RESUMO
Introdução: A cefaleia pós punção dural (CPPD) é uma complicação da punção lombar, um procedimento que, apesar de bem tolerado, está sujeito a adversidades, ocorrendo devido a um vazamento persistente do líquido cefalorraquidiano (LCR) do local da punção dural. A incidência de CPPD pode estar relacionada às características dos pacientes e dos procedimentos. Notou-se que em mulheres jovens até 30 anos, o risco de CPPD é maior quando comparado aos homens, não apresentando diferença a partir da quinta década de vida. Objetivo: investigar os diferentes sintomas e efeitos gerados pelos diferentes tipos de agulha, como calibre e modo de inserção, que visem reduzir a CPPD. Métodos: Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática de literatura realizada no período de 2 de agosto a 20 de novembro de 2023 por meio de pesquisas no PubMed. Foram utilizados os descritores: "Post-Dural Puncture Headache" e suas variações do MeSH, sendo submetidos aos critérios de inclusão: estudos em humanos, nos últimos 10 anos, ensaios clínicos e ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados. Para garantir a qualidade da revisão sistemática foi aplicada a lista de verificação PRISMA de 2020. Resultados: Após investigação estatística, observou-se que as agulhas 25W e 25S demandaram maior tempo médio para a coleta de LCR (15 e 7 min, respectivamente). Ao se comparar 25W com 20Q (3 min), 22S (5 min) e 25S quanto à esta variável, observouse diferença significativa em todas as comparações. Conclusão: As agulhas do tipo atraumática foram associadas com redução do risco de desenvolvimento de CPPD quando comparadas às convencionais. Foi constatado que, dentre as agulhas convencionais, a traumática de 25G é melhor para a prevenção de CPPD que a de 22G.
Introduction: Post-Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is a complication of lumbar puncture, a procedure that, despite being well-tolerated, is subject to adversities, occurring due to a persistent leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the site of dural puncture. The incidence of PDPH may be related to patient and procedural characteristics. It has been noted that in young women up to 30 years old, the risk of CPPD is higher compared to men, with no difference between sexes from the fifth decade of life onward. Objective: To investigate the different symptoms and effects generated by different types of needles, such as gauge and insertion method, aiming to reduce CPPD. Methods: Is a systematic literature review conducted from August to October 2023 through searches on PubMed. The descriptors "Post-Dural Puncture Headache" and its MeSH variations were used. A total of 1,839 articles were found, which were then subjected to inclusion criteria: studies conducted in the last 10 years, controlled trials, and randomized clinical trials. Results: After statistical investigation, it was observed that the 25W and 25S needles required a longer average time for cerebrospinal fluid collection (15 and 7 minutes, respectively). When comparing 25W with 20Q (3 minutes), 22S (5 minutes), and 25S regarding this variable, a significant difference was observed in all comparisons. Conclusion: Atraumatic needles were associated with a reduction in the risk of developing CPPD compared to conventional needles. It was found that among conventional needles, the traumatic 25G needle is better for preventing CPPD than the 22G needle.
RESUMO
Background: Post-dural puncture headache is a complication of regional blocks that results from intentional dural puncture during spinal anesthesia and unintentional dural puncture during epidural anesthesia. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence, common clinical presentations and severity of post-spinal puncture headache among parturients who underwent cesarean section using spinal anesthesia in western Uganda. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 249 mothers who were consecutively enrolled in their 3rd post-partum day during the period from April 2022 to July 2022 from postnatal ward of Fort portal Regional Referral Hospital. The data needed for analysis was gathered using pretested questionnaires. Data was entered into microsoft excel version 16, coded and transported into SPSS version 22 for analysis. Descriptive statistics was carried out using SPSS version 22.0. Results: The prevalence of post-dural puncture headache among parturients who underwent cesarean section using spinal anesthesia was 81 (32.5%). Commonest clinical presentation being front/back headache 59 (72.8%), worsened with upright posture 81 (100%), coughing/sneezing 81 (100%) and improved on lying flat position 81 (100%). The commonest form was mild one 35 (43.2%). Conclusions: This study revealed a high prevalence of post-dural puncture headache as compared to studies done in the region which mainly presented as frontal/back with the commonest form being mild.
