Comparison of gait and hip ambulation ability after total hip arthroplasty through different approaches / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND:In the selection of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty approaches,there is considerable debate about whether direct anterior and posterior approaches differ in postoperative gait,limb balance,and hip motor capacity,and therefore further investigation is warranted. OBJECTIVE:To assess the gait and hip ambulation ability of direct anterior and posterior approaches for primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty with a prospective randomized controlled study. METHODS:A total of 61 patients with unilateral avascular necrosis of the femoral head in Qingdao Municipal Hospital from January 2019 to June 2020 were included in the study.There were 40 males and 21 females,at a mean age of(64.83±5.52)years.All the patients were randomly divided into a direct anterior approach group(n=28)and a posterior approach group(n=33),and received initial total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach and posterior approach,respectively.Gait analysis(gait time-space parameters such as stride length,stride frequency,single-leg support time,and plantar pressure difference)and hip ambulation ability(standing-walking timing test and 2-minute walking test)were performed before and 1,3 and 6 months after operation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)With the extension of postoperative time,gait time-space parameters in both groups were gradually improved.The stride length,stride frequency,single-leg support time,and plantar pressure difference in the direct anterior approach group were significantly better than those in the posterior approach group 1 month after surgery(P<0.01).The stride frequency,single-leg support time,and plantar pressure difference in the direct anterior approach group were significantly better than those in the posterior approach group 3 months after surgery(P<0.05).The plantar pressure difference in the direct anterior approach group was significantly better than that in the posterior approach group 6 months after surgery(P<0.01).(2)With the extension of postoperative time,the results of the standing-walking timing test and 2-minute walking test were gradually improved in both groups.The results of the standing-walking timing test and 2-minute walking test 1 and 3 months after operation in the direct anterior approach group were better than those in the posterior approach group(P<0.05).(3)The results have indicated that the recovery of postoperative gait and hip ambulation ability of the two groups is inconsistent.The direct anterior approach group has some advantages in the improvement of postoperative gait and hip ambulation ability compared with the posterior approach group in the early postoperative period.

Mid-and long-term state after total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly:evaluation using propensity score matching method / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND:Arthroplasty is the primary treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly,and the choice of total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty is currently the subject of considerable debate. OBJECTIVE:To compare the mid-and long-term survival status of total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty under a direct anterior approach for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly based on the propensity score matching method. METHODS:One hundred and forty-seven elderly patients(≥65 years of age)with displaced femoral neck fractures were admitted from January 2016 to January 2021,of whom 88 had total hip arthroplasty(total hip arthroplasty group)and 59 had artificial femoral head replacement(hemiarthroplasty group).For the patients'preoperative comorbidities,the age-corrected Charlson Comorbidity Scale was used to quantify the scores and calculate patient frailty.The propensity score matching method was used to match the two groups 1:1 and to compare the operation time,bleeding,postoperative hospitalization time,hospitalization cost,nutritional index,postoperative complications,and mortality between the two groups after matching.Postoperative survival time was determined by Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)After propensity score matching,a total of 42 matched pairs were successful in both groups,and the preoperative data of patients in both groups were balanced and comparable after matching(P>0.05).(2)Compared with the hemiarthroplasty group,operation time(79.71 minutes vs.59.07 minutes,P<0.001),bleeding volume(839.64 mL vs.597.83 mL,P=0.001),and hospitalization cost(56 508.15 yuan vs.41 702.85 yuan,P<0.001)were significantly higher in the total hip arthroplasty group.However,the mortality rate was lower in the total hip arthroplasty group than in the hemiarthroplasty group(36%vs.57%,HR=0.44,95%CI:0.23-0.87,P=0.018),and the mean survival time was longer in the total hip arthroplasty group than in the hemiarthroplasty group(59.4 months vs.43.7 months,P=0.024).(3)There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospitalization time,preoperative and postoperative nutritional indicators,and overall postoperative complication rate between the two groups(P>0.05).However,in terms of postoperative pain,the incidence of pain was significantly higher in the hemiarthroplasty group than that in the total hip arthroplasty group(24%vs.7%,P=0.035).(4)Overall,total hip arthroplasty has a better prognosis for survival,while hemiarthroplasty is more appropriate for patients with poor physical fitness.At the same time,postoperative pain may largely affect the quality and survival time of patients after hip arthroplasty.

