RESUMO
@#<b>Objective</b> To determine the effectiveness of quality control measures in the laboratory by participating in the national personal dose monitoring ability assessment, and to improve personal dose monitoring ability and quality. <b>Methods</b> According to the requirements of the National Personal Dose Monitoring Ability Assessment Program and standards, seven groups of personal dosimeter were prepared and irradiated by accurate radiation source as requested, and the dose was measured by the laboratory participating in the assessment. The data were processed, and the uncertainty of the measurement results was evaluated. <b>Results</b> In 2018, the assessment results <i>H</i><sub>p</sub> (10) dose range was 0.68-4.27 mSv, the single group performance deviation was −0.01 to −0.06, and the comprehensive performance deviation was 0.04, and the result was qualified. In 2019, the assessment results <i>H</i><sub>p</sub> (10) dose range was 0.74-8.06 mSv, the single group performance deviation was 0.00 to −0.08, and the comprehensive performance deviation was 0.04, and the result was qualified. In 2020, the assessment results <i>H</i><sub>p</sub>(10) dose range was 0.83-3.93 mSv, the single group performance deviation was −0.01 to −0.10, and the comprehensive performance deviation was 0.06, and the result was excellent. <b>Conclusion</b> The personal dose monitoring system in our laboratory runs smoothly, and the monitoring results are accurate and reliable. The laboratory can issue test reports that meet the requirements of national standards.
RESUMO
Objective:To investigate and analyze the eye lens dose to interventional radiology workers in China from 2019 to 2021.Methods:The monitoring data on eye lens dose to interventional radiology workers from 31 province-level units during 2019-2021 were collected through the National Radiological Health Information Platform. The eye lens dose evaluation indicator was Hp(3), with each monitoring period of no more than 3 months. Kusall-Wallis H test was used for the comparison of multiple groups and pairwise. Results:A total of 6 643 interventional radiology workers were investigated from 2019 to 2021. The average annual eye lens dose was 1.03 mSv, with the median of 0.17 mSv and the maximum of 94.88 mSv. The annual eye lens dose to 59 workers exceeded 20 mSv. It was also found that the annual eye lens dose to the doctors in 2019 and 2020 was slightly higher than that to nurses (rank mean difference=118.29, 129.71, P<0.01), and the lens dose to interventional radiology workers who performed cardiac interventions in 2019 was higher than that to workers who performed peripheral vascular interventions (rank mean difference=46.52, P<0.05). Conclusions:The lens dose to interventional radiology workers is lower than the limits given in Chinese national standard currently in effect, but exceed the latest internationally recommended limit for a few ones. In order to protect the occupational health of interventional radiology workers, the monitoring of lens dose should be strengthened.
RESUMO
Objective:To analyze the abnormal dose monitoring result of radiation staff in medical institutions and provide a basis for standardizing the personal dose management of radiation staff in medical institutions.Methods:Through the occupational radiation disease monitoring subsystem of the National Radiation Health Information Platform, 516 individual dose monitoring abnormal result of 410 radiation workers in a single monitoring period, which in 168 medical institutions under the 18 cities in Henan province were collected from 2020 to 2022 as research objects. Based on gender, age, length of service, occupational category, medical institution level, whether the dosimeter wearing standard, the abnormal result of radiation workers were grouped to analyze the influencing factors of individual dose monitoring result.Results:The incidence of abnormal individual dose monitoring result in 2020-2022 was 6.83 × 10 -3, 5.22 × 10 -3 and 6.30 × 10 -3, respectively. Abnormal results were mainly distributed in male radiology workers (66.83%), diagnostic radiology (59.51%) and interventional radiology (34.63%), tertiary (54.39%) and secondary medical institutions (36.34%). In the case of wearing personal dosimeter in a standard or irregular way, there were statistically significant differences in the incidence of abnormal outcomes between different levels of medical institutions and different occupational categories( χ2=14.42, 6.56, 32.96, 177.15, P<0.05). The median annual individual dose of radiology workers with " abnormal exposure dose" due to increased workload was 3.95 mSv, and the annual individual dose of interventional radiology workers was higher than that of radiotherapeutic workers ( Z=5.07, P<0.05). Conclusions:The education and training of radiological protection should be strengthened, and the wearing of individual dosimeters should be standardized; focus on the occupational exposure of interventional radiology staff, and take effective measures to reduce their exposure dose.