RESUMO
Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) remains a prominent clinical concern to the present day and common complication seen in the field of anesthesiology and pain medicine. Identification of such risk factors is a crucial step in the rational modification of anesthetic practice and evaluation of therapeutic interventions. This study was conducted to demonstrate the incidence and risk factors of PDPH in patients after spinal Anesthesia during three days' post operations at general hospital in Tripoli, Libya. In this study certain factors related to patient history, baseline clinical state or anesthetic technique might be associated with an increased risk for this side effect, so it was collected historical, physiologic, and technical data to determine their association with PDPH. Out of total of 100 patients distributed over 5 different hospitals admitted over a period (from November 2020 to April 2021) 27% of them have a PDPH, while 92.5% of cases with PDPH are females, that 55.6% of PDPH cases are between 20 and 25 years old, and this percentage getting smaller as patients get older, most of the operations were caesarean section, at a rate of 58%, followed by lower abdominal surgeries with 19% of cases, and orthopedic surgeries with 17% of cases, while the lowest percentage was for the Urologic surgeries. 55% of cases with PDPH are classified as (case I), and 44% of them are classified as (case II), 81.5% of PDPH cases used noncutting needles. In this study the PDPH remains the most problem in hospitalized patients after spinal Anesthesia at Tripoli hospitals can be caused by variety of risk factors, associated with ASA physical states, nonprofessional technique, the females are more common than males and the percentage increasing in early age group
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Cefaleia Pós-Punção DuralRESUMO
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of trans-nasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion (SPG) block over other treatments for Post-Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) management. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on databases for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing trans-nasal SPG blockade for the management of PDPH over other treatment modalities. All outcomes were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method and random effect model. Analyses of all outcomes were performed as a subgroup based on the type of control interventions (conservative, intranasal lignocaine puffs, sham, and Greater Occipital Nerve [GON] block). The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Results: After screening 1748 relevant articles, 9 RCTs comparing SPG block with other interventions (6 conservative treatments, 1 sham, 1 GON and 1 intranasal lidocaine puff) were included in this meta-analysis. SPG block demonstrated superiority over conservative treatment in pain reduction at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h after interventions and treatment failures with "very low" to "moderate" quality of evidence. The SPG block failed to demonstrate superiority over conservative treatment in pain reduction beyond 6 h, need for rescue treatment, and adverse events. SPG block demonstrated superiority over intranasal lignocaine puff in pain reduction at 30 min, 1 h, 6 h, and 24 h after interventions. SPG block did not show superiority or equivalence in all efficacy and safety outcomes as compared to sham and GON block. Conclusion: Very Low to moderate quality evidence suggests the superiority of SPG block over conservative treatment and lignocaine puff for short-term pain relief from PDPH. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021291707.
Assuntos
Humanos , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural/terapia , Bloqueio do Gânglio Esfenopalatino/métodos , Dor , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , LidocaínaRESUMO
Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), formerly known as post-lumbar puncture headache, is a well-known adverse event that follows diagnostic and/or therapeutic puncture of the dura, or accidentally, following spinal anesthesia. Material & Methods: This prospective study was carried out on 152 patients at Shaheed Ziaur Rahman Medical College Hospital in Bogura, from 2013 to 2015 and North Bengal Medical College from 2016 to 2022, Bangladesh. Results: A total of 152 patients were enrolled into the study where 122(80.3%) were aged between 18-28 years, 30(19.7%) were 29-39 years, 38(25%) were male and 114(75%) were female. 122(80.3%) patients were non obese (<25) and 30(19.7%) were obese (>25). 17(11.2%) patients had previous history of anaesthesia and 17(11.2%) had previous history of PDPH. On majority 100 patients were used big size needle (18-23 G) and rest of the patients were used small (23-25G). 146 (96.1%) patients position was lateral and 92(60.5%) were used less than two or equal three drops. 61(40.1%) patients were needed one attempt, 64(42.1%) were needed two and 27(27.8%) were needed greater than two. The prevalence of PDPH was found in 44(28.9%) cases out of 152 where severity of 29(65.9%) percent was mild, 20(45.5%) cases headache onset were at the first day and mean duration of headache was 2.6. There was a statistically significant association between development of PDPH and younger age (26.3±8.7 years vs 32.6±7.4, p< 0.001), female gender (p=00.009), previous history of PDPH (p<0.001), number of attempts (3.1±1.2 vs 1.2±0.8, p<0.001), small needles (p=0.04), pre LP headache (p<0.001) and CSF RBS (2.6±2.1 vs 13.8±1.3, p= 0.48). Conclusion: This study recommends that the neurologists should be treating this population in the manner so that it may help to prevent this painful adverse event, and identification of risk variables is vital in predicting PDPH.