Artroplastia total de cadera por abordaje anterior directo (Hueter)

Introducción: La artroplastia de cadera se considera un tratamiento exitoso en ortopedia. El abordaje anterior directo, a través del intervalo de Hueter, evita la disección de inserciones musculares del hueso y disminuye la alteración de los tejidos blandos alrededor de la cadera. Objetivos: Presentar los resultados de artroplastias totales de cadera primarias, realizadas por abordaje anterior directo. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo-prospectivo, tipo serie de casos, con pacientes intervenidos por artroplastia total de cadera primaria no cementada a través de abordaje anterior directo. Resultados: Predominaron el sexo femenino y los grupos etarios de 45 y 60 años. El índice de masa corporal resultó bajo y hubo escaso riesgo anestésico. El tiempo quirúrgico superó las dos horas, con escaso sangrado operatorio. La correcta colocación del componente acetabular y el femoral permitió que la deambulación iniciara en menos de tres días. Las complicaciones fueron escasas y se resolvieron con el tratamiento adecuado. Conclusiones: El empleo de abordaje anterior directo para artroplastias totales de cadera primarias ofrece resultados muy satisfactorios.

Introduction: Hip arthroplasty is considered a successful treatment in Orthopedics. The direct anterior approach, through Hueter interval, avoids the dissection of muscular attachments to the bone and decreases the alteration of the soft tissues around the hip. Objectives: To report the results of primary total hip arthroplasties, performed by direct anterior approach. Methods: A descriptive-prospective case series study was carried out with patients who underwent primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach. Results: The female sex and the age groups of 45 and 60 years predominated. The body mass index was low and there was little anesthetic risk. Surgical time exceeded two hours, with little operative bleeding. The correct placement of the acetabular and femoral components allowed ambulation to begin in less than three days. Complications were rare and resolved with appropriate treatment. Conclusions: The use of the direct anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasties offers very satisfactory results.

Effect of posture on total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the effect of different postures on direct anterior approach(DAA) total hip arthroplasty.@*METHODS@#Total of 94 patients who underwent DAA total hip arthroplasty from July 2016 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups according to different positions during the operation, including 45 cases in lateral position and 49 cases in supine position (with the aid of stent). The general data such as gender, affected limb, body mass index(BMI), incision length, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, drainage volume 24 hours after operation, hemoglobin difference before and after operation, first landing time after operation, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative complications, visual analogue scale(VAS) at 1 day, 1, 2 weeks, 1, 3 and 6 months after operation, Harris score at 1, 2 weeks, 1, 3 and 6 months after operation were observed and compared between the two groups.@*RESULTS@#Patients in both groups were followed up for 6 to 12 months with an average of (8.31±2.22) months. There was no significant difference between two groups in gender, affected limb, age, height, weight, body mass index(BMI), preoperative VAS score and preoperative Harris score(P>0.05). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, 24-hour drainage volume, hemoglobin difference before and after operation, first time to the ground and postoperative hospitalization time of patients in supine position (assisted by stent) group were all better than those in lateral position group(P<0.05);There was no significant difference in the number of blood transfusions during and after operation(P=0.550). There was no significant difference in anteversion angle and abduction angle in the supine position(with the aid of stent) group during and after operation (P=0.825, P=0.066);There was significant difference in anteversion angle and abduction angle in the lateral position group during and after operation(P<0.05). VAS of patients in supine position (assisted by stent) group were lower than those in lateral position group at 1 day, 1, 2 weeks and 1 month after operation(P<0.05), and there was no statistical difference between two groups at 3 and 6 months after operation(P>0.05). Harris scores of patients in supine position(assisted by stent) group were higher than those in lateral position group at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after operation(P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between two groups at 6 months after operation(P>0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#Compared with the lateral position, the supine position DAA total hip arthroplasty has the advantages of small incision, short operation time, less bleeding, early landing time, short hospitalization time, and small intraoperative acetabular cup position judgment error. It has the advantage of fast postoperative recovery, but the recovery of hip joint function is the same after 6 months.

