RESUMO
Little is known about the effects of jaguars on the population of marine turtles nesting in Tortuguero National Park, Costa Rica. This study assessed jaguar predation impact on three species of marine turtles (Chelonia mydas, Dermochelys coriáceaand Eretmochelys imbricata)that nest in Tortuguero beach. Jaguar predation data was obtained by using two methodologies, literature review (historical records prior the year 2005) and weekly surveys along the 29 km stretch of beach during the period 2005-2013. Our results indicated that jaguar predation has increased from one marine turtle in 1981 to 198 in 2013. Jaguars consumed annually an average of 120 (SD= 45) and 2 (SD= 3) green turtles and leatherbacks in Tortuguero beach, respectively. Based on our results we concluded that jaguars do not represent a threat to the population of green turtles that nest in Tortuguero beach, and it is not the main cause for population decline for leatherbacks and hawksbills. Future research should focus on continuing to monitor this predator-prey relationship as well as the factors that influence it so the proper management decisions can be taken.
Existe poco conocimiento sobre el impacto que tienen los jaguares sobre las tortugas marinas que anidan en el Parque Nacional Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Este estudio evaluó el impacto de la depredación de jaguar sobre tres especies de tortugas marinas (Chelonia mydas, Dermo-chelys coriáceay Eretmochelys imbricata)que anidan en Tortuguero. Los reportes de depredación fueron obtenidos empleando dos metodologías, revisión literaria (eventos registrados antes del 2005) y monitoreos semanales a lo largo de la playa (durante el periodo 2005-2013). La depredación del jaguar se ha incrementado de una tortuga en 1981 a 198 tortugas en 2013. Asimismo, los jaguares consumieron anualmente un promedio de 120 (SD= 45) y 2 (SD= 3) tortugas verdes y tortugas baula en Tortugue-ro, respectivamente. Nuestros resultados indican que los jaguares no representan una amenaza para la población de tortugas verdes que anida en Tortuguero, y no son la causa principal de la disminución poblacional de la tortuga baula y carey. No obstante, se recomienda continuar con el monitoreo con el fin de entender cómo esta interacción depredador-presa evolucionará en el futuro.
Assuntos
Animais , Panthera/fisiologia , Comportamento Predatório/fisiologia , Tartarugas/fisiologia , Costa Rica , Monitoramento Ambiental , Comportamento de Nidação , Densidade Demográfica , Tartarugas/classificaçãoRESUMO
Nest site selection for individual leatherback sea turtles, Dermochelys coriacea, is a matter of dispute. Some authors suggest that a female will tend to randomly scatter her nests to optimize clutch survival at a highly dynamic beach, while others suggest that some site fidelity exists. It is also possible that both strategies exist, depending on the characteristics of each nesting beach, with stable beaches leading to repeating nest site selections and unstable beaches leading to nest scattering. To determine the strategy of the Tortuguero population of D. coriacea, female site preference and repetition were determined by studying whether females repeat their nest zone choices between successive attempts and whether this leads to a correlation in hatching and emergence success of subsequent nests. Nesting data from 1997 to 2008 were used. Perpendicular to the coastline, open sand was preferred in general, regardless of initial choice. This shows a tendency to scatter nests and is consistent with the fact that all vertical zones had a high variability in hatching and emergence success. It is also consistent with nest success not being easily predictable, as shown by the lack of correlation in success of subsequent nesting attempts. Along the coastline, turtles showed a preference for the middle part of the studied section of beach, both at a population level and as a tendency to repeat their initial choice. Interestingly, this zone has the most artificial lights, which leads to slightly lower nest success (though not significantly so) and hatchling disorientation. This finding merits further study for a possibly maladaptive trait and shows the need for increased control of artificial nesting on this beach.
La selección de sitio de anidación por parte de individuos de la tortuga baula, Dermochelys coriacea, es tema de discusión. Algunos autores sugieren que una hembra dispersa sus nidos al azar para maximizar su éxito en las inestables playas que elige para anidar, mientras que otros sugieren que existe cierta fidelidad al sitio de anidación. También es posible que ambas estrategias existan, dependiendo de las características de la playa donde anidan, así playas estables llevarían a las hembras a repetir la selección de sitio mientras que las playas inestables las llevarían a dispersar sus nidos. Para determinar la estrategia que usan las hembras de D. coriacea de Tortuguero, se estudió la preferencia de sitio de las hembras así como su repetición en este sitio, desde 1997 hasta 2008. Para la selección de sitio vertical (perpendicular a la costa), las hembras en general prefirieron anidar en arena abierta, independientemente de su escogencia inicial. Esto muestra una tendencia a dispersar los nidos y es consistente con la alta variación en los éxitos de eclosión en todas las zonas, así como la falta de relación entre los éxitos de eclosión de nidos subsecuentes, lo cual muestra que el éxito de los nidos no es predecible. Para la selección horizontal (a lo largo de la costa) se prefirió la parte media de la sección estudiada de la playa, tanto a nivel poblacional como individual (repetición de selección de sitio). Interesantemente, esta zona tiene la mayor cantidad de luces artificiales lo cual lleva a éxitos de eclosión ligeramente más bajos (aunque no significativamente) y a la desorientación de neonatos. Este resultado amerita estudios futuros para determinar si se trata de una tendencia maladaptativa en la población y muestra la importancia de controlar la cantidad de luz artificial en esta playa como medida de conservación.