RESUMO
Abstract Dural puncture is either diagnosed by unexpectedly profound response to medication test dose or development of a postpartum postural headache. Epidural blood patch is the gold standard for treatment of PDPH when conservative management fails. However, postpartum headaches can be resistant to multiple epidural blood patches. In such cases, preexisting intracranial processes should be considered and ruled out. We report here the unique case of a pregnant patient who developed a resistant headache in the postpartum period related to an incidental intracranial aneurysm. Subsequent treatment with endovascular embolization adequately relieved her symptoms. Early surgical consultation and a multidisciplinary team approach involving neurology and neuroimaging is required for successful management of patients such as the one described here.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural/terapia , Punção Espinal/efeitos adversos , Placa de Sangue Epidural/métodos , Período Pós-Parto , Anestesiologistas , Cefaleia/etiologiaRESUMO
Objective:To determine the 50% effective concentration (EC 50) of ropivacaine plus sufentanil for labor analgesia using the dural puncture epidural technique. Methods:Using the method of prospective study, sixty parturients requiring labor analgesia in Dalian Women and Children′s Medical Group from May 2021 to May 2022 were divided into six groups using a random number table and administered 0.3 mg/L sufentanil and ropivacaine at different concentrations: 0.05% (group D1), 0.06% (group D2), 0.07% (group D3), 0.08% (group D4), 0.09% (group D5), and 0.1% (group D6). A probit model was constructed to compute the EC 50 values and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of ropivacaine plus sufentanil in dural puncture epidural analgesia (DPEA) for labor. The pain intensity of uterine contractions before labor analgesia and 30 min after administration was recorded and assessed on a numeric rating scale (NRS), and decreases in blood pressures and heart rates, vomiting and nausea, postpartum headaches, and fetal bradycardia were documented. Results:When using ropivacaine plus sufentanil for labor analgesia via DPE, the EC 50 was 0.061%, and the 95% CI ranged from 0.051 to 0.067; the 90% effective concentration (EC 90) was 0.081%, and the 95% CI was between 0.074 and 0.098. Among the six groups, there was one case of fetal bradycardia in group D3 and one case of decreased heart rates in group D4. No decreased blood pressure, vomiting and nausea, or postpartum headaches were reported. Conclusions:In DPEA for labor, ropivacaine plus sufentanil has an EC 50 of 0.061%, with the 95% CI falling between 0.051 and 0.067, similar to the EC 50 value in epidural analgesia.
RESUMO
Introduction:Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is defined as an orthostatic headache that develops within the first few days after performing a spinal tap and it is related to extravasation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) into the epidural space, resulting in CSF hypovolemia and hypotension. The risk factors for PDPH are not yet fully understood. Objective:To evaluate the risk of spontaneously reported PDPH according to the size and type of spinal tap needle. Methods:A total of 4589 patients undergoing outpatient lumbar puncture (LP) were included. All CSF collections were performed at Senne Liquor Diagnostico, a laboratory specialized in CSF collection and analysis. Patients were instructed to report by telephone if they had orthostatic headache during the first 7 days after LP to the medical team of the laboratory. Patients with previous headache were instructed to report any change in the headache pattern during the same period. Needle gauge was classified into two groups: 1) 25 G or less and 2) greater than 25 G. Two types of needles were used and compared: 1) Pencil point and 2) Quincke. Comparisons of the percentages of spontaneous reports of PDPH were made using the chi-square test. Results:141 patients (3.07%) reported PDPH to the laboratory's medical team. Needles of 25G gauge or less were used in 31.8% of cases. The percentage of patients reporting PHD in the group of 25G or less needles was 1.9% versus 3.6% in the group of larger than 25G needles (p=0.003). Pencil point needles were used in 10.6% of cases. The percentage of PHD among pencil point group was 1.4% versus 3.2% in Quincke group (p=0.026). Conclusion:25 G or finer gauge needles as well as pencil point type needles significantly reduced the risk of spontaneously reported PHD.