Comparison of early clinical outcomes between SuperCap and direct anterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To compare the short-term clinical efficacy of SuperCap approach and direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty.@*METHODS@#Clinical data of 70 patients who underwent minimally invasive SuperCap approach and DAA THA in January 2016 to June 2017 were retrospective analyzed. These patients were divided into two groups:SuperCap approach group(SuperCap group) and direct anterior approach group(DAA group). There were 15 males and 15 females in SuperCap group, aged from 45 to 71 years old, and the follow-up time ranged from 24 to 30 months. There were 24 males and 16 females in Group B, aged from 51 to 76 years and the follow-up time ranged from 24 to 36 months. Hemoglobin level of the 3rd day after operation, transfusion rate, acetabular abduction angle, anteversion angle and creatine kinase level of the 3rd day after operation, Harris score of 3 months and the last time, VAS score of 1 week and the last time were recorded and compared. Complications were recorded at the final follow-up.@*RESULTS@#All patients were followed up, the follow-up time of SuperCap group ranged from 24 to 30 months, that of DAA group ranged from 24 to 36 months. No significant differences were found in hemoglobin level on the 3rd day after operation, transfusion rate, Harris score or VAS score between two group (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in Harris score between 3 months after operation and the final follow-up in both groups (P>0.05). There were no significant difference in VAS scores of 6 weeks after operation and on the final follow-up neither(P>0.05). The level of creatine kinase in SuperCap group was significant lower than that in DAA group(P<0.05). Until the final follow-up, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#The clinical effect of minimally invasive SuperCap approach after total hip arthroplasty is comparable to that of DAA approach with less soft tissue injury. Patients can recover rapidly after operation and it is a safe and effective surgical approach for surgeons with short learning curve.

Efficacy and safety offemoral head replacement through the direct anterior approach assisting by the traction tablefor femoral neck fracture in the elderly / 实用医学杂志

Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety off emoral head replacement(FHR)assisting by the traction table in direct anterior approach(DAA)for the treatment of femur neck fractures in gerontal patients.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 79 elderly patients who under went FHR for femoral neck fractures from March 2019 to July 2020.A total of 42 patients underwent FHR through DAA by using traction table were assigned to the observation group and 37 patients receiving FHR through the PLA to the control group.The perioperative data,follow-up results and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The observation group was significantly superior to the control group in intraoperative blood loss(P<0.05),where as the former was inferior to the latter in preoperative preparation time(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in anesthesia time and operation time between the two groups(P>0.05).The observation group resumed first postoperative standing time,partial-weight bearing walking time and full-weight bearing walk-ing time significantly earlier than control group(P<0.05).Harris score at 1 month after the operation in the observation group were significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05),whereas which became not statistical significant between the two groups in 6 months and 1 year(P>0.05).No significant difference was found between the two groups for the incidence of complications(P>0.05).Conclusion DAA-FHR assisting by the traction table for the treatment of femur neck fractures in the elderly was effective and safe,but the preoperative preparation time was longer.

Chinese expert consensus on the technical standard of direct anterior hip arthroplasty for elderly femoral neck fracture (version 2023) / 中华创伤杂志

Femoral neck fracture (FNF) in the elderly patients is currently a major health challenge worldwide, with excessive consumption of medical resources, high incidence of complications as well as suboptimal outcome and prognosis. Hip joint arthroplasty (HJA) has been the mainstream treatment for FNF in the elderly, but the conventional surgical approaches and techniques are still confronted with a series of bottlenecks such as dislocation, limp and limb length discrepancy. In recent years, direct anterior approach (DAA) for HJA (DAA-HJA) has been a major new choice in the field of joint replacement, which achieves improved clinical effectiveness of HJA in the treatment of elderly FNF, due to the fact that DAA approach involves the neuromuscular interface and accords with the idea of soft tissue retention and enhanced recovery after surgery. However, there is still a lack of unified understanding of standard technique and procedure of DAA-HJA in the treatment of elderly FNF. Therefore, relevant experts from the Hip Joint Group of Chinese Orthopedics Association of Chinese Medical Association, Youth Arthrology Group of Orthopedic Committee of PLA, Orthopedic Committee of Chongqing Medical Association, Branch of Orthopedic Surgeons of Chongqing Medical Doctor Association and Sport Medicine Committee of Chongqing Medical Association were organized to formulate the " Chinese expert consensus on the technical standard of direct anterior hip arthroplasty for elderly femoral neck fracture ( version 2023)" based on evidence-based medicine. This consensus mainly proposed 13 recommendations covering indications, surgical plans, prosthesis selections, surgical techniques and processes, and postoperative management of DAA-HJA in elderly patients with FNF, aiming to promote standardized, systematic and patient-specific diagnosis and treatment to improve the functional prognosis of the patients.

