Break the domestic public hospital clinical research evaluation system under the background of"five only" / 现代医院

Objective The purpose of this article is to summarize and review the current status of the construction of clinical research evaluation systems in domestic public hospitals,identify existing problems in the evaluation system,and propose development strategies and suggestions.Methods Retrieved relevant articles,dissertations and policies from the past five years(2018-2022),screened the titles,viewed the full texts of 52 selected papers and their references,and summarized them.Results The"five-only"indicators have long been an important indicator for evaluating clinical research in public hospitals,but in today's scientific research environment and policy environment,the"five-only"evaluation system has revealed its utilitarian draw-backs and gradually evolved into a hindrance to scientific research.It is urgent to break through the"five-only"orientation and establish a clinical research evaluation system oriented towards"transforming and applying transformation of scientific research achievements".Conclusion The evaluation system for clinical research should break the previous"five-only"evaluation model based on quantity-oriented scientific research evaluation.We can draw on the framework of the research output,influence,and environment indicators in the UK's REF Excellence Framework model,combine the American APT system and the Chinese STEM indicator dimensions,explore multi-outcome evaluation,integrate developmental indicators,and continuously improve the indica-tor system and application methods in practice to promote the development of clinical research in public hospitals.

Trend analysis of the clinical research evaluation / 中华医学科研管理杂志

Objective:At present, the reform direction is to break all kinds of " only" (particular standard-centric) academic evaluation, clinical research evaluation is also in urgent need for more optimization. This study focuses on clinical research, analyzes the current situation and the key points of evaluation in the future. Meanwhile, calls for more attention to broader content in clinical research.Methods:Through the analysis of clinical research status, combined with many years of medical management practice. This study analyzes the status and role of clinical research in the whole medical research, the content and current situation of clinical research evaluation in China and abroad, and the trend of clinical research evaluation. Finally, suggestions on the clinical research are proposed.Results:Clinical research evaluation should pay more attention to the social benefits, the ability to solve complicated diseases, and the international influence in the research field.Conclusions:Hospitals and clinical research teams should have systematic layout and clear research direction, continuously improve scientific research capacity in clinical work, have professional technical support team, as well as focus on the quality and standard of clinical research. The evaluation of clinical research should pay more attention to its essential attributes.