Introdução: A cefaleia pós-punção dural (CPPD) é definida como uma cefaleia ortostática que se desenvolve nos primeiros dias após a realização de uma punção lombar e está relacionada ao extravasamento de líquido cefalorraquidiano (LCR) para o espaço peridural, resultando em hipovolemia do LCR e hipotensão. Os fatores de risco para CPPD ainda não são totalmente compreendidos. Objetivo:Avaliar o risco de CPPD relatada espontaneamente de acordo com o tamanho e tipo de agulha de punção lombar. Métodos: Foram incluídos 4.589 pacientes submetidos à punção lombar (PL) ambulatorial. Todas as coletas de LCR foram realizadas no Senne Liquor Diagnostico, laboratório especializado em coleta e análise de LCR. Os pacientes foram orientados a relatar por telefone à equipe médica do laboratório se apresentassem cefaleia ortostática nos primeiros 7 dias após a PL. Pacientes com cefaleia prévia foram orientados a relatar qualquer alteração no padrão de cefaleia durante o mesmo período. O calibre da agulha foi classificado em dois grupos: 1) 25 G ou menos e 2) maior que 25 G. Dois tipos de agulhas foram utilizados e comparados: 1) ponta de lápis e 2) Quincke. As comparações dos percentuais de notificações espontâneas de CPPD foram feitas por meio do teste do qui-quadrado. Resultados:141 pacientes (3,07%) relataram CPPD à equipe médica do laboratório. Agulhas de calibre 25G ou menos foram utilizadas em 31,8% dos casos. A porcentagem de pacientes que relataram HDP no grupo de agulhas 25G ou menos foi de 1,9% versus 3,6% no grupo de agulhas maiores que 25G (p=0,003). Agulhas com ponta de lápis foram utilizadas em 10,6% dos casos. O percentual de DPH no grupo ponta de lápis foi de 1,4% versus 3,2% no grupo Quincke (p=0,026). Conclusão: Agulhas de calibre 25 G ou mais fino, bem como agulhas tipo ponta de lápis reduziram significativamente o risco de HP relatado espontaneamente.
RESUMO
Abstract Post-dural puncture headache is a frequent complication in neuraxial approaches. It may result in disability, healthcare dissatisfaction and potentially serious complications. The traditional initial management includes general and analgesia measures with poor evidence. The treatment approach best supported by the literature is the epidural blood patch for which rates of up 70% improvement have been reported. Regional techniques have been recently described that may be helpful because they are less invasive than the epidural blood patch, under certain clinical circumstances. This article suggests an algorithm that uses such techniques for the management of this complication.