RESUMO
Objective:To summarize the levels of individual dose to radiation workers in Shandong province from 2016 to 2020, and to analyze the trends in their change in order to provide scientific basis for radiation workers′ health management.Methods:The experimental detection and quality control were carried out in compliance with the national standards Specifications for individual monitoring of occupational external exposure (GBZ 128-2019) and the Testing criteria of personnel dosimetry performance for external exposure (GBZ 207-2016). The result of the personal dose monitoring of occupational external exposure of all radiation workers monitored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 16 cities of Shandong province were retrospectively analyzed by using SPSS 23.0 software.Results:The total number of monitored workers were 25 523 with an average annual individual effective dose of 0.28 mSv. There were statistically significant differences among radiation workers in different years ( H= 2 815.91, P<0. 001). The average annual individual effective dose showed an upward trend followed by a downward trend. The average annual effective dose of 0.55 mSv for nuclear medicine radiation workers in medical applications was the highest, with statistically significant differences among different occupational radiation workers ( H=310.37, P<0.001). The average annual effective dose of 0.37 mSv for radioactivity logging workers in industrial applications was the highest, with statistically significant differences among different occupational radiation workers ( H=448.07, P<0. 001). The average annual effective dose to radiation workers in medical applications was higher than in industrial applications ( Z = -14.93, P<0.001). Conclusions:The average annual effective dose to nuclear medicine radiation workers in medical applications and logging radiation workers in industrial applications are relatively high. There would be a push to furthe improve workplace protection measures and strengthen the management and supervision of radiological workers.
RESUMO
With the extensive use of neutron sources in industry, medicine, and scientific research, the number of people exposed to neutron has been increasing, which highlights the importance of personal neutron dose monitoring in the field of radiation protection. In the past decades, researchers have developed and improved a variety of techniques and methods for personal neutron dose monitoring. This paper focuses on the problems and research progress of track dosimeters (solid-state nuclear track dosimeters and fluorescent nuclear track dosimeters), luminescent dosimeters (thermoluminescent dosimeters and optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters), and bubble dosimeters in personal neutron dose monitoring.
RESUMO
Objective To preliminarily compare 6LiF-7LiF and CR39 in individual neutron dose monitoring, and to provide a reference for improving individual neutron dose monitoring. Methods According to the GBZ 128-2019, 26 radiation workers from 7 institutions received individual neutron dose monitoring with 6LiF-7LiF and CR39 at the same time. The monitoring results were analyzed. Results For most of the workers, the personal neutron dose equivalent Hp(10) was less than the minimum detectable level. The results with the two monitoring methods differed in 6 of 26 workers. Conclusion Both 6LiF-7LiF and CR39 monitoring methods can be used for individual neutron dose monitoring for radiation workers, but the difference between 6LiF-7LiF and CR39 (in threshold energy, energy response, etc.) should be considered so that different types of radiation workers receive appropriate individual neutron dose monitoring.
RESUMO
Objective To analyze the results of national personal dose monitoring intercomparison and assessment of Hubei Provincial Hospital for Occupational Disease in 2016—2021, to investigate the influencing factors for monitoring results, and to improve the ability of personal dose monitoring. Methods The assessment was completed according to the requirements of The National Comparison Scheme for Individual Dose Monitoring Ability and Testing Criteria of Personnel Dosimetry Performance for External Exposure (GBZ 207—2016). Results The assessment results were qualified in 2016—2017 and 2020 and excellent in 2018—2019 and 2021. Conclusion The ability of personal dose monitoring in our laboratory has been continuously improved. The monitoring results are accurate and the data processing is standardized, which meet the requirements of relevant standards for personal external exposure dose monitoring.
RESUMO
@#<b>Objective</b> To analyze the process of intercomparison of national personal dose monitoring, evaluate the ability of personal dose monitoring, and ensure the accuracy and reliability of monitoring results in our laboratory. <b>Methods</b> In accordance with the intercomparison protocol for 2019—2021, an energy-discriminant thermoluminescence dosimeter was used for measurement at different doses. The uncertainty of measurement was evaluated and compared with the reference value. <b>Results</b> <i>H</i><sub>p</sub>(10) was measured for intercomparison in 2019—2021. In 2019, the single group performance difference was −0.02 to 0.02 and the comprehensive performance was 0.02. These values were 0.02-0.10 and 0.05 in 2020, and −0.02 to 0.02 and 0.01 in 2021. The intercomparison results were rated as excellent in the three consecutive years. <b>Conclusion</b> The personal dose monitoring system in our laboratory was in good condition, and the monitoring results were accurate and reliable. Improving the knowledge of personnel and cultivating a serious working attitude are important for intercomparison and personal dose monitoring.
