RESUMO
ABSTRACT Introduction: The combination of non-vascularized iliac crest bone graft and distraction osteogenesis in a second surgical intervention has only been described to achieve alveolar ridge augmentation. This technique is not recommended to treat bone defects of the jaws caused by firearm projectile. Case presentation: 40-year-old woman with a segmental mandibular defect in the mandible body caused by the impact of a firearm projectile at the age of 1 year. The patient developed a severe Class II dentofacial anomaly that required a two-stage treatment; she underwent mandibular reconstruction with free iliac crest bone graft followed by a bilateral mandibular distraction at the level of the iliac crest bone graft. With these interventions, a remarkable improvement of the patient's malformation was achieved. Conclusion: Horizontal distraction of the free iliac crest bone graft is a safe and predictable procedure to treat dentolabial anomalies requiring mandibular reconstruction. This procedure was performed in the patient without complications. Further studies on the effectiveness of this technique are required.
RESUMEN Introducción. La combinación del injerto de la cresta ilíaca no vascularizado y la distracción osteogénica del injerto en una segunda intervención quirúrgica solo ha sido descrita para lograr un aumento del reborde alveolar. Esta técnica no se recomienda para tratar defectos óseos en la mandíbula causados por proyectil de arma de fuego. Presentación del caso. Mujer de 40 años con un defecto mandibular segmentario en el cuerpo mandibular causado por el impacto de un proyectil de arma de fuego a la edad de 1 año. La paciente desarrolló una anomalía dentofacial grave Clase II que requirió dos tratamientos en diferentes momentos: en primer lugar, se le practicó una reconstrucción mandibular con injerto de cresta ilíaca libre y posteriormente, una distracción mandibular bilateral que incluyó un injerto libre de cresta ilíaca. Con estas intervenciones se logró una mejoría notable de la malformación de la paciente. Conclusión. La distracción horizontal del injerto de cresta ilíaca libre es un procedimiento seguro y predecible para tratar anomalías dentolabiales que requieran reconstrucción de la mandíbula; no obstante, es necesario realizar más estudios sobre la efectividad de la técnica frente este tipo de malformaciones.
RESUMO
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the frontal lip cant changes in common facial asymmetry (FA) cases after simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) and mandibular DO with maxillary orthognathic surgery. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of FA cases at tertiary craniofacial referral was performed. Patients of either gender with all medical imaging records and pre‑ and post‑operative (1 year) facial photographs in natural head position were included in the study. The lip cant change was assessed by the ratio of the linear dimension between affected and unaffected side labial commissures and the bi‑pupillary reference line. Difference between the pre‑ and post‑operative ratio was analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed for the outcome. P ≤0.05 was taken as significant. Results: The mean preoperative measured value of the affected side was 0.845 ± 0.036 while the postoperative value was 0.95 ± 0.032. The effective change was 0.11 ± 0.044. The postoperative ratio compared with simultaneous DO case was 0.98 ± 0.06 while that of mandibular distraction with orthognathic surgery was 0.92 ± 0.08 (P = 0.048). The mean change of the simultaneous DO case was measured as 0.114 ± 0.041 while the same for the mandibular distraction with orthognathic surgery was 0.069 ± 0.035 (P = 0.013). Discussion and Conclusion: The results indicate that the simultaneous DO yields more better frontal lip cant change between both halves than the mono‑DO with orthognathic surgery. The mean change is much higher in the simultaneous DO cases indicating a more effective correction and desired result. The biological reason and lip musculature mechanism behind the response in both conditions are discussed.