Resumen La cefalea pospunción dural es una complicación frecuente del abordaje del neuroeje. Puede producir incapacidad, insatisfacción con la atención en salud y complicaciones potencialmente graves. Tradicionalmente su manejo inicial incluye medidas generales y de analgesia las cuales tienen baja evidencia. La medida para su tratamiento, con mejor soporte en la literatura, es la realización de parche hemático, el cual informa tazas de mejoría hasta del 70 %. Recientemente se han descrito técnicas regionales, que pueden resultar útiles por ser menos invasivas que el parche hemático, en ciertos contextos clínicos. En este artículo se propone un algoritmo que permite incorporar dichas técnicas al manejo de esta complicación.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Terapêutica , Placa de Sangue Epidural , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural , Cefaleia , Analgesia , Bloqueio Nervoso , Atenção à Saúde , Anestesia por ConduçãoRESUMO
Introducción: La cefalea posterior a la punción de la duramadre es una complicación que se describió conjuntamente con la primera anestesia neuroaxial. Es un cuadro clínico complejo, que con la terapéutica adecuada mejora rápidamente, pero en ocasiones persiste a pesar de los esfuerzos realizados por el equipo médico encargado de tratarla. Objetivo: Describir la evolución clínica de un caso cefalea pospunción dural. Discusión: Se presenta un caso que después de realizarle a una anestesia subaracnoidea para una cirugía de Hallux Varus, sufre una cefalea pospunción dural que persistió por más de 18 días, a pesar de los tratamientos impuestos, tanto conservadores (terapia farmacológica, hidratación, reposo) como intervencionista (hemoparche peridural y colchón hídrico, con dextran 40), el cuadro desapareció por si solo pasado el tiempo expuesto anteriormente. Conclusiones: Se concluye que este cuadro clínico ocasionado por la punción de la duramadre es de resolución rápida con el tratamiento adecuado, pero existen casos en los que a pesar de la terapéutica indicada puede persistir por más tiempo(AU)
Introduction: Headache after dura mater puncture is a complication described together with the first neuraxial anesthesia. A complex clinical picture improves rapidly with adequate therapy, but sometimes persists despite the efforts made by the medical team in charge of treating it. Objective: To describe the clinical evolution of case of postdural puncture headache. Discussion: A case is presented of a patient who, following subarachnoid anesthesia for hallux varus surgery, suffered postdural puncture headache that persisted for more than eighteen days, despite the treatments used, both conservative (pharmacological therapy, hydration, rest) and interventionist (peridural hemopatch and water mattress, with dextran 40). The clinical picture disappeared by itself after the time previously discussed. Conclusions: It is concluded that this clinical picture caused by the dura mater puncture is of rapid resolution if treated appropriately, but there are cases in which, despite the indicated therapy, it may persist for a longer time(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamento Farmacológico , Dura-Máter , Hallux Varus , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural , Evolução ClínicaRESUMO
Abstract Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is an iatrogenic condition following lumbar puncture (LP). Incidence is variable and often associated with young females. Technical features of the procedure (i.e. needle gauge) have been investigated; however there is no investigation on the method of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection. Objective: To investigate whether mild CSF aspiration is associated with increased PDPH in selected patients. Methods: 336 subjects were eligible to the study. Data on 237 patients from a tertiary neurology hospital who underwent diagnostic LP from February 2010 to December 2012 were analysed. Patient demographics, lumbar puncture method, CSF biochemical characteristics, opening pressures, and a follow-up inquire on PDPH occurrence were collected. CSF was collected either by allowing free flow or by mild aspiration. Results: The aspiration arm (n=163) was comprised of 55.8% females with mean age of 52(35‒69) years. Sex distribution was not different between the two arms (p=0.191). A significant larger amount of CSF was obtained in the aspiration arm (p=0.011). The incidence of PDPH in the aspiration arm was 16.5% versus 20.2% in the free flow arm, not statistically significant (p=0.489). No relevant associations emerged from the analyses in the subgroup aged <65 years. Conclusions: Aspiration of the CSF during LP was not associated with increased rates of PDPH compared to the standard method, particularly when larger amounts of CSF are required and ideal conditions are met. This is the first study looking into this matter, aiming to add safety to the procedure. Further randomized trials are required.
