RESUMO
La atención es definida como un constructo multidimensional, encargado de regular sobre qué estímulos se dirigirán los recursos perceptivos, filtrando información irrelevante con el fin de favorecer la retención de información durante un período antes de actuar sobre ella. La evaluación computarizada de la atención ha ido cobrando relevancia tanto en la investigación como en las prácticas del quehacer profesional. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron: 1) analizar la consistencia interna y la validez concurrente del Test de Atención Infantil 6.0 (tai), versión computarizada; y 2) obtener los valores de referencia preliminares para cada subtest del tai. Los estudios de confiabilidad y validez del tai corresponden a una muestra de 122 escolares de Mendoza (Argentina). Al analizar la consistencia interna se obtuvieron valores satisfactorios para cada uno de los subtests (Test 1, kr 20 = 0.78; Test 2, kr 20 =0.74; Test 3, kr20 = 0.73). Se obtuvieron valores satisfactorios al explorar la estabilidad del instrumento. Al analizar la validez concurrente, los resultados indicaron correlaciones positivas moderadas y significativas (p <0.01) entre el test Caras-R y los subtests 1 y 2 del tai, utiliza-do para evaluar desempeño atencional. Se observaron asociaciones positivas significativas (p <0.01) entre el subtest 3 del tai y el Test de Bloques de Corsi, usado para evaluar memoria de trabajo visoespacial. Estos resultados señalan que el tai, instrumento desarrolla-do para evaluar la atención y memoria de trabajo visuoespacial en escolares, presenta indicadores adecuados de validez y confiabilidad. Se discuten los hallazgos, limitaciones y futuras líneas de investigación.
Attention has been defined as a multidimensional construct, dealing with regulation of which stimuli the perceptual resources are directed to, filtering irrelevant information out to favor the retention of relevant information for a period of time, before acting on it. The computerized evaluation of attention has been gaining relevance both in research and in professional practice. The objectives are: 1) to analyze internal consistency and concurrent validity of the Child Attention Test 6.0 (tai), computerized version 6.0; and, 2) to obtain the preliminary reference values for each of the tai subtests done. The data for the validity and reliability studies of the tai corresponds to a sample of 122 schoolchildren in Mendoza (Argentina). When analyzing the internal consistency, satisfactory values were obtained for each subtest (Test 1, kr 20 = 0.78; Test 2, kr 20 = 0.74; and Test 3, kr 20 = 0.73). Satisfactory values were obtained when exploring the stability of the instrument. For concurrent validity, the results indicate significant moderate positive correlations (p <0.01) between the scores obtained in the Caras-R test and subtests 1 and 2 of the tai, used to evaluate attentional performance. Significant positive associa-tions (p <0.01) were observed between tai subtest 3 and the Corsi Block Test, used to assess visuospatial working memory. These results indicate that the tai, an instrument developed in order to evaluate attention and visuospatial working memory of school children, presents adequate indicators of validity and reliability. The findings, limitations, and future lines of research are discussed
A atenção é definida como um construto multidimensio-nal, responsável por regular quais estímulos os recursos perceptivos irão direcionar, filtrando informações irrelevantes de forma a favorecer a retenção da informação por um período de tempo, antes de agir sobre ela. A avaliação informatizada da atenção vem ganhando relevância tanto na pesquisa quanto na prática profissional. Os objetivos deste estudo foram: 1) analisar a consistência interna e a validade concorrente do Teste de Atenção Infantil 6.0 (tai), versão computadorizada, e 2) obter valores de referência preliminares para cada subteste do tai. Os estudos de confiabilidade e validade do tai correspondem a uma amostra de 122 estudantes de Mendoza (Argentina). Na análise da consistência interna foram obtidos valores satisfatórios para cada um dos subtestes (Teste 1, kr 20 = 0.78; Teste 2, kr20 = 0.74; Teste 3, kr 20 = 0.73). Valores satisfatórios foram obtidos ao explorar a estabilidade do instrumento. Ao analisar a validade concorrente, os resultados indicaram correlações positivas moderadas e significativas (p <0.01) entre o teste Caras-r e os subtestes 1 e 2 do tai, utilizados para avaliar o desempenho atencional. Foram observadas associações positivas significativas (p <0.01) entre o subteste 3 do tai e o Teste em Blocos de Corsi, utilizado para avaliar a memória de trabalho visuoespacial. Esses resultados indicam que o tai, instrumento desenvolvido para avaliar a atenção 3Test de Atención Infantil: análisis de las características psicométricas y valores de referencia preliminaresAvances en Psicología Latinoamericana / Bogotá (Colombia) / Vol. 41(3) / pp. 1-20 / 2023 / ISSNe2145-4515e a memória operacional visuoespacial em estudantes, apresenta indicadores adequados de validade e confiabilidade. As descobertas, limitações e futuras linhas de pesquisa são discutidas.