A comparative study on the clinical effects of hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach in lateral decubitus in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis caused by Kaschin-Beck disease and congenital acetabular dysplasia / 中华地方病学杂志

Objective:To compare the clinical effects of hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach (DAA) in lateral decubitus in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis caused by Kaschin-Beck disease and congenital acetabular dysplasia.Methods:The prospective study method was used to select the patients who needed hip arthroplasty in the Fourth Department of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from January 2015 to December 2019. All of them were operated with lateral decubitus DAA. According to the inclusion criteria, they were divided into Kacshin-Beck disease hip osteoarthritis group (group A) and congenital acetabular dysplasia hip osteoarthritis group (group B). Hip Harris score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score were conducted, and hip abduction angle and flexion angle were measured before surgery, 3, 14 days and 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery.Results:Nineteen and twenty-two patients were included in group A and group B, respectively. All patients successfully completed the surgery. There was no significant difference in Harris score between the two groups before surgery, 3, 14 days, and 1, 12 months after surgery ( P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in WOMAC score, VAS score, hip abduction angle and hip flexion angle between the two groups before surgery and each time point after surgery ( P > 0.05). In the same group, there were significant differences in Harris score, WOMAC score, VAS score, hip abduction angle and hip flexion angle at different time points ( P < 0.001). All postoperative indicators were significantly improved compared with those before surgery. Conclusions:There is no significant difference in the clinical effects of hip arthroplasty through lateral decubitus DAA in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis caused by Kaschin-Beck disease and congenital acetabular dysplasia. This surgical method has good therapeutic effect on both types of hip osteoarthritis.

Comparison of Anterior and Lateral Approach in Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Femur Neck Fractures in the Elderly: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

@#Introduction: Many surgical approaches have been described for hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) treating femur neck fractures (FNFs). Direct lateral approach (DLA) is one of the most used. Today, the direct anterior approach (DAA) has become very attractive, but it seems to involve more intra-operative fractures. Our main endpoint was to demonstrate that the DAA may be a valid alternative comparing to the DLA. Materials and methods: Patients affected by FNFs and treated with HHA between the years 2016 and 2020 were studied. We divided the treatment of the fractures according to the surgical approach. The analysis was focused on perioperative complications and radiological outcomes. Results: There were a total of 166 patients. The DLA group included patients with an average age of 83.5 years and the DAA group of 83 years. We found similar surgical times (DLA 67 min vs DAA 61 min; p = 0,55), number of transfusions (DLA 3/person vs DAA 4/person; p = 0,91), perioperative complications (fractures: DLA 0 vs DAA 0 – dislocations: DLA 2,50% vs DAA 0) and functional outcomes (HHS: DLA 83 points vs DAA 87 points; p = 0,71). There were no statistical differences comparing diaphyseal filling (Canal Fill Index at the proximal third: DLA 0,79 vs DAA 0,78; p= 0,24), bone loss (Paprosky I: DLA 96,25% vs DAA 91,86%; p = 0,47) and prevalence of heterotopic ossification (Broker low degree: DLA 93,75% vs 95, 34%; p = 0,87). Conclusion: Analysing perioperative complications and studying post-operative radiographic evolution, our results suggest that the DAA is a valid alternative to the DLA in HHA treating FNFs.

Application value of liquid crystal digital display goniometer in total hip arthroplasty / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the application value of liquid crystal digital display goniometer in total hip arthroplasty.@*METHODS@#From January 2018 to December 2019, 83 patients underwent primary total hip arthroplasty, including 28 males and 55 females, aged 42 to 81 (70.4±7.9) years. There were 63 cases of femoral neck fracture and 20 cases of avascular necrosis of femoral head. All patients used liquid crystal digital goniometer to control the anteversion of acetabular cup prosthesis during operation, and CT scanning was used to measure the anteversion of acetabular cup after operation. The two methods were compared to understand the accuracy of using liquid crystal digital goniometer.@*RESULTS@#Postoperative CT measurement showed that the acetabular anteversion of all patients was in the safe area advocated by Lewinnek. The anteversion angle of acetabular cup measured by liquid crystal digital goniometer was 14.20(12.80 to 15.40)°, and the anteversion angle of acetabular cup measured by postoperative CT scan was 14.20 (13.40 to 15.50)°. There was no significant difference between the two (@*CONCLUSION@#It is an accurate and reliable method to control the anteversion of acetabular cup with liquid crystal digital display angle instrument, which has a good auxiliary reference value.