Assuntos
Tartarugas/embriologia , Ovos/análise , Implantação do Embrião , Costa RicaRESUMO
Leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) nest on dynamic, erosion-prone beaches. Erosive processes and resulting nest loss have long been presumed to be a hindrance to clutch survival. In order to better understand how leatherbacks cope with unstable nesting beaches, I investigated the role of beach erosion in leatherback nest site selection at Playa Gandoca, Costa Rica. I also examined the potential effect of nest relocation, a conservation strategy in place at Playa Gandoca to prevent nest loss to erosion, on the temperature of incubating clutches. I monitored changes in beach structure as a result of erosion at natural nest sites during the time the nest was laid, as well as in subsequent weeks. To investigate slope as a cue for nest site selection, I measured the slope of the beach where turtles ascended from the sea to nest, as well as the slopes at other random locations on the beach for comparison. I examined temperature differences between natural and relocated nest sites with thermocouples placed in the sand at depths typical of leatherback nests. Nests were distributed non-randomly in a clumped distribution along the length of the beach and laid at locations that were not undergoing erosion. The slope at nest sites was significantly different than at randomly chosen locations on the beach. The sand temperature at nest depths was significantly warmer at natural nest sites than at locations of relocated nests. The findings of this study suggest leatherbacks actively select nest sites that are not undergoing erosive processes, with slope potentially being used as a cue for site selection. The relocation of nests appears to be inadvertently cooling the nest environment. Due to the fact that leatherback clutches undergo temperaturedependent sex determination, the relocation of nests may be producing an unnatural male biasing of hatchlings. The results of this study suggest that the necessity of relocation practices, largely in place to protect nests from erosion, should be reevaluated to ensure the proper conservation of this critically endangered species. Rev. Biol. Trop. 58 (4): 1237-1246. Epub 2010 December 01.
Assuntos
Animais , Feminino , Masculino , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Comportamento de Nidação/fisiologia , Tartarugas/fisiologia , Costa Rica , Desastres , Espécies em Perigo de Extinção , Razão de MasculinidadeRESUMO
Impact of artificial light on nesting in the leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea (Testudines: Dermochelyidae) at Cipara beach, Venezuela. The number of Leatherback turtle nests and their spatial distribution was compared between years with and without artificial light, and between dark and lighted beach segments, in Cipara Beach, Paria Peninsula, Venezuela. Residents were interviewed to identify their perceptions about the impact of artificial light on sea turtles. Mean volume of sand per meter of beach was larger at La Peña, Cipara and La Remate and smaller at Varadero (p<0.001), increasing from April to June and later decreasing until August (p<0.05). Mean percentage of gravel was higher at Varadero and La Peña, and lower at La Remate and Cipara. Most interviewed people said that artificial light does not affect sea turtles. Between 2000 and 2005, 1 217 leatherback landings and 1 056 nests were observed. Successful nests increased with the years (p=0.035) as well as total nest number (p=0.015). From 2000 through 2003 there were 743 landings, 661 nests and 374 clutches. During the two years with electric light (2004-2005), there were 474 landings, 395 nests and 232 clutches. Proportion of landings with nest building decreased significantly during the years with electric light (p= 0.005), but nesting success did not vary (p= 0.402). No significant difference was found between landings per beach meter in dark and lighted sectors (p=0.244), between nests built (p=0.379) and in the rate of successful nesting (p=0.516). Dark and lighted sectors did not differ in the proportion of landings with nest building (p=0.067) and success rate (p=0.833). Rev. Biol. Trop. 57 (3): 515-528. Epub 2009 September 30.
En Playa Cipara, Península de Paria, Venezuela, se evaluó el impacto de la luz artificial sobre la anidación de la tortuga cardón. Se estimó el número de anidaciones y su distribución espacial a lo largo de la playa entre los años sin y con iluminación artificial y entre segmentos de playa iluminada y oscura. Se hicieron entrevistas a los residentes para conocer su percepción sobre el impacto de la luz artificial hacia las tortugas marinas. Entre el 2000 y 2005 se registraron 1 217 salidas de tortuga cardón; con 1 056 nidos. El número de nidos con huevos dependió significativamente del año (p=0.035) al igual que el número de nidos totales (p=0.015). En los años previos a la electricidad (2000-2003) se observaron 743 salidas, de las cuales 661 con nido y 374 nidadas confirmadas. En los dos años (2004-2005) con iluminación artificial, se contaron 474 salidas con 395 nidos y 232 nidadas. La proporción de salidas con construcción de nido disminuyó significativamente (p=0.005) en los años con luz eléctrica, pero no varió el éxito de desove (p=0.402). No se encontró diferencia significativa entre el número de salidas por metro de playa en los sectores oscuros y los iluminados (p=0.244), ni entre el número de nidos construidos (p=0.379), ni entre las anidaciones con desove (p=0.516). Tampoco en la proporción de las salidas totales que constituyeron anidaciones (p=0.067) entre los sectores iluminados y oscuros, ni en la proporción de nidos exitosos (p=0.833). El volumen medio de arena por metro de playa fue mayor en La Peña, Cipara y La Remate y menor en Varadero (p<0.001), aumentando de abril a junio y posteriormente disminuyó un poco hasta agosto (p<0.05). El porcentaje medio de gravas fue mayor en Varadero y La Peña y menor en La Remate y Cipara. La mayoría de los entrevistados consideraron que la luz artificial no afecta a las tortugas marinas.