Assuntos
Humanos , Criança , Comportamento Infantil , Desenvolvimento InfantilRESUMO
La Teoría del Sexismo Ambivalente propone que el sexismo es un constructo multidimensional compuesto por dos tipos de creencias sexistas, unas de carácter hostil y otras de tipo benevolente. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue analizar la estructura factorial del instrumento derivado de esta teoría, su invarianza factorial entre géneros y su relación con la violencia de pareja. Mediante un formulario en internet, 745 participantes de ambos sexos de población general de Argentina, con edades comprendidas entre 18 y 45 años, respondieron el Inventario de Sexismo Ambivalente (ISA) (Glick & Fiske, 1996). El ISA demostró puntuaciones y una estructura factorial invariantes entre hombres y mujeres. La relación entre las puntuaciones en el ISA y la violencia de pareja varió en función del tipo de violencia considerado (amenazas vs. violencia física) y el género del miembro de la pareja. Las puntuaciones en Sexismo Hostil fueron mayores en las mujeres que ejercieron violencia física comparadas con otras mujeres, pero no en los hombres. También fueron superiores en quienes sufrieron esta conducta, tanto hombres como mujeres. Se discuten las implicancias de estos resultados a la luz de estudios previos que emplean el ISA, principalmente en población de habla hispana.
The Ambivalent Sexism Theory proposes that sexism is a multidimensional construct composed of two types of sexist beliefs, on the one hand, hostile and, on the other hand, benevolent. The first refers to negative attitudes towards women as weak and inferior to men, and the second refers to the set of sexist attitudes towards women considering them stereotyped and limited to certain roles (i.e. mother, wife, and housewife). The main objective of this study was to analyse the factor structure and factorial invariance by gender of the instrument derived from this theory and its concurrent validity with a measure of intimate partner physical violence. Another objective of the study was to establish comparisons in ISA scores by gender and cross-culturally. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) (Glick & Fiske, 1996) was answered through an online form by 745 participants of both sexes from an Argentinean general population sample aged between 18 and 45 years old. By means of a confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis the data in this sample showed a good adjustment to the ASI structure proposed by its authors, this is a one-dimensional factor (SH) and three subfactors (protective paternalism, complementary gender differentiation and heterosexual intimacy) that make up the second-order factor SB. This factorial structure remained invariant when discriminating between men and women. The correlation between both factors was robust and significant (r = .68) both in the general sample, and differentiating by gender. The reliability of the factors and subfactors was between a moderate and high level (α = .62 to .91). No significant differences were found between men and women in the mean scores of the ASI factors and subfactors. Approximately 1 in 3 subjects reported having perpetrated or suffered intimate partner physical violence. In general terms, those who have perpetrated or have suffered violence had higher scores in SH and SB that those who did not, but this effect was only significant in the case of women. The relationships found between ASI scores and intimate partner physical violence varied by gender and violence directionality (suffered or perpetrated). The ASI scores were lower in countries close to Argentina probably due to a sample mainly composed by young women with a high education level. Our results support the idea that ambivalent sexism is an invariable transcultural construct between men and women, and that the ISA is avalid and reliable measure in the Argentine population. The limitations of results are discussed and the implications are analyses in light of previous studies using the ASI, mainly in Spanish-speaking population.