Meta-analysis of direct anterior approach and other approaches for hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of high-quality direct anterior approach (DAA) and other approaches for the treatment of elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.@*METHODS@#Literatures published in English or Chinese about the direct anterior approach and other approaches for hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fracture were searched on Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Wanfang, CNKI databases from their establishment to May 2019. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers independently screened the literatures, and extracted the data. The quality of RCT were evaluated by Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, and non-RCT were evaluated by the NOS scale. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software.@*RESULTS@#A total of 9 articles were included with 901 cases, in which 429 cases used DAA, and 472 used other approaches. DAA had a significantly lower dislocation rate compared to subgroup of posterior and posterolateral approach [=0.19, 95%CI (0.06, 0.61), =0.005]. No significant differences were found between DAA group and subgroup of direct lateral and anterolateral approach[=1.08, 95%CI(0.20, 5.76), =0.93]. Also there were no relevant differences between the DAA group and control in infection rate[=1.07, 95%CI(0.47, 2.43), =0.88], perioperative fracture rate[=0.95, 95%CI(0.36, 2.50), =0.92], re operation rate[=0.76, 95%CI(0.30, 1.89), =0.55], overall complication rate [=0.88, 95%CI (0.63, 1.22), =0.44], mortality [=1.33, 95%CI (0.84, 2.11), =0.23], operative time[MD=1.43, 95%CI(-5.85, 8.71), =0.70].@*CONCLUSION@#The current evidenceindicates that the DAA was associated with a significantly lower dislocation rate compared to posterior capsular approaches for hemiarthroplasty. There was no significant difference in dislocation rate with the lateral and anterolateral approach.

Evaluation of short-term clinical effect of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach in lateral position / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the short-term clinical effect of direct anterior approach (DAA) in total hip arthroplasty(THA).@*METHODS@#From January 2018 to September 2018, the data of 30 patients(33 hips) who underwent the first THA using the side lying DAA completed by the same operation team were followed up and evaluated. There were 19 males and 11 females;the age was 58 to 80 (69.0±5.4) years old;the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain was used, Harris scoring system, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, related complications and hip radiographs were evaluated in clinical and imaging aspects.@*RESULTS@#Thirty patients (33 hips) were followed up for 12 to 20(14.3±3.7) months, operation time (66.0±7.2) min and intraoperativehemorrhage (156±32) ml. The position of acetabulum prosthesis was examined by imaging:anteversion angle (18.6±3.6)° and abduction angle (41.2±4.8)° respectively. The VAS score was improved from 7 to 9(8.1±1.4) before operation to 1 to 3(1.9±0.7) at 1 month after operation. Harris score of hip joint improved significantly, from 28 to 46(35.4±5.2) before operation to 76 to 92 (88.6±4.5) at 1 month after operation, 74 to 93 (85.6±6.9) at 6 months after operation, and 79 to 95 (90.7±8.1) at 12 months after operation, the difference was statistically significant(<0.05). Complications occurred in 3 cases of fracture of the proximal femur, including 1 case of hip sprain fracture due to careless walking one month after operation. Considering that incomplete fracture may have occurred during the operation, 1 case of avulsion fracture of anterior inferior iliac spine, no deep infection, no dislocation. There were 1 case of injury of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and 2 cases of injury of tensor fascia lata, among which 1 case was complete incision of the edge of the hook.@*CONCLUSION@#The primary THA with DAA in lateral position has a good short;term clinical effect, can meet the needs of patients' rapid recovery, and is a safe and effective surgical approach.

Advantages and learning curve of direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: With the trend of minimally invasive and “rapid rehabilitation” in modern surgery, direct anterior approach is preferred by orthopedic surgeon in recent years. OBJECTIVE: To review the direct anterior approach’s history, surgical indications, patients’ selection, surgical methods, common complications, surgery advantages and learning curves, to provide ideas for the rapid rehabilitation of hip arthroplasty. METHODS: PubMed, Wanfang database, and CNKI were retrieved for articles addressing total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach published from 1956 to 2020. Key words were minimally invasive, direct anterior approach, total hip arthroplasty, enhanced recovery after surgery, complication, learning curve” in Chinese and English. Finally, 67 articles met the criteria for review. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The direct anterior approach is an ideal minimally invasive surgical path because of it walks in the fascia gap and it is a truly neuromuscular interface with no damage to important muscles and nerve blood vessels. (2) Direct anterior approach has advantages of quicker recovery, less postoperative pain, short hospital stay and high patient satisfaction. However, because most doctors in our country have changed their surgical approach to direct anterior approach, direct anterior approach still has shortages, such as long learning curve and high rate of early complications.