Resumo Introdução: Cefaleia pós-punção dural (CPPD) é uma condição iatrogênica após punção lombar (LP). Incidência é variável; frequentemente associada a mulheres jovens. Características técnicas do procedimento (ex: calibre da agulha) foram investigadas; no entanto, não há investigação sobre o método de coleta do líquido cefalorraquidiano (LCR). Objetivo: Avaliar se aspiração leve do LCR está associada ao aumento da CPPD em pacientes selecionados. Métodos: 336 indivíduos foram elegíveis para o estudo. Dados de 237 pacientes em um hospital neurológico terciário que foram submetidos à PL diagnóstica de fevereiro de 2010 a dezembro de 2012 foram analisados. Coletamos dados demográficos dos pacientes, método da PL, características bioquímicas do LCR, pressões de abertura e ocorrência da CPPD. Todos as PLs ocorreram em decúbito lateral. O LCR foi coletado permitindo livre fluxo ou aspiração leve. Resultados: O grupo aspiração (n=163) apresentava 55,8% de mulheres, idade média de 52(35‒69) anos. A distribuição por sexo não foi diferente entre os dois grupos (p=0,191). Uma quantidade maior de LCR foi obtida no grupo aspiração (p=0,011). A incidência de CPPD no grupo de aspiração foi de 16,5% versus 20,2% no fluxo livre, não estatisticamente significante (p=0,489). Nenhuma associação emergiu das análises no subgrupo com idades <65 anos. Conclusões: A aspiração do LCR durante PL não está associada ao aumento da CPPD em comparação com a método padrão, particularmente quando quantidades maiores de LCR são necessárias e condições ideais são satisfeitas. Este é o primeiro estudo a investigar o topico, visando aumentar a segurança do procedimento. Necessita-se futuros estudos randomizados.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural , Punção Espinal , Incidência , Estudos Prospectivos , AgulhasRESUMO
Introducción: El abordaje del espacio subaracnoideo fue descrito por Quincke en el 1891. En la actualidad es práctica común para la realización de la anestesia neuroaxial subaracnoidea en las pacientes obstétricas. Las complicaciones descritas, asociadas a esto, son varias. Dentro de estas, la parálisis del nervio abducens o VI par no es frecuente y en ocasiones, no está relacionada a la punción ya que se produce días después del evento. Objetivo: Revisar la información relacionada con la complicación de parálisis del VI par. Presentación del caso: Paciente de 33 años de edad, femenina, de profesión médico, con antecedentes personales de migraña, historia de anestesia neuroaxial epidural sin complicaciones, que para la realización de una cesárea de segmento arciforme y salpinguectomia parcial bilateral, recibió una anestesia combinada peridural-espinal. El transoperatorio transcurre con estabilidad hemodinámica, hizo cefalea al tercer día del posoperatorio, que la atribuyó al antecedente de migraña y fue tratada sin evaluación por anestesiología con dipirona. A los 10 días de operada hace desviación de la mirada y diplopia, se diagnostica parálisis del VI par. Fue tratada por Neurología y se plantean varios diagnósticos diferenciales. Los estudios imagenológicos resultan negativos, se trató con vitaminas y se produjo remisión a las 6 semanas. Conclusiones: El diagnóstico de esta complicación es necesario ya que puede pasar inadvertida la relación con la anestesia y, por tanto, ser mal conducido su tratamiento(AU)
Introduction: The approach to the subarachnoid space was described by Quincke in 1891. It is now a common practice to perform subarachnoid neuroaxial anesthesia in obstetric patients. The complications described, associated with this, are several. Within these, the paralysis of the abducens nerve or sixth pair is not frequent and sometimes is not related to the puncture, since it occurs days after the event. Objective: To review the information related to the complication of paralysis of the sixth pair. Case presentation: A 33-year-old female patient, a physician, with a personal history of migraine, a history of epidural neuroaxial anesthesia without complications, who underwent combined epidural-spinal anesthesia for performing a cranial segment cesarean section and bilateral partial salpingectomy. The transoperative period runs with hemodynamic stability. There was headache three days after surgery, which was attributed to the migraine history and the patient was treated, without evaluation by anesthesiology, with dipyrone. At 10 days after surgery, the eyes are diverted and diplopia is manifested, paralysis of the sixth pair is diagnosed. She was treated by neurology and several differential diagnoses were proposed. Imaging studies are negative. She was treated with vitamins and remission occurred at six weeks. Conclusions: The diagnosis of this complication is necessary, since the relationship with anesthesia may go unnoticed and, therefore, its treatment may be poorly conducted(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Adulto , Punção Espinal/efeitos adversos , Doenças do Nervo Abducente/complicações , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Diplopia/etiologiaRESUMO
To treat the patient who developed post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) after the epidural anesthesia for painless delivery or spinal subarachnoid anesthesia for caesarean section, we provided a combination therapy with Kampo medicines goshuyuto and ryokeijutsukanto (39 patients), and a single therapy with goshuyuto (17 patients). We compared the patients based on the improvement rate and the average of the differences of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) before and after taking Kampo medicines. Of 39 patients treated with combination therapy, 82.1% were effective in the improvement rate, and 74.4% were effective in NRS differences. Of 17 patients treated with goshuyuto alone, 58.8% was effective in the improvement rate, and 41.2% in NRS differences. In the improvement rate, it was insignificant (p=0.094). However, in the comparison of the average of the NRS differences, the combination therapy was significantly more effective than with from goshuyuto alone (p=0.032) (p<0.05). There was no significant difference depending on when the administration was started. It was suggested that a combination therapy with goshuyuto and ryokeijutsukanto is effective and convenient for PDPH.
