The Frequency Unexpected Antibodies at Kyungpook National University Hospital / 대한수혈학회지

BACKGROUND: Unexpected antibody screening and identification tests are very important pre-transfusion tests for preventing transfusion reactions. Nowadays, the column agglutination test is widely used in Korea. The results of many studies that used this method showed the decreased frequency of nonsignificant cold antibodies and an increased frequency of warm antibodies when compared with other studies that used the tube test or the microplate test. This study was performed in order to determine the accurate frequency and distribution of unexpected alloantibody by using the column agglutination test. METHODS: We analyzed the results from 32,218 antibody screening tests with using LISS/Coombs cards and ID-DiaCell I and II for the transfusion candidates and patients with hemolytic anemia who were seen at Kyungpook National University Hospital during a recent eight-year period. RESULTS: According to the results of the antibody screening test, 188 samples (0.58%) out of all 32,218 samples, were shown to be positive. Unexpected alloantibodies were detected in 86 patients (0.27%) with using the antibody identification test. The antibodies that were detected most frequently were anti-E (29 samples), followed by anti-D (8 samples), anti-M (8 samples) and anti-c (7 samples). CONCLUSION: The frequency and distribution of unexpected antibodies at our hospital are similar with those obtained in other Korean studies. The detection rates of warm antibodies, including Rh antibodies, were high. The proportion of Rh antibodies in patients with a gestation history was significantly higher than that in the patients without a gestation history. This study shows once again that pregnancy affects the antibodies and this supports the relationship between pregnancy and antibody formation.

Usefulness of column agglutination test for irregular antibody screening and identification / 대한임상병리학회지

BACKGROUND: Type and screen is recommended for efficient use of blood and reduction in workload in blood bank. Column agglutiation test is standardized and easy to perform, and provide clear and stable reactions that improve the interpretation of results. In this study, we compared column agglutination test(Ortho Diagnostic Systems Inc., USA) with conventional tube test and investigate its usefulness in irregular antibody screening and identification. METHODS: A total 182 samples were screened for irregular antibodies using column agglutination test and conventional tube test. And 18 patient's sera in which irregular antibodies previously screened by both tube and column agglutination tests were identified for irregular antibodies by tube and column agglutination tests. We compared the results of two tests. RESULTS: In the screening test, there was 96.7%(176/182) agreements between column agglutination test and conventional tube test. The column agglutination test showed stronger reactivity than tube test. In the irregular antibody identification, there was 88.8%(16/18) agreement between two tests and disagreement were seen in the identification of anti-P1 and anti-Leb antibodies. CONCLUSION: The results of column agglutination test are objective and superior to the conventional tube test in irregular antibody screening and identification tests. These results suggest that the column agglutination test will be useful and more convenient test in antibody screening and identification.

Discrepant Frequency of Rh Subtype and Kell Blood Group Antigens between Korean Pregnant Women and Their Neonates / 대한수혈학회지

BACKGROUND: The causes of hemolytic disease of the newborn are discrepancies of ABO group, Rh(D) or other RBC antigens. The discrepancies of Rh subgroups except Rh(D) and K typing can be seen rarely. The clinical symptoms of those types are mild and most clinicians have no interest in them. However, there exist some serious cases that need exchange transfusion. For that, we detected Rh subgroup phenotyping and Kell typing in blood obtained from cord and pregnant women and the frequency of discrepancy. METHODS: We examined the cord and mother's blood collected from 317 pregnant women from May to November, 1997. Rh(D) typing was done using slide method with anti-D (Dade, USA), and other Rh subgroup phenotyping using column agglutination test on MicroTyping system with Rh-K gel card (DiaMed, Switzerland). Irregular antibody screening was done in the cases of discrepancy. RESLUTS: The most frequent phenotype of Rh subgroup was CDe (41.3%) and then CcDEe (39.3%), but the K typing showed 0%. 90 cases of 317 pair-samples (28.4%) showed discrepancies between pregnant women and their neonates. The most frequent type of Rh discrepancy was c+E (50%) and then C or E (11.1%). 62 cord samples which obtained from neonates of Kyungpook and Chonnam provinces showed discrepancies, were all negative in the irregular antibody screening test. CONCLUSIONS: Rh subgroup phenotyping and irregular antibody screening in cord blood by column agglutination test is thought to be helpful in early diagnosis and treatment of hemolytic disease of the newborn, as a sufficient amount of cord blood can be collected easily rather than neonatal blood.

Irregular Antibody Screening in Cord Blood by Column Agglutination Test / 대한수혈학회지

BACKGROUND: Irregular antibodies are antibodies that are not regularly present in the serum of particular blood groups and its presence results in many problems including HDN (hemolytic disease of newborn) in transfusion medicine. Column agglutination test was recently introduced and has been widely used for advantages of standardized working procedures, standard reactions, stable reactions for hours and Coombs test without washing steps. We tested irregular antibodies in cord blood by column agglutination test and investigated its incidence and relation with HDN. METHODS: We tested the cord blood collected during delivery from 200 pregnant women. Column agglutination test was done on DiaMed ID MicroTyping System (DiaMed, Switzerland) and both LISS/Coombs and NaCl/Enzyme ID-cards were used. The antibody screening test was done first and antibody identification test was done to positive cases in same way. The cell typing and Rh phenotyping for cord blood of positive cases were also done. RESULTS: 2 cases of 200 samples (1%) were positive in the antibody screening test and each was identified as anti-D and anti-E antibody. CONCLUSIONS: Irregular antibody screening in cord blood by column agglutination test is thought to be helpful in early diagnosis and treatment of HDN.