Eye injury after non-ocular surgery in patients underwent general anesthesia:A report of 2 cases and literature review / 吉林大学学报(医学版)

Objective:To study the pathogenesis and the risk factors of eye injury after non-ocular surgery in the patients underwent general anesthesia, and to provide the reference for its prevention, diagnosis and treatment.Methods:The clinical materials of two patients with eye injury after non-ocular surgery underwent general anesthesia were analyzed and the related literatures were reviewed.Results:A young woman patient underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy with general anesthesia while positioned Trendelenburg, the eyes were being closed naturally without protection, and corneal abrasion of both eyes occurred after operation.The lesion had completely resolved with no sequelae after treatment.An old man underwent cervical posterior laminoplasty with general anesthesia in prone position developed ischemic optic neuropathy (ION) after operation.The vision of the patients partly recovered after symptomatic treatment.Conclusion:Corneal abrasion is the most frequent ophthalmologic complication during general anesthesia, most of the patients have good prognosis.Postoperative visual loss (POVL) is the most severe ophthalmologic complication without effective treatment available, the delicate reasons and mechanisms are not totally clear, prevention outweighs treatment.

Eye injury after non-ocular surgery in patients underwent general anesthesia: A report of 2 cases and literature review / 吉林大学学报(医学版)

Objective: To study the pathogenesis and the risk factors of eye injury after non-ocular surgery in the patients underwent general anesthesia∗ and to provide the reference for its prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Methods: The clinical materials of two patients with eye injury after non-ocular surgery underwent general anesthesia were analyzed and the related literatures were reviewed. Results: A young woman patient underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy with general anesthesia while positioned Trendelenburg, the eyes were being closed naturally without protection, and corneal abrasion of both eyes occurred after operation. The lesion had completely resolved with no sequelae after treatment. An old man underwent cervical posterior laminoplasty with general anesthesia in prone position developed ischemic optic neuropathy (ION) after operation. The vision of the patients partly recovered after symptomatic treatment. Conclusion: Corneal abrasion is the most frequent ophthalmologic complication during general anesthesia, most of the patients have good prognosis. Postoperative visual loss (POVL) is the most severe ophthalmologic complication without effective treatment available, the delicate reasons and mechanisms are not totally clear, prevention outweighs treatment.

Comparison of Eye Protection Methods of Ointment Instillation under General Anesthesia

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of 3 different eye ointment instillations with eyelid taping and eyelid taping alone to prevent eye complications during surgery under general anesthesia. METHODS: A total of 296 eyes of 148 patients who underwent general anesthesia for at least 60 minutes were randomly assigned to 1 of the following 4 groups: group A, eyelid taping alone; group B, eyelid taping with solcoseryl ointment; group C, eyelid taping with carbomer ointment; group D, eyelid taping with lanolin ointment. Schirmer test, tear film break-up time (TF-BUT), conjunctival hyperemia scale (CHS), National Eye Institute corneal staining scale (NSS), and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) were prospectively evaluated before and after general anesthesia. RESULTS: TF-BUT was significantly increased in the group B compared with the preoperative value (p = 0.035). CHS was significantly decreased in all 3 ointment groups (p < 0.05) after general anesthesia and the degree was significantly higher in groups B and C (p < 0.001). No corneal abrasion developed after general anesthesia. However, corneal erosion developed in 20 eyes of previously healthy subjects; 8 eyes (12.5%) in group A, 0 eye (0%) in group B, 2 eyes (2.5%) in group C, and 10 eyes (13.9%) in group D. The occurrence rates of new lesions were significantly lower in groups B and C (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Both eyelid taping alone and eyelid taping with eye ointment are effective protection methods against corneal abrasion during operation under general anesthesia. Eye ointment instillation together with eyelid taping shows not only improvement of subjective symptoms but also improvement of objective ocular surface parameters proving to be an effective ocular protection during general anesthesia.

Comparison of Eye Protection Methods of Ointment Instillation under General Anesthesia

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of 3 different eye ointment instillations with eyelid taping and eyelid taping alone to prevent eye complications during surgery under general anesthesia. METHODS: A total of 296 eyes of 148 patients who underwent general anesthesia for at least 60 minutes were randomly assigned to 1 of the following 4 groups: group A, eyelid taping alone; group B, eyelid taping with solcoseryl ointment; group C, eyelid taping with carbomer ointment; group D, eyelid taping with lanolin ointment. Schirmer test, tear film break-up time (TF-BUT), conjunctival hyperemia scale (CHS), National Eye Institute corneal staining scale (NSS), and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) were prospectively evaluated before and after general anesthesia. RESULTS: TF-BUT was significantly increased in the group B compared with the preoperative value (p = 0.035). CHS was significantly decreased in all 3 ointment groups (p < 0.05) after general anesthesia and the degree was significantly higher in groups B and C (p < 0.001). No corneal abrasion developed after general anesthesia. However, corneal erosion developed in 20 eyes of previously healthy subjects; 8 eyes (12.5%) in group A, 0 eye (0%) in group B, 2 eyes (2.5%) in group C, and 10 eyes (13.9%) in group D. The occurrence rates of new lesions were significantly lower in groups B and C (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Both eyelid taping alone and eyelid taping with eye ointment are effective protection methods against corneal abrasion during operation under general anesthesia. Eye ointment instillation together with eyelid taping shows not only improvement of subjective symptoms but also improvement of objective ocular surface parameters proving to be an effective ocular protection during general anesthesia.

Corneal Abrasion and Visual Evoked Potentials Monitoring: Causes and Prevention.

Aims: The objective of this review is to explore the methods of eye protection from corneal abrasions during general anesthesia as they relate to procedures utilizing visual evoked potentials (VEP) monitoring. Because these protective measures may lower the accuracy of the VEP equipment, we wish to establish through existing literature current effective eye protection (with a focus on Tegaderm™) and why they could potentially interfere with VEP recording.