RESUMO
Post-dural puncture headache is a complication of neuroaxial anesthesia. The initial approach consists of supportive treatment. In case of therapeutic failure, the epidural blood patch (PSE) is the treatment of choice. The case of a sphenopalatine ganglion block is presented for its management with good results.
La cefalea postpunción dural es una complicación de la anestesia neuroaxial. El abordaje inicial consiste en tratamiento de soporte. En caso de falla terapéutica, el parche sanguíneo epidural (PSE) es el tratamiento de elección. Se presenta el caso de un bloqueo de ganglio esfenopalatino para su manejo con buenos resultados.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural/terapia , Bloqueio do Gânglio Esfenopalatino/métodosRESUMO
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Post-dural puncture headache is a common complication in neuraxial anesthesia and lumbar puncture diagnostic procedures. The pathogenesis of the headache is thought to be due to a leak of cerebrospinal fluid from the puncture site that exceeds the rate of cerebrospinal fluid production, causing a downward traction of the meninges and vasodilation of the meningeal vessels mediated by the autonomous nervous system. Nowadays, the conservative treatment involves hydration, and the use of caffeine, analgesics, hydrocortisone, gabapentin, and theophylline. However, an autologous epidural blood patch is considered the definitive treatment for post-dural puncture headache and has an efficacy of up to 75%. Since this procedure comes with intrinsic risks, an alternative is the sphenopalatine ganglion block. CASE REPORT: We describe a case report using a sphenopalatine ganglion block to treat post-dural puncture headache in a patient submitted to cerebrospinal fluid pressure monitoring with a subarachnoidal catheter inserted with a low-gauge needle. CONCLUSION: This is the first case report of a post-dural puncture headache caused by a subarachnoid monitoring catheter successfully treated with sphenopalatine ganglion block. This technique can be a non-invasive option in the management of post-dural puncture headache, which requires more study to evaluate its efficacy and safety.
RESUMO
Background: The present study was conducted to compare three different Quincke’s spinal needles i.e. 23, 25 and 26 gauge in patients undergoing elective surgery under spinal anaesthesia (SA).Methods: The prospective randomized double-blind study was conducted on 150 male patients in the age group of 18-50 yrs., having physical status class I to II, scheduled for elective surgery under SA. Patients were randomly divided into three groups comprising 50 patients each. SA was administered using Quincke’s spinal needles of 23, 25 and 26 gauge in group 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Ease of insertion, number of attempts and time of appearance of CSF and incidence of PDPH was recorded in all the patients.Results: Ease of insertion was graded easy in 98%, 84% and 82% in group 1, 2 and 3 respectively. First attempt success rate was highest in group 1, (98%). Meantime for appearance of CSF beyond hub was maximum in group 3 i.e. 14.60±2.56 sec. Mild PDPH was reported in 6% and 2% patients after 24 hrs in group 1 and group 2 respectively.Conclusions: Finer spinal needle proved to be more dependable in generating less traumatic effect on the dura and preventing PDPH but are technically more difficult thus decreasing first attempt success rate.
