Fatores associados à difícil canulação biliar em um centro de treinamento para intervenção endoscópica do trato biliar / Factors associated with difficult biliary cannulation in a training center for endoscopic intervention of the biliary tract

ABSTRACT Background This paper aims to determine factors associated with difficult biliary cannulation (DBC) that are identifiable before procedures. Methods This is a nested case-control study within a historical cohort in adult patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) from 2015-2019 in the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Colombia. This study assessed the associations among variables that could be identified before or at the beginning of procedures and the probability of DBC. These associations were evaluated through a bivariate and multivariate analysis. The study used criteria for DBC defined by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Results A total of 498 ERCP performed in 376 patients were analyzed. Of all procedures, 144 (29%) fulfilled criteria for DBC. The multivariate analysis showed an association between DBC and the acute care hospital setting (OR:2.92; CI95% 1.70-5.01; P<0.001), redundant papilla (OR:7.26; CI95% 3.38-15.61; P<0.001), or peridiverticular papilla (OR:2.45; CI95% 1.38-4.36; P=0.002). No association was found between DBC and endoscopist's experience, bilirubin levels, or dilation of the biliary tract. Conclusion The DBC is a frequent event. Alterations in the papilla and ERCP performed in the acute care hospital setting are the principal factors associated with DBC. This information might be useful to predict DBC and establish healthcare and administrative strategies to reduce its implications.

RESUMO Contexto Este artigo tem como objetivo determinar fatores associados à dificuldade de canulação biliar que sejam identificáveis antes dos procedimentos. Métodos Trata-se de um estudo de caso-controle dentro de uma coorte histórica em pacientes adultos submetidos a colangiopancreatografia retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) de 2015 a 2019 no Hospital Universitário San Ignacio, em Bogotá, Colômbia. Avaliou-se as associações entre variáveis que poderiam ser identificadas antes ou no início dos procedimentos e a probabilidade de difícil canulação biliar (DCB). Essas associações foram avaliadas por meio de análise bivariada e multivariada. O estudo utilizou critérios para DCB definidos pela Sociedade Europeia de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal. Resultados Foram analisados 498 CPRE em 376 pacientes. De todos os procedimentos, 144 (29%) preencheram critérios para DCB. A análise multivariada mostrou associação entre a DCB e o ambiente hospitalar de atenção aguda (OR:2,92; CI 95% 1,70-5,01; P<0,001), papila redundante (OR:7,26; CI95% 3,38-15,61; P<0,001), ou papila peridiverticular (OR:2,45; CI95% 1,38-4,36; P=0,002). Não foi encontrada associação entre a DCB e a experiência do endoscopista, dos níveis de bilirrubina ou da dilatação do trato biliar. Conclusão A DCB é um evento frequente. Alterações na papila e CPRE realizadas no ambiente hospitalar de cuidados agudos são os principais fatores associados a DCB. Essas informações podem ser úteis para prever a DCB e estabelecer estratégias de saúde e administrativas para reduzir suas implicações.

Comparison between double guidewire technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy technique for difficult biliary cannulation / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of double guidewire technique ( DGT ) with transpancreatic sphincterotomy ( TPS) in cannulation of difficult biliary. Methods The data of patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography from January 2014 to January 2016 in our hospital were retrospectively studied. DGT or TPS was performed on patients with difficult biliary cannulation and frequent unintended pancreatic cannulation. The cannulation success rate, cannulation time and complications of DGT and TPS were compared. Results Data of 237 patients with difficult biliary cannulation were collected, including 135 using DGT and 102 using TPS. The cannulation success rate was 79. 3％ (107/135) in DGT and 90. 2％ (92/102) in TPS (P=0. 023). The cannulation time was 8. 8±2. 7 min in DGT and 4. 7±1. 3 min in TPS (P=0. 017). The overall incidence of complications was 8. 9％(12/135) in DGT and 8. 8％ (9/102) in TPS (P=0. 986). Conclusion For patients with difficult biliary cannulation, TPS has higher success rate, shorter cannulation time, and similar complication rate compared with DGT. Endoscopists with skilled TPS procedure could select TPS as a preferred method in difficult biliary cannulation.

The rendezvous technique involving insertion of a guidewire in a percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage tube for biliary access in a case of difficult biliary cannulation / Journal of Rural Medicine

<p>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a diagnostic method and treatment approach for biliary diseases. However, biliary cannulation can be difficult in some cases. We performed ERCP in a 97-year-old woman with abdominal pain resulting from acute cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasis and observed difficult biliary cannulation. Eventually, the patient was successfully treated with the rendezvous technique. We could not cannulate the biliary duct during ERCP twice. Therefore, we placed a percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) tube without intrahepatic dilation. The rendezvous technique was performed using the PTGBD tube. The patient did not experience pancreatitis or perforation.</p>

Different Strategies for Transpancreatic Septotomy and Needle Knife Infundibulotomy Due to the Presence of Unintended Pancreatic Cannulation in Difficult Biliary Cannulation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Several precut techniques have been used to gain biliary access for difficult cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success and complication rates of two precut techniques, transpancreatic septotomy (TPS) and needle knife infundibulotomy (NKI), in difficult biliary cannulation due to the presence of unintended pancreatic cannulation. METHODS: Eighty-six patients who failed standard biliary cannulation were included. TPS was performed when we failed to achieve biliary access despite 5 minutes of attempted cannulation or when more than three attempted unintended pancreatic cannulations occurred. If deep cannulation was not achieved within 5 minutes for any duct, NKI was performed. If this failed, we crossed over to the other technique in the second attempt. RESULTS: The initial total success rate of biliary cannulation was 88.4% (86.6% for the TPS group and 94.7% for the NKI group, p=0.447). After crossover of the techniques, the final success rate was 95.3%. The complication rate was 20.9% in patients with TPS and 15.8% in patients with NKI (p=0.753). CONCLUSIONS: The use of different strategies based on the presence of unintended pancreatic cannulation may help increase the success rate for difficult biliary cannulation without increasing complication rates.