RESUMO
@#Introduction: Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) is a tool used to assess the risk of postpartum depression (PPD). In this study we determined the reliability and validity of the Malay version of EPDS when administered at two different time points in the postpartum period. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study design was carried out between May and September 2017 at three government primary healthcare clinics located in Batang Padang district, a suburban area of Perak state in Peninsular Malaysia. We recruited a total of 89 women; 41 women were in the early postpartum period (1-30 days) and 48 women were in the late postpartum period (31-120 days). Cronbach's alpha coefficient, inter-item correlation, and corrected item-total correlation were used to assess the internal consistency. The concurrent validity was assessed using Spearman’s correlation. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 and R 3.4.2. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha for the first and second group was 0.78 and 0.62, respectively, which indicated satisfactory reliability. At both time periods, removing Item 2 from the scale resulted in a significant increase in Cronbach’s alpha (to 0.847 and 0.709, respectively). As expected, the EPDS scores correlated moderately with the BDI-II scores (1−30 days: Spearman's rho = 0.65, p < 0.01; 31−120 days: Spearman's rho = 0.73, p < 0.01). Conclusion: The Malay version of the EPDS is a reliable screening instrument for detecting postpartum depression. It showed reasonability and feasibility and can be used in postpartum clinical settings or for assessing intervention effects in research studies. Furthermore, as our results indicated, removing Item 2 from the Malay version would increase the internal consistency of the EPDS.
RESUMO
The purpose of this study is to analyze the concurrent validity of the psychological variables self-confidence and anxiety among the psychological measurement instruments: Psychological Characteristics Questionnaire related to Sports Performance (CPRD); Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2); and Sports Psychological Inventory LOEHR. For this purpose, a correlational study was conducted between the selected variables and pertinent aspects of the measurement instruments. The study has revealed that the psychological variables self-confidence and anxiety are relevant in all three instruments, although not in all of the selected items.
O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a validade concorrente das variáveis psicológicas de autoconfiança e ansiedade entre os instrumentos de medição psicológica: Questionário de Características Psicológicas relacionadas ao Desempenho Esportivo (CPRD), Inventário de Ansiedade Estado Competitivo-2 (CSAI-2) e Inventário Psicológico Esportivo LOEHR. Para isso foi realizado um estudo de correlação entre os itens selecionados e coincidentes em tais instrumentos. A análise revelou que as variáveis psicológicas autoconfiança e ansiedade guardam relação nos três instrumentos, mas não em todos os itens selecionados.
El objetivo del presente estudio es analizar la validez concurrente de las variables psicológicas autoconfianza y ansiedad entre los instrumentos de medición psicológica: Cuestionario de Características Psicológicas relacionadas con el Rendimiento Deportivo (CPRD), Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2) e Inventario Psicológico Deportivo LOEHR. Para ello, se ha llevado a cabo un estudio correlacional entre los ítems seleccionados y coincidentes en dichos instrumentos. El estudio ha revelado que las variables psicológicas autoconfianza y ansiedad guardan relación en los tres instrumentos, aunque no en todos los ítems seleccionados.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto , Ansiedade , Desempenho Atlético/psicologia , Psicologia Aplicada , EsportesRESUMO
El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo probar las cualidades psicométricas de las escalas PSS-Fa y PSS-Fr (Procidano & Heller, 1983), obteniendo su validez concurrente. El estudio se llevó a cabo en estudiantes mexicanos de nivel universitario con edades de 18 a 31 años. Se calcularon las correlaciones de las escalas de interés con otras variables teóricamente vinculadas al Apoyo Social Percibido como Estrés Percibido (PSS), Optimismo (LOT-R O), Pesimismo (LOT-R P), Estilos de Apego (RQ), Satisfacción en la Vida (SWLS), Número de la red de Apoyo y Satisfacción con la red de apoyo (SSQ6-N y SSQ6-S), Afecto Positivo y Negativo (PANAS-AP y AN), y Deseabilidad Social como variable de control (MC-SDS). También se realizaron comparaciones entre los extremos alto y bajo en apoyo social, y se encontraron diferencias significativas en algunas de las variables criterio. Se concluye que las escalas cuentan con evidencia empírica de su adecuada validez convergente y divergente y su poder discriminante para medir el apoyo social percibido.