RESUMO
Spinal Anaesthesia is widely practiced anaesthetic technique for sub - umbilical surgical procedures. However the technique is not without complications and Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) remains important amongst such complications. Aims and Objectives: The present study was prospective , was conducted to study the overall incidence of PDPH using 26 G Quincke type spinal needle and to establish its relations( if any) with the age of patient, type of surgery and time to ambulate following the surgery. Methods: A total of 500 patients of ASA I and II were studied. These patients underwent various orthopaedic, general surgical, obstetrical/ gynaecological surgical procedures under Spinal Anaesthesia using 26 G Quincke type spinal needle. All the patients were followed upto 72 hours post operatively for evaluation of PDPH. Results: The incidence of PDPH in the present study was 1.6%. The incidence was higher in female patients (75%). Among the female patients, 50% of patients were those who underwent Caesarean Section. Conclusion: The present study concludes free and widespread use of 26 G Quincke type needle in all patients who require Spinal Anaesthesia irrespective of type of surgery
RESUMO
Background: Spinal anesthesia for caesarean section isadvantageous due to simplicity of technique, rapidadministration and onset of anesthesia, reduced risk ofsystemic toxicity and increased density of spinal anestheticblock. The present study was conducted to assesscomplication of spinal anesthesia in cesarean section.Materials & Methods: The present study was conducted on104 cesarean sections performed in gynaecology department.Patient’s parameters such as heart rate, systolic bloodpressure, diastolic blood pressure and respiratory rates wereassessed regularly. Intraoperative complications wereassessed and recorded.Results: Age group 18- 22 years had 45 patients, 22-26 yearshad 30 and 26- 30 years had 25 patients. The difference wassignificant (P< 0.05). The most common complication wasshivering seen in 32, anesthetic failure in 27, Post-duralpuncture headache (PDPH) in 20, hypotension in 16,nausea/vomiting in 14, high spinal block in 12, backache in 5and loss of consciousness in 4. The difference was significant(P< 0.05).Conclusion: Authors found that complications of spinalanesthesia are not uncommon phenomenon. Commoncomplication was shivering, anesthetic failure, Post-duralpuncture headache (PDPH), hypotension, nausea/vomiting,high spinal block, backache and loss of consciousness.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND@#Conventional epidural anesthesia technique is a blind procedure, which relies solely on the palpation of the landmarks. Pregnancy makes epidural insertion more difficult because of the exaggeration of the lumbar iordosis, increase in subcutaneous fat, and difficulty in positioning due to the gravid uterus. These changes may make the conventional palpation technique less reliable in placing the epidural catheter during labor. Preprocedure ultrasound may be used as an adjunct in facilitating lumbar epidural insertion.@*OBJECTIVES@#The objective of the study was to determine the efficacy of preprocedure ultrasound in facilitating lumbar epidural insertion. This was achieved by determining the number of attempts, number of needle redirections, and incidence of adverse events with and without the use of ultrasound.@*METHODS@#The study was a randomized controlled trial. Forty two (42) subjects were enrolled in the study and were randomized into either the preprocedure ultrasound gorup or the conventional palpation technique group. Efficacy of the technique was measured according to the following variables: number of attempts, number of redirections, incidence of traumatic insertion and incidence of accidental dural puncture.@*RESULTS@#There was a significant difference in the number of attempts (p value of 0.03) and needle redirections (p value of 0.04) between the two (2) groups. There was no significant difference noted in the proportion of subjects with accidental dural puncture and traumatic insertion between the two (2) groups (p=1.00).@*CONCLUSION@#The number of attempts and needle redirections were significantly lower in those with ultrasound use compared to those without. No adverse events were noted on both groups.@*RECOMMENDATIONS@#Future studies may focus on the obese population utilizing larger samples wherein the landmarks needed for epidural placement are extremely difficult to identify. The lenght of time required to successfully insert the epidural with and without the use of preprocedure ultrasound can also be considered.
RESUMO
A 55-year-old man with an implantable intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) implant removal surgery was performed to control a suspected implant infection. Clear discharge from a lumbar wound was detected after IDDS removal, but transcutaneous cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) leakage was not suspected because the patient did not suffer from a postural headache. Finally, a suspected CSF leakage was resolved with a single epidural blood patch.