RESUMO
Objective:To analyze evaluation outcomes and influential indexes of 116 continuing medical education (CME) programs, and to offer references for ascertaining the quality evaluation focuses of CME programs.Methods:Chi-Square test and Fisher exact test were adopted to perform univariate analysis on evaluation outcomes of 28 indexes, and logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis.Results:Logistic regression showed that the indexes influencing the evaluation outcomes of programs qualified or not included consistency of basic information [ OR=6.712, 95%CI (1.314, 34.275)], whether textbooks provided by host institutions [ OR=109.386, 95%CI (2.577, 4 642.659)], whether the number of people in the meeting room equaled with the signature list [ OR=13.296, 95%CI (2.440, 72.456)], feedback of learners examination materials [ OR=19.069, 95%CI (3.713, 97.929)], feedback of teachers evaluation materials [ OR=13.497, 95%CI (2.672, 68.181)] and whether submit learners' credits according to regulations or not [ OR=51.326, 95%CI (4.999, 526.996)]. Conclusion:The administrative departments of CME should complete program evaluation regulations, adjust and perfect evaluation indexes based on research outcomes, emphasize on influential indexes of evaluation outcomes, and give full play of the guiding role of evaluation indexes.