The study aimed to test the psychometric qualities of PSS-Fa and PSS-Fr scales (Procidano & Heller, 1983), and their concurrent validity. The sample consisted of college Mexican students ranging from 18 to 31 years of age. In order to determine the concurrent validity, the scales were correlated with other psychological measures theoretically related to the construct of Perceived Social Support, such as Perceived Stress (PSS), Optimism (LOT-R O), Pessimism (LOT-R P), Attachment Styles (RQ), Life Satisfaction (SWLS), Number and Social Supporters Satisfaction (SSQ6-N & SSQ6-S), Positive and Negative Affect (PANAS-PA & NA), and Social Desirability (MCSDS) as a control variable. Finally, extreme (high and low) groups for perceived social support from family and friends were compared in each of the criteria variables and several significant differences were found. Both scales, PSS-Fa & PSS-Fr, were found to have adequate convergent and divergent validity and discriminant power to measure perceived social support.
RESUMO
Este estudio compara el efecto de cuatro métodos de puntuación para la Escala de Depresión del Centro para Estudios Epidemiológicos (CES-D), sobre la fiabilidad, validez concurrente, puntos de corte, sensibilidad, especificidad y fiabilidad de clasificación de la escala. La CES-D fue puntuada utilizando el método "ordinal" convencional, dos métodos binarios ("presencia" y "persistencia" de los síntomas) y un nuevo sistema de puntuación "semanal". A partir de análisis psicométricos y de curvas ROC, realizados sobre una muestra normativa (n=1143) y clínica (n=44), se encontró que los métodos "ordinal" y "semanal" se desempeñan mejor en la detección de depresión. Por otro lado, el método por "persistencia" de los síntomas mostró el peor desempeño. En general, los resultados muestran que el método de puntuación tiene efecto en la fiabilidad y validez de la CES-D.
This study compare the effect of four scoring methods for the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) on score reliability, concurrent validity, cut points, sensibility, specificity and classifica-tion reliability of the scale. The CES-D was scored using the conventional "ordinal" method, two binary methods ("presence" and "persistence" of symptoms) and a new "weekly" scoring system. On the basis of both psychometric analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, performed on normative (n=1143) and clinical (n=44) samples, it was found that the "ordinal" and "weekly" methods performed best in detecting depression. On the other hand, the "persistence" of symptoms method resulted in worse performance. Overall, the results indícate that the scoring method has an effect on the reliability and validity of the CES-D.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/psicologia , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Curva ROC , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Quinientos cincuenta y cuatro niños de población general, de 8 a 12 años, respondieron a la Escala de Ansiedad para Niños de Spence en español (SCAS), al ITA-UNAM, que mide ansiedad y al CES-D, que mide depresión. Se investigó si se confirmaba el modelo estructural de la SCAS hallado por Spence. Mediante análisis confirmatorio, se probaron dos modelos: uno de 38 ítems y otro de 32 ítems, ambos con 6 factores relacionados, englobados bajo un factor de orden superior de ansiedad general. El modelo de 38 ítems se ajustó razonablemente, confirmando el encontrado por Spence. Pero, el modelo de 32 ítems ajustó mejor. Ambos coinciden con los trastornos de ansiedad más comunes clasificados por el DSM-IV-R. Los análisis psicométricos adicionales refuerzan la validez de constructo de la SCAS y muestran una consistencia interna aceptable.
Five hundred and fifty four school children, 8 to 12 years of age, completed the Spanish version of the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS), the ITA-UNAM, which measures anxiety in children, and the CES-D measuring depression. The study investigated the structural model of the SCAS found by Spence. Two models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis: one 38-item and a second 32-item model, both involving 6 related first-order factors loading in a higher-order factor. The 38-item model provided a reasonably good fit, confirming the one reported by Spence. However, the second model provided the best fit of the data. Both models coincide with the most common anxiety disorders classified by the DSM-IV-TR. Further psychometric analyses reinforced construct validity of the SCAS and showed acceptable internal consistency.
