RESUMO
Objective To summarize the clinical treatment experience of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection after renal transplantation in donation after cardiac death (DCD) era. Methods Clinical data of 10 donors and 17 recipients with CRKP infection after DCD renal transplantation from January 2015 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Both donors and recipients received bacterial culture and drug sensitivity test. Clinical manifestations, treatment and outcome of CRKP-infected recipients were recorded. Results Seven donors were infected with CRKP. After pretreatment, CRKP in 2 cases turned negative, CRKP in 5 donors did not turn negative. All renal grafts were treated with tigecycline+meropenem+voriconazole lavage to prevent infection. Among 17 recipients with CRKP infection, 11 cases were positive for blood culture, 10 positive for urine culture, 3 positive for sputum culture, 3 positive for incisional secretion and 3 positive for retroperitoneal drainage. Clinical manifestations included fever in 8 cases, rupture and hemorrhage of the transplant renal artery in 7 cases or thrombosis in the transplant renal artery in 1 case, bladder irritation sign in 3 cases and cough with brick red jelly-like sputum in 1 case, respectively. Five patients were treated with tigecycline+meropenem, 1 patient suffered from renal graft loss and 4 recipients died. Twelve patients were treated with ceftazidime-avibactam +meropenem, 3 patients presented with renal graft loss and 1 recipient died. Conclusions CRKP-infected donor is not the absolute contraindication of renal transplantation. Pretreatment of donor infection and early administration of sufficient sensitive antibiotics can cure CRKP infection and improve the clinical prognosis of renal transplant recipients.
RESUMO
The discovery of penicillin has effectively controlled the infection caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Afterwards, the research and development of antibacterial drugs has entered the golden age, and made a great contribution to human health. However, in recent years, with the increasing use of antibiotics around the world, pathogenic bacteria drive gene mutation to obtain drug resistance to ensure its survival advantage, and promote the transfer of drug-resistant genes, resulting in a sharp increase of drug-resistant bacteria. In addition, the current development speed of new antibiotics is far slower than the growth and spread speed of drug-resistant bacteria, which makes the drug-resistant crisis more serious and becomes one of the biggest threats to the global community. Compared with the same type of bacterial infection, drug-resistant bacterial infection has the characteristics of complexity and refractoriness, which causes worse clinical outcome and higher risk of death in patients, and brings severe challenges to clinical work. If the trend of bacterial drug resistance is not controlled, the crisis of no drug available will come. Therefore, it is urgent to explore effective alternative means to fight against bacterial drug resistance and reduce the harm of drug-resistant bacterial infection. Traditional Chinese medicine（TCM） has unique advantages in the treatment of infectious diseases. Compared with modern antibacterial drugs, it has the characteristics of wide sources, rich active ingredients, and is not easy to produce drug resistance. It may be an important source for screening and developing new anti-infective drugs. Therefore, it is promising to develop and utilize TCM to solve the problem of drug-resistant bacteria infection. This paper will review relevant studies in recent years in terms of interfering with the biochemical metabolism of drug-resistant bacteria to directly inhibit or kill drug-resistant bacteria, improving bacterial drug resistance to indirectly inhibit bacteria and kill bacteria, and maintaining the balance of the body and regulating the treatment of drug-resistant bacteria infection as a whole, so as to provide references for guiding clinical medication and research and development of new traditional Chinese medicines.
RESUMO
Objective To explore the safety application of organs from infectious donors. Methods Clinical data of 67 donors and recipients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. According to the occurrence of infections and infection sites in donors, all recipients were divided into the bloodstream infection group (n=16, donors with non-drug resistant bacterial infections), non-bloodstream infection group (n=20, donors with other site infections) and non-infection group (n=31). Perioperative clinical parameters including preoperative model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, operative time, anhepatic phase, intraoperative blood loss and intraoperative blood transfusion were statistically compared among three groups. The recovery of liver function and coagulation function in the recipients was observed at postoperative 1, 3, 7, 14 and 21 d. The incidence rate of complications and mortality rate in the recipients were recorded within 1 month after liver transplantation. The recovery of postoperative infection-related parameters including white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil pet (NE%) and procalcitonin (PCT) level in the recipients was observed. The application rate and application time of restricted antibiotics were recorded. Results Perioperative clinical parameters in the recipients did not significantly differ among three groups (all P > 0.05). At each time point after liver transplantation, the liver function, coagulation function, incidence rate of complications and mortality rate in the recipients did not significantly differ among three groups (all P > 0.05). The NE% of recipients at postoperative 3 and 7 d in the bloodstream infection group was significantly higher than those in non-bloodstream infection and non-infection groups (all P < 0.05). The PCT levels of recipients at postoperative 3, 7 and 14 d in the bloodstream infection group were significantly higher than those in the non-bloodstream infection and non-infection groups (all P < 0.05). The application rate and application time of restricted antibiotics in the recipients with bloodstream infections were significantly higher or longer than their counterparts in the non-bloodstream infection and non-infection groups (all P < 0.05). Conclusions It is safe to apply liver grafts from donors with bloodstream infection of non-drug resistant bacteria or other site infections when antibiotics are applied as early as possible.