Comparison of direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in supine position for total hip arthroplasty / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: The posterolateral approach is the most commonly used surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty. In recent years, total hip replacement by direct anterior approach has been applied in clinic gradually, and has achieved good treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of the direct anterior approach in supine position and the posterolateral approach in supine position for total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty at Baoding Municipal First Center Hospital from April 2015 to April 2019 were included, including 35 males and 55 females, aged 35-70 years. The patients were divided into direct anterior approach group (n=45) and posterolateral approach group (n=45) by the random number table method. Postoperative follow-up was used to evaluate the Harris hip scores, Visual Analogue Scale scores, initial fixation mass of prosthesis and safe range of the cup. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Baoding Municipal First Center Hospital. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Ninety patients were followed up for 3-51 months, with an average 14 months. There were 2 cases of intraoperative great trochanteric fracture, 1 case of femoral lateral cutaneous nerve injury, 4 cases of femoral nerve injury, and 20 cases of tensor fascia lata injury. No such complications occurred in the posterolateral approach group. (2) The direct anterior approach group showed significant superior outcomes compared with the posterolateral approach group in the Harris hip scores and Visual Analogue Scale scores at 1 month after surgery (P 0.05). (3) In the direct anterior approach group, the femoral prosthesis of 44 hips was in neutral position, and 1 hip was in varus position. The initial fixation quality of all prosthesis was excellent. In the posterolateral approach group, the femoral prosthesis of 43 hips was in neutral position, 2 hips were in varus position and all prosthesis initial fixation quality was excellent. No significant difference was found between two groups (P > 0.05). (4) The ratio of acetabular cups in the safety range of Lewinnek in the direct anterior approach group was higher than that in the posterolateral approach group (100%, 82%, P < 0.05). (5) These results imply that compared with the posterolateral approach, direct anterior approach in supine position for total hip arthroplasty can significantly reduce postoperative pain, promote postoperative early rapid recovery, obtain more accurate angle of the acetabular prosthesis, and be more conducive to the equalization of both lower limbs. It is a safe and reliable approach. However, direct anterior approach has certain technical difficulty and needs a learning curve. And there are some complications different from other approaches.

Direct anterior approach versus anterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: Comparison of early postoperative patient’s perception / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty can significantly alleviate pain in patients with end-stage hip disease and improve the joint function. Different surgical approaches have their own advantages and disadvantages. As a popular approach, direct anterior approach is to expose the hip joint through the fascia lata muscle and the sartorius muscle gap, which is in line with the concept of minimally invasive surgery, and has the advantages of small damage to soft tissue and quick recovery after arthroplasty. However, it has a certain learning curve, which requires the surgeons to have certain experience. OBJECTIVE: To compare the perception of the elderly with unilateral femoral head fracture undergoing total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach and anterolateral approach. METHODS: Forty-two patients (42 hips) with unilateral femoral head fracture in Orthopedic Center, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People’s Hospital from January 2017 to June 2018 were enrolled, and all patients underwent total hip arthroplasty. The patients were randomized into two groups, including 21 patients (21 hips) in anterolateral approach group and 21 patients (21 hips) in direct anterior approach group. The patients signed the informed consents and the study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee. The incision length, operation time and blood loss were recorded. The Harris hip joint score, and Oxford Hip scores at 1 week, 1 and 3 months postoperatively were compared. The prosthesis location and complications were observed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The hospitalization time in the direct anterior approach group was significantly shorter than that in the anterolateral approach group (P 0.05). (4) The Harris hip and Oxford Hip scores at 1 week after surgery in the direct anterior approach group were significantly higher than those in anterolateral approach group (P 0.05). (5) One case in the direct anterior approach group and two cases in the anterolateral approach group appeared with bursitis surrounding with the incision and pain, which disappeared after local sealing. One patient in the direct anterior approach group developed subcutaneous hematoma, and healed at postoperative 3 weeks. One case in the direct anterior approach suffered from inner thigh skin numbness. (6) These results indicate that at early postoperative period, patients in anterolateral approach group are feeling better than those in direct anterior approach group. Although direct anterior approach has the advantages of small incision, less pain at the early postoperative period and fast recovery, it has a certain learning curve, with a longer operation time and more blood loss.

