RESUMO
Objective To explore the assessment and intervention categorized for patients with permanent colostomy′s continue nursing problem based on the Omaha system. Methods Developing permanent colostomy′s continue nursing problem assessment form in the framework of Omaha system, using this assessment form to evaluate 46 patients′continue nursing problem and choose appropriate interventions. Results A total of 46 patients on the day of discharge had a total of 260 continue nursing problems. There were 5.7 nursing problems averagely for every patient. Incidence of more than 50%of the nursing problems had personal care, role change, mental health, sleep and rest, digestion- hydration and social; potential continue nursing problems was 90. There were 1.97 nursing problems averagely for every patient. The main potential continue nursing problems were two, respectively was colostomy complications and colostomy surrounding skin complications. Continue nursing intervention had a total of 727. There were 15.8 continue nursing interventions averagely for every patient. The most frequent interventions were for physiological and psychosocial domain. Conclusions Omaha Question Classification System can fully assess permanent colostomy′s continue nursing problem andset corresponding nursing intervention strategiesaccording to Omaha intervention system. More attention should be paid to psychosocial and health-related behavior problem. The most frequent interventions were health education, guidance, counseling and monitoring.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate and observe the influence degree of continue nursing for the self -effi-cacy and compliance of patients with coronary heart disease.Methods 90 patients with coronary heart disease were selected as the research subjects,and 90 cases were divided into control group(conventional nursing of coronary heart disease group) 45 cases and observation group(continue nursing group) 45 cases by the method of random number table.Then,the self -efficacy,treatment compliance and satisfaction degree for the nursing of the two groups before the nursing and at first,second and fourth week after the nursing were compared.Results The self -efficacy and treatment compliance of the two groups before the nursing had no significant differences (all P >0.05),while the very high rates of the observation group's self -efficacy at first,second and fourth week after the nursing were 40.00%, 57.78% and 77.78% respectively,the higher rates of treatment compliance were 64.44%,84.44% and 97.78%respectively,the total satisfaction rates for the nursing were 97.78%,100.00%,100.00% respectively,which were all higher than those of the control group(all P <0.05),the differences were significant.Conclusion The influence of continue nursing for the self -efficacy and compliance of patients with coronary heart disease are more active,and it is more definitely to the patients,so the nursing mode is more suitable to patients with coronary heart disease.
RESUMO
Objective To explore the effects of the multidisciplinary cooperative continue nursing on the quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods From December 2012 to December 2014, hospitalized COPD patients who were in the stable stage of disease and would soon be discharged and met the criteria standards were chosen. Convenient extraction of 64 patients were set as the experimental group in one ward and 50 patients as the control group in the other ward. The conventional discharge guidance was employed in the control group. While the continuation of care before discharge and 1, 3, 6 months after discharge was employed in the experimental group. The indexes such as the quality of life and 6 min walking test distance (6MWD) were observed and compared. Results The total scores and symptoms, activities, influence scores of the quality of life were 48.53±15.78, 35.38± 18.61, 57.95 ±23.69, 52.28 ±15.27 after 6 months intervention in the experimental group and 60.24 ±10.14, 52.76 ±12.36, 68.34 ±15.59, 58.55 ±11.79 in the control group, and there were significant differences (t=-5.69--2.38, P<0.05). 6MWD was (267.46 ±64.64) m after 6 months intervention in the experimental group,which was more than that before intervention (169.42±48.46) m, and there was significant difference (t=-9.71, P<0.01). 6MWD was (201.32±53.93) m after 6 months intervention in the control group, which was not significantly better than that in the experimental group (t=5.82, P<0.01). Conclusions The quality of life of patients with COPD can be significantly improved by the multidisciplinary cooperative continue nursing education after discharge.