Eficacia del instrumento XP-endo Finisher y del sistema EndoActivator en la reducción/eliminación del biofilm bacteriano: un ensayo ex vivo / Ability of the XP-endo Finisher instrument and the EndoActivator system to reduce/eliminate of the bacterial biofilm: an ex vivo assay

Objetivos: Comparar ex vivo la eficacia del instrumento XP-endo Finisher y del sistema EndoActivator en la reducción/eliminación del biofilm microbiano en conductos radiculares infectados. Materiales y métodos: Se utilizaron 23 premolares inferiores humanos extraídos cuya longitud fue estandarizada en 17 mm. Todos los conductos se prepararon con el sistema WaveOne Gold Medium (#35.06). Los dientes se esterilizaron, se inocularon con Enterococcus faecalis y se separaron en dos grupos experimentales de 10 piezas cada uno. De los 3 dientes remanentes, 1 fue utilizado como control positivo y 2, como controles negativos. En el grupo 1, las soluciones irrigantes se agitaron con XP-endo Finisher. En el grupo 2, se utilizó EndoActivator. Se tomaron muestras antes de la contaminación, luego de esta y después de la agitación de los irrigantes mediante conos de papel estériles. La carga microbiana fue sembrada en agar sangre y los conos se cultivaron en caldo tripteína de soja. La remoción de la carga microbiana se determinó por la presencia o ausencia de turbiedad del medio. Las unidades formadoras de colonias (UFC) remanentes se cuantificaron y los resultados se categorizaron como R1 (≤10 UFC) o R2 (>10 UFC). Los datos fueron analizados mediante la prueba de Fisher. Resultados: No hubo diferencias significativas entre XP-endo Finisher y EndoActivator (P>0,05). El número de usos no influyó sobre la capacidad operativa de ambos instrumentos (AU)

Aim: To compare ex vivo the effectiveness of the XP-endo Finisher and the EndoActivator in biofilm reduction/ removal from