RESUMO
@#<b>Objective</b> To study whether the disinfection methods for thermoluminescence dosimeters used by major hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on monitoring personal dose of external irradiation, and to screen for the disinfection procedures suitable for use during the pandemic. <b>Methods</b> Hospitals with fever clinics during the epidemic in Shandong Province were selected from March to October 2020, we investigated the disinfection methods as well as the types and frequency of use of disinfection supplies used for thermoluminescence dosimeters during the pandemic in hospitals. Simulations were performed in experimental and control groups. <b>Results</b> The average doses measured by the disc dosimeter with different disinfection methods and the control group were 0.92-0.99 mSv and 0.98 mSv, respectively, and the deviation was ≤ 6%. The average doses measured by the glass tube dosimeter with different disinfection methods and the control group were 0.20-0.22 and 0.21, respectively, and the deviation was ≤ 5%. <b>Conclusion</b> The results showed that the commonly used disinfection methods had no influence on personal dose monitoring, but some disinfection measures were not suitable for dosimeters.
RESUMO
Objective To analyze and compare the data of Yunnan Center for Disease Control and Preventionin national individual dose monitoring ability assessment for external exposure in 2017—2019 and summarize the assessment experience, and to improve monitoring ability and quality. Methods Ability assessment preparation was carried out according to the requirements of The National Comparison Scheme for Individual Dose Monitoring Ability, and blind samples of individual dosimeters were sent. After the blind samples were measured in the laboratory, the results were judged according to the judgment methods in the Testing Criteria of Personnel Dosimetry Performance for External Exposure (GBZ 207—2016) and the requirements of the assessment scheme. Results In 2017, there was a single-group performance of 0.02-0.08 and a comprehensive performance of 0.06, and the results were judged to be qualified. In 2018, there was asingle-group performance of −0.01 to 0.08 and a comprehensive performance of 0.05, and the results were judged to be excellent. In 2019, there was asingle-group performance of −0.13 to −0.04 and a comprehensive performance of 0.08, and the results were judged to be qualified. Conclusion The individual dose monitoring system in our laboratory runs stably, and the monitoring results are accurate and reliable. The quality control measures are effective and feasible.
RESUMO
@#Operational quantities, which are used to estimate protection quantities in the field of radiation protection, are important in area monitoring. The current operational quantities show certain limitations as the particle types and energy ranges are expanded. The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 95 proposed a new system of operational quantities, where the definitions and phantoms of the operational quantities are consistent with the protection quantities, enabling better estimation of the protection quantities over wider ranges of particle types and energies. This paper focuses on the effects of the new recommended operational quantity system in area monitoring from the aspects of phantom application, conversion coefficient updating, and monitor design and calibration.
RESUMO
@#<b>Objective</b> To analyze the monitoring results of external exposure dose of interventional radiology staff in a tertiary general hospital in Beijing, China, 2018—2020, and to provide a basis for safe guarding staff health and hospital radiation protection management. <b>Methods</b> A total of 321 interventional radiology staff in a hospital in Beijing were selected to collect information on the types of interventional work, positions, and personal dose monitoring results in 2018—2020. The dose monitoring results were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. <b>Results</b> The effective monitoring rate for the three years was 78.82%, 81.65%, and 96.85%, respectively, showing an increasing trend (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup><sub> trend</sub> = 16.134, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The annual dose equivalent per capita was 0.142, 0.142, and 0.265 mSv, respectively. The annual dose equivalent per capita in 2020 was significantly higher than those in 2018 (<i>H</i> = 24.562, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 2019 (<i>H</i> = 39.378, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The annual dose equivalent per capita in 2020 was in the order of interventional clinician > interventional nurse > technician (<i>H</i> = 10.699, 6.562, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The annual dose equivalent per capitain 2020 was higher in the cardiology interventional department than in the comprehensive interventional, neuro interventional, and vascular surgery departments (<i>H</i> = 35.530, 37.614, 35.496, <i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b> The number of interventional radiology staff monitored from 2018 to 2020 increased year by year, so did the effective monitoring rate.The external exposure dose was at low levels, which generally meets the requirements of national occupational exposure limits. Training on radiation protection for interventional radiology staff should be further strengthened to raise awareness of radiation protection.
