoperative complication was noted. The median length stay was 1 day (range 0-6). Readmission rate was 0%. Final appendiceal histopathology revealed acute/chronic appendicitis in 5 patients, mucinous cystadenoma in 4 patients. Cecal histopathology revealed adenoma in 4 patients. Median follow-up was 16 months (range 4-53). Conclusions: Laparoscopic cecectomy is a sufficient treatment for some patients with benign conditions of the appendix and cecum. It carries minimal morbidity. It should be considered as an alternative to segmental bowel resection in a select group of patients. (AU)

Endoscopic Cecectomy with Hybrid Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) in Canine Models

PURPOSE: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new operation technique that utilizes natural orifices of the patient's body with the intention to puncture hollow viscera in order to insert an endoscope into a peritoneal cavity for incisionless surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of endoscopic cecectomy through the rectum in one dog and the vagina in another dog. METHODS: This study was performed in two beagle dogs for rectal and vaginal approaches. A five-milimeter trocar was inserted into the abdominal cavity by the Hasson method and intra-abdominal pressure was maintained at 5 mmHg with CO2. After pneumoperitoneum was accomplished, the rectum or vagina was incised with a needle knife and a one-channel gastric endoscope was inserted into the abdominal cavity. Counter-traction was performed using a laparoscopic grasper introduced via the 5 mm trocar in the umbilicus. The cecum was dissected from the base by using a needle knife with the aid of laparoscopic counter-traction. The resected cecum was retrieved through the anus or vagina without pouch bag. The incised rectum was closed by using 90-degree endoclips whereas the incised vagina was not repaired. RESULTS: Cecectomies were successfully performed with both transrectal and transvaginal routes. Both cases had no complication and recovered from surgery uneventfully. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic cecectomy with hybrid NOTES are feasible and safe. With the improvement of surgical experiences and further instrumental development, NOTES can be one option for human intestinal surgery.

Surgical Management of Cecal Diverticulitis Detected during Appendectomy

PURPOSE: Acute diverticulitis of the right colon is not rare in Korea and the clinical presentation is indistin guishable from acute appendicitis. Cecal diverticulitis has led to a controversy in the management of disease. METHODS: Thirty-one cases of acute cecal diverticulitis who underwent operation for suspected acute appendicitis were reviewed retrospectively from January 1995 to December 1998. RESULTS: There were 17 men & 14 women. Ages ranged from 9 to 69 (mean: 37.5) years. All patients presented with signs and symptoms as acute appendicitis. All patients were explored through a transverse incision in the right lower quadrant under the impression of acute appendicitis. An appendectomy and drainage was performed in 13 patients, and resection of the lesion was performed in 18 patients (12 ileocecal resection, one partial cecectomy including appendix, one partial cecectomy and an appendectomy, 4 diverticulectomy and appendectomy), depending on the location of diverticulitis, severity of inflammation, and surgeon. Staples (TA(R), GIA(R)) were used in all cecal resection cases except for diverticulectomy. Five complications were observed, 3 in cecal resection cases (one wound seroma, one wound infection and one bleeding), and 2 in appendectomy and drainage cases (two wound infections). There was no postoperative mortality. The average length of the postoperative stay was 10.2 days in the drainage group and 8.8 days in the cecal resection group. Two recurrences were observed. One was the patient who had diverticulectomy performed. The other was a patient who had had appendectomy and drainage. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the preferred surgical management of an acute cecal diverticulitis operated for a presumed acute appendicitis is cecectomy using staples depending on its location and severity of inflammation. It was safe, relatively easy to do through the same incision, and could be a definitive treatment.