Whether direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty is a risk factor of eccentric reaming to the anterior column of the acetabulum? / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND:Direct anterior approach has been reported to be associated with a risk of reaming the anterior column of the acetabulum,but there is little evidence supporting this opinion.OBJECTIVE:To reveal differences in the bone stock of the anterior and posterior columns between the direct anterior approach and the posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty by CT measurement.METHODS:Sixty cases of primary total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach (n=30) or posterolateral approach (n=30) at Fuzhou Second Hospital of Xiamen University from October 2015 to December 2017 were enrolled.The cross-sectional area of the anterior and posterior column of the acetabulum,the height of the anterior and posterior column,acetabular diameter,and anteversion were measured by CT.All researchers had 5-10 years of clinical experience,and the surgeons were associate chief physicians or above.The trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Fuzhou Second Hospital of Xiamen University on June 1,2017.All patients signed the written informed consents.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1) The postoperative cross-sectional area of the anterior and posterior column of the acetabulum,and the height of the anterior and posterior column in the two groups were less than those at baseline (P ＜ 0.05),the acetabular diameter was larger than that at baseline (P ＜ 0.01),and the anteversion showed no significant difference (P ＞ 0.05).The area of the anterior column in the direct anterior approach group was higher than that in the posterolateral approach group (P ＜ 0.05),and other parameters were insignificantly different between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).(2) in summary,compared with posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty,direct anterior approach leads to increased area of the anterior column,and made no effect on other parameters.Thereafter,direct anterior approach is not a risk factor for eccentric reaming the anterior column of acetabulum,and the conclusion needs to be confirmed by multicenter,prospective randomized controlled trials.

Comparison of the Outcomes after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Short Stem between the Modified Anterolateral Approach and Direct Anterior Approach with a Standard Operation Table / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: Total hip arthroplasty was performed using a direct anterior approach (DAA) on an ordinary operation table and a short femoral stem. The clinical radiographic results were evaluated by a comparison with those performed using the modified hardinge (anterolateral approach, ALA) method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2013 to November 2015, 102 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty using DAA (DAA group) and the same number of patients using ALA (ALA group), both performed by a single surgeon, were compared and analyzed retrospectively. The operation time and amounts of bleeding were compared, and the improvement in post-operative pain, ambulatory capacity and functional recovery of the hip joint were checked. The location of insertion of the acetabular cup and femoral stem were evaluated radiologically, and the complications that occurred in the two groups were investigated. RESULTS: The amount of bleeding was significantly smaller in the DAA group (p=0.018). Up to 3 weeks postoperatively, recovery of hip muscle strength was significantly higher in the DAA group (flexion/extension strength p=0.023, abduction strength p=0.031). The Harris hip score was significantly better in the DAA group for up to 3 months (p<0.001) and the Koval score showed significantly better results in the DAA group up to 6 weeks (p≤0.001). The visual analogue scale score improvement was significantly higher in the DAA group by day 7 (p=0.035). The inclination angle (p<0.001) and anteversion angle (p<0.001) of the acetabular cup were located in the safe zone of the DAA group more than in the ALA group, and there was no statistically significant difference in the position of the femur stem and leg length difference. During surgery, two cases of greater trochanter fracture occurred in the DAA group (p=0.155). CONCLUSION: The DAA performed in the ordinary operation table using a short femoral stem showed post-operative early functional recovery. Because a simple to use fluoroscope was used during surgery with an anatomical position familiar to the surgeon, it is considered to be useful for the insertion of implants into the desired position and for an approach that is useful for the prevention of leg length differences.