RESUMO
In case of accidental exposure, a rapid assessment of radiation dose is of great significance for taking timely countermeasures. Finding an alternative portable emergency dosimeter is crucial for people who have been exposed to accidental radiation but are not equipped with a personal dosimeter. In addition, the real-time monitoring of radiation dose level in the normal environment can meet the needs of the public to know their health status in time. Thus, the portability and intelligence of mobile phones attract researchers to carry out related work. This article reviews the research progress in individual exposure dose estimation and monitoring based on mobile phones.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the personal dose level of occupational external exposure among interventional radiology workers in Liaoning Province of China, and to provide a reference for better occupational radiation protection. Methods According to the national standard GBZ 128—2016 Specifications for individual monitoring of occupational external exposure, the thermoluminescence method was used to measure the monitoring dose inside the lead clothes (HW) and outside the lead clothes (HN) of interventional radiology workers, and the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis H test were used for statistical analysis. Results Dual dosimeter monitoring data were collected from 307 interventional radiology workers in Liaoning Province in 2019, with a mean annual effective dose of 0.81 mSv and a maximum annual effective dose of 7.03 mSv, and 72.96% of the workers monitored had an annual effective dose of less than 1 mSv. The interventional radiology workers in tertiary hospitals had a significantly higher mean annual effective dose than those in secondary hospitals (0.95 mSv vs 0.65 mSv, P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in mean annual effective dose between departments (P < 0.05), and the department of interventional radiology had a significantly higher mean annual effective dose than the other departments (0.92 mSv vs 0.64 mSv), while the department of cardiology had a similar mean annual effective dose to the cerebrovascular department (0.78 mSv vs 0.78 mSv). Conclusion The occupational exposure dose of 307 interventional radiology workers in Liaoning Province meets the requirements in national regulations and standards and is higher than the national level, which suggests that radiation protection supervision and personal training should be further strengthened for interventional radiology.
RESUMO
Objective In 2019, Laboratory of Shanghai Chongming Center for Disease Control and Prevention participated in national assessment of individual dose monitoring capability. By analyzing the results, this report summarizes the experience and shortcomings that will help improve the individual dose monitoring capability of the laboratory. Methods According to the requirements of the national assessment scheme for individual dose monitoring capacity in 2019, the assessment process and results were sorted out and analyzed one by one. Results The single group performance deviations(Pi values)between the measured values and references of the five groups were -0.04, -0.07, -0.05, -0.04 and -0.06, respectively. The overall bias(B value)of all groups was 0.003. According to the judgment standards, both the single group performance and overall performance were all qualified. Conclusion The individual dose monitoring system of the laboratory meets the requirements of the relevant national standards. The individual dose monitoring capability can be further improved by strengthening the quality control of the relevant procedures of the assessment.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate and analyze the cause of the abnormal results in the individual dose monitoring conducted by this laboratory from 2014 to 2017. Methods Radiologic workers wear personal thermoluminescent dosimeters to monitor the individual dose equivalent HP(10). A statistical analysis is conducted on the results above the investigation level. Results During the time when our individual dose monitoring was conducted from 2014 to 2017, this laboratory had detected 69 person-time abnormal results in 40 workplaces, of which 83% occurred in the profession of diagnostic roentgenology. 54% of the dose level range from 1.25 to 5.00 mSv. The main causes of the abnormal results include improper wearing of personal dosimeters (67%), unknown causes (20%), increased workload (10%) and equipment maintenance (3.0%)etc. Conclusion Radiation workplaces should enhance the management of radiologic workers, improve their trainings on radiation protection and raise their protection awareness.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the reasons why the routine monitoring of personal dose of occupational external exposure of some radiological workers in our province reached the investigation level in 2018, so as to provide technical support for the correct decision making of administrative departments. Methods The registration forms for monitoring and verifying the personal dose of occupational external exposure were issued to radiation workers whose periodic dose reached or exceeded 1.25 mSv/ cycle. Results A total of 102 person-times were sent out in 53 verification forms, and 95 person-times were collected in 47 copies. The recovery rate was 88.68%, and 7 person-times did not feedback the verification forms. There were 15 cases of actual exposure, accounting for 15.79%, including 5 cases of radiological diagnostic staff, who did not close the protective door when operating exposure. Among them, the other 80 cases, accouting for 84.21% didn't receive actual exposure. Conclusion The vast majority of radiological workers who reached the survey level didn't receive actual exposure. 5 person-time radiological diagnostic staff, during the work did not close the protective door, subjected to abnormal radiation. Interventional medicine, nuclear medicine and industrial mobile flaw detection workers are at higher risk of abnormal exposures during their work. The suspicious results of the questionnaires without feedback were all less than the annual dose limit and the requirements of audit management. We will strengthen supervision of radiation health protection, raise the awareness of radiation protection among radiation workers, and improve radiation protection management and protection conditions for radiation workers in interventional medicine, nuclear medicine and industrial mobile flaw detection furtherly.