RESUMO
Objective To examine the concurrent validity of Peabody'S developmental motor scale number 2(PDMS-2)and Gesell's developmental scales with 1 2 to 30 month-old children with cerebral palsy (CP)and to assess the value of PDMS-2 in measuring motor function in children with CP.Methods Eighty-four children with CP aged 12 to 30 months were assessed with both PDMS-2 and Gesell's developmental scales.The correlation between PDMS-2 gross motor quotients and Gesell gross motor developmental quotients,and be-tween PDMS-2 fine motor quotients and Gesell fine motor developmental quotients were compared using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Results The correlation coefficient between PDMS-2 gross motor quo-tient and the Gesell gross motor developmental quotient was 0.89.Between PDMS-2 fine motor quotient and Gesell's fine motor developmental quotient it was 0.87.The concurrent validities were 0.28 and 0.42 respec-tively. Conclusion PDMS-2 gross motor quotient and Gesell's gross motor developmental quotient are highly correlated,as are PDM S-2 fine motor quotient and Gesell's fine motor developmental quotient.The concurrent validities were between classifications using the PDMS-2 gross motor quotient and Gesell's gross motor develop- mental quotient were weakly correlated,but there was moderate correlation between PDM S-2 fine motor quotientsand Gesell fine gross developmental quotients.There may be limitations in assessing motor function children aged12 to 30 months with cerebral palsy using PDMS-2.
RESUMO
O Teste do Desenho da Figura Humana (DFH) é amplamente utilizado como uma técnica de avaliação do desenvolvimento cognitivo, porém, o reconhecimento da validade deste instrumento ainda hoje não está completo. No Brasil, o Sistema Wechsler de avaliação cognitiva do DFH já foi aprovado pelo Conselho Federal de Psicologia. No entanto, considerando a necessidade de periodicamente se reavaliar o instrumento, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a validade convergente e concorrente do DFH-Sistema Cognitivo de Wechsler. Para validade convergente foi utilizado o teste das Matrizes Coloridas Progressivas de Raven, validado nacional e internacionalmente. Para validade concorrente, utilizou-se uma escala de desempenho escolar. Participaram 90 crianças, de 6 a 12 anos (M=8,99 e DP=1,79), 37 meninas e 53 meninos, oriundas de escolas públicas (pré-escola a 6ª série), que não realizavam atendimento psicológico e não tinham problemas de aprendizagem. Os resultados apontam a existência de correlações significativas moderadas entre o DFH, o Raven e a escala de desempenho escolar, confirmando que o DFHSistema Wechsler é válido como medida do desenvolvimento cognitivo. Sugere-se, então, que o DFH possa ser incluído em baterias de avaliação de crianças ou em triagens para futuras avaliações mais complexas.
Draw-a-Person Test (DAP) is widely used to assess cognitive development, although, the recognition of the validity of this instrument is not complete. In Brazil, the Wechsler system of evaluation of DAP has already been approved by the Federal Psychology Board. However, considering the need to periodically re-evaluate an instrument, this study attempted to test both convergent and concurrent validity of the DAP - Cognitive System according to Wechsler. Thus, Raven's Progressive Matrices, a nationally and internationally validated instrument, was used to analyze convergent validity and a school performance scale was used to analyze concurrent validity. Ninety children from 6 to 12 years old (M=8,99 and SD=1,79), 37 girls and 53 boys, from public schools (kindergarten to 6th grade), who did not engage in psychological treatment and did not have learning disabilities participated in this study. Results showed moderate positive correlations among the three instruments, confirming that DAP scored via Wechsler' system is a valid measure of cognitive development. Suggestions are made in the sense of including DAP in assessment batteries or using it as a brief assessment.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Cognição , Desenho/análise , Testes de InteligênciaRESUMO
The korean society of otolaryngology has had and experience on intraining examination since 1992. We also had the fortieth annual board examination for specialist in 1997. But we have no evidence on the validity of these tests yet. The aim of this study is to examine the validity of the intraining examinations as a tool of formative evaluation, to present a personal progress index demonstrating constructive validity, and to examine the validity of the board examination as a tool of summative evaluation. We did statistic analysis on the consecutive personal scores of 1995 and 1996 intraining examinations, and 1997 written and oral board examinations. Analysis of the averages, standard deviations, distribution curves, and Wilcoxon singed rank test on the scores of 1995 and 1996 intraining examinations demonstrated the constructive validity. Chi-square test revealed that those who had low scores in intraining examinations of two consecutive years had low scores in 1997 board examinations and personal progress index demonstrated the predictive validity. Correlation and linear regression analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between 1997 written and oral board examination. Analysis of the averages, standard deviations, distribution curves, and Spearman rank correlation coefficient revealed that 1997 written board examination had higher concurrent validity than the that of oral examination.