Application of arthroscopic surgery combined with direct anterior approach in hip diseases / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Objective: To evaluate the short-term effectiveness of arthroscopic surgery combined with direct anterior approach for hip diseases. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 23 cases with hip diseases (23 hips), who were treated with the arthroscopic surgery combined with direct anterior approach, between January 2015 and December 2016. There were 9 males and 14 females, aged from 27 to 49 years (mean, 38.6 years). There were 11 cases of posterior dislocation of the hip associated with femoral head fracture (Pipkin typeⅠ) and 7 cases of femoral neck fracture (Garden type Ⅳ). And the interval between injury and operation was 2-8 days (mean, 4.3 days). Five cases were osteonecrosis of femoral head at precollapse stage which were rated as stageⅡA according to Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classification system. The disease duration was 3-8 months (mean, 5.9 months). The preoperative Harris hip score, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Postel score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were 57.3±8.2, 11.2±3.6, 3.2±1.5, and 7.2±1.3, respectively. Results: All the wounds healed primarily. Lateral femoral nerve injury occurred in 3 cases. All patients were followed up 8-19 months (mean, 15.6 months). Bone union achieved in all patients after 14-19 weeks (mean, 15.8 weeks) and no secondary osteoarthritis or heterotopic ossification occurred. At last follow-up, the Harris hip score (92.5±5.3), OHS (36.5±5.9), and Postel score (14.2±2.6) were significantly higher than preoperative scores ( t=45.274, P=0.000; t=36.586, P=0.000; t=32.486, P=0.000), and VAS score (1.8±0.9) was significantly lower than preoperative score ( t=21.314, P=0.000). Conclusion: Arthroscopic surgery combined with direct anterior approach for hip diseases can effectively relieve pain, improve hip function, and obtain the satisfactory short-term effectiveness.

Comparison of early rehabilitation effects of total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach versus posterior approach / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Methods: A retrospective analysis was made in the data of 83 patients with unilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head between March 2014 and May 2017. Forty-eight patients were treated with THA via PA (PA group) and 35 patients were treated with THA via DAA (DAA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, stage of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and disease duration between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The length of incision, operation time, total amount of bleeding, the time of first postoperative walking with crutch, the time of first postoperative walking without crutch, the Harris scores, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of 2 group were recorded and compared.

Comparison of the effects of total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach and posterolateral piriformis-sparing approach / 北京大学学报(医学版)

Objective:To compare the clinical effects of direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral piriformis-sparing approach (Mis-PLA) for minimally invasive surgery of total hip arthroplasty.Methods: The patients who had total hip arthroplasty from March 2015 to February 2016 were randomly divided into 2 groups: DAA group and Mis-PLA group.In the study,43 patients (45 hips) were performed with total hip replacement via the direct anterior approach (DAA group).As comparison,39 patients (42 hips) were performed with total hip replacement via the posterolateral piriformis-sparing approach (Mis-PLAgroup) at the same period.DAA group:27 male patients (27 hips),and 16 female patients (18 hips),with an average age of (57.4±7.3) years,preoperative Harris score (41.4±8.7),body mass index(BMI)(24.3±2.2) kg/m2;Mis-PLA group: 25 male patients (26 hips),14 female patients (16 hips),with an average age of (59.2±7.3) years,preoperative Harris score (39.6±8.4),BMI (24.7±2.5) kg/m2.The length of incision,operation time,blood loss,postoperative Harris score were observed and specially the hip functional recovery was fully assessed.Results: (1) All the incisions healed by first intention.No complications were found in both groups.The length of incision:DAA group:(9.2±0.7) cm and Mis-PLA group:(9.5±0.6) cm.No statistical significant differences were found (P=0.053).The operation time:DAA group (74.3±10.1) min and Mis-PLA group(37.5±4.3) min,which showed statistically significant differences(P<0.01).Blood loss:DAA group(229.6±79.2) mL and Mis-PLA group (215.7±56.0) mL.Nostatistical significant differences were found (P=0.366).(2) The patients in both groups were followed up for 6-12 months.The Harris hip scores for 6 weeks' follow-up:(85.5±4.1) in DAA group and (79.0±4.4) in Mis-PLA group,which indicated statistically significant differences (P<0.01).The Harris scores for the 6-month follow-up:(94.3±2.7) in DAA group and (95.2±1.9) in Mis-PLA group.No statistically significant differences were found (P=0.125).The basic daily hip function analysis for the 6-week follow-up:walking speed: no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups(P=0.298);Climbing stairs: Mis-PLA group' outcome was better than DAA group's with statistical differences (P=0.047);Circling,sitting and wearing shoes and socks: outcomes in DAA group exceeded Mis-PLA group's with statistically significant differences (P<0.01,P=0.016,P<0.01).Conclusion: Total hip arthroplasty through either DAA or Mis-PLA approaches could result in very satisfactory clinical effect.Comparing with DAA,Mis-PLA requires less operation time,shorter learning curve,which indicates that it is a re-latively safer approach.The advantages of total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach lie in less positional limitation in the early stage of postoperative period,as well as a faster recovery of hip function.