RESUMO
Objective To analyze the abnormal results of individual dose monitoring of some radiation workers in Chengdu from 2016 to 2018, so as to take corresponding measures to avoid similar abnormal situations. Methods The individual dose was monitored by thermoluminescence method, and the monitoring results were analyzed by spss19.0 statistical software. Results From 2016 to 2018, the number of people with abnormal dose was basically the same, and there was no significant difference in the number of people with abnormal dose in different years (P > 0.05); the number of people engaged in diagnostic radiology with abnormal personal dose accounted for 75.96%; the first reason for the abnormal personal dose was that "the personal dosimeter had been left in the radiation workplace", accounting for 92.55%. Conclusion The main reason for the abnormal results is that the dosimeter is not worn properly, so the management should be further strengthened.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the status of radiological protection in Baoji City. Methods Using the questionnaire survey method, the survey forms were sent to the radiology clinics and other relevant units in the counties and districts of the city to investigate the basic situation of radiology and treatment of medical and health institutions, basic information of radiology and treatment equipment, personal information of radiation workers, and health monitoring of radiation workers. Results There is 1.13 X-ray diagnostic equipment per 10, 000 people, 0.015 radiotherapy equipment per 10, 000 people in Baoji City, and One million people own 11.4 CTs. There are 1, 102 radiation workers in Baoji City, and 2.92 per 10, 000 people. The occupational health check rate of medical radiation personnel was 87.7% within 2 years, the personal dose monitoring rate was 90.4%, the radiation worker training rate was 73.6% within 2 years, about the holding rate of "Radiation Staff Certificate" in Baoji City was 73.0%, and the occupational health file rate was 89.2%. The evaluation indexes of various health monitoring were lower, especially in township hospitals (35.7%～50.8%). Conclusion On the whole, the number of radiological diagnosis and treatment equipment is small, and Class A large equipment is almost blank. The city is stronger than the county in health monitoring. The status of health monitoring is very different from urban to rural areas.
RESUMO
Objective:To analyze distributions of dose range, occupational category, and causes of abnormal dose values from individual dose monitoring of radiation workers and to provide recommendations for improving the quality of individual monitoring data and occupational health management in medical institutions.Methods:The data of individual dose monitoring result exceeding 1.25 mSv in a single monitoring cycle, collected by Occupational Health System for Radiology Facilities’ on National Radiological Health Information Platform, was analyzed.Results:A total of 1 113 abnormal dose values were detected in 31 provinces in 2020, with an abnormal rate of 2.48‰, of which workers of diagnostic radiology and interventional radiology accounted for 68.01% and 18.78%, respectively. The dose distribution of abnormal dose values was mainly between 1.25 and 5 mSv. The abnormal dose values were mainly caused by improperly wearing or using personal dosimeters, accounting for 63.88%. Workers for whom the dose values was abnormal due to increased workload accounted for 12.32%, with an average annual individual dose of 5.14 mSv. There was no statistically significant difference in annual individual dose among radiation workers between different occupational groups( P>0.05). Conclusions:Education and training on radiation protection for radiation workers should be strengthened, and a specific and feasible system for radiation protection management, as well as a reward and punishment system, should be established in order to reduce the occurance of the improper wearing of personal dosimeters. Great attention should be paid to occupational exposure of workers in diagnostic radiology and interventional radiology, and a work shift system should be conducted to reduce individual dose levels. It is recommended that standard verification procedures for abnormal dose values from individual dose monitoring should be developed to improve the quality of individual monitoring data.