RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We examined a functional model of acquired capability for suicide, which was elaborated from the “Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide”. METHODS: A total of 6,027 Korean community subjects were recruited from The Korean Epidemiologic Catchment Area study conducted in 2011. The subjects were assessed systematically using the Korean version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview version 2.1, the Korean version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, and the Korean version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. We used structural equation modeling to identify potential factors contributing to a suicide attempt. RESULTS: Most aspects of the model were supported by the data and “the short-term enhancer for the acquired capability for suicide” had direct effects on suicide attempts. However, the suicidal planning effects of “the short-term enhancer for the acquired capability for suicide” were eliminated by the rule of parsimony. CONCLUSION: The main finding was that “the short-term enhancer for the acquired capability for suicide” is relevant to suicide attempts when it's direct, indirect, and reciprocal effects are tested within a more complete system of relationships than found in existing studies. The implications of these findings are discussed with regard to future conceptual work and empirical research.
Assuntos
Adulto , Humanos , Pesquisa Empírica , Transtornos do Humor , Ideação Suicida , SuicídioRESUMO
Las investigaciones acerca de la neurobiología de la violencia apuntan a que existe una alteración relacionada con la corteza prefrontal (CPF). Sin embargo, la mayor parte de los estudios se han llevado a cabo en poblaciones institucionalizadas. Por lo tanto, el objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar el funcionamiento cognitivo de la CPF en sujetos violentos de la población general por medio de una batería neuropsicológica que proporciona 3 índices: dorsolateral, orbitomedial y pre frontal anterior; y demostrar si su desempeño es similar al que se ha encontrado en poblaciones institucionalizadas. Participaron 60 hombres adultos de la Cd. de México que respondieron la escala de Escala agresión Reactiva-Proactiva (Raine, 2006), versión en español (Andreu, Peña & Ramírez, 2009) y fueron divididos en violentos (n=30) y controles (n=30). Se encontraron diferencias sólo en el total orbitomedial mostrando el grupo de violentos el menor desempeño. Los resultados encontrados coinciden con los que se han reportado en la literatura en sujetos institucionalizados en referencia al bajo desempeño orbitomedial, sin embargo se discute el papel que podría jugar el componente antisocial de la personalidad en la conducta violenta y el desempeño neuropsicológico.
Recent neurobiology research about violent behavior points out to the existence of a disorder associated with the prefrontal cortex (PFC). However, most studies are carried out on institutionalized samples. Hence, the aim of the present study was to evaluate cognitive frontal functioning in violent men from a community sample with a neuropsychological battery that measures different prefrontal areas: dorsolateral (working memory and executive functions) orbital (decision making) and medial (inhibition); and to demonstrate if their neuropsychological performance is in any way similar to that found in institutionalized samples. 60 adult male subjects from a community sample of Mexico City participated in this study. Subjects were divided into violent (n=30) and nonviolent (n=30) using a screening questionnaire (Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire; Raine, 2006) in its Spanish adapted version (Andreu, Peña & Ramírez, 2009). We found that violent individuals compared to nonviolent controls exhibited a worse performance in overall tasks, but the only statistical difference we found was in tasks related to the orbitomedial functioning. Our results matched with previous studies carried out on institutionalized samples that referred a low orbitomedial performance; however we discussed the possible role of the antisocial component in violent behavior and neuropsychological performance.
RESUMO
Objective: To test applicability of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in different age groups in urban China, and to develop age norms. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the CES-D was administrated to 16047 community participants with average age of (37.7±21.3) years (age ranged 11～100) in 21 provinces, who were as the norming sample. Criterion validity was tested in 349 psychiatric patients with average age of (32.0±12.1) years (age ranged 16～81) in 4 cities. A subsample (199 workers, 100 col-lege students, and 30 teachers in Beijing, Dongguan, and Baotou) was drawn from the national sample to provide 8 week interval test-retest reliability. Results: The Cronbach α was 0.90 for the scale, and 0.68～0.86 for its fac-tors. The 8 week interval test-retest correlation was 0.49 for the scale (P <0.01) and 0.39～0.51 for factors (P<0.01) . The result of confirmatory factor analysis supported the original 4-factor structure (RMSEA=0.057, CFI =0.976, GFI=0.948) . Patients scored higher than community sample [(21.72±13.39 ) vs.(13.24±10.33),P <0.01], and depression patients scored the highest [(27.82±14.42), P<0.01] . Age difference was signifi-cant. Age groups over 60-year-old scored higher than all the other age groups under 60-year-old (P<0.01). Con-clusion: The Chinese version of CES-D shows good refiability and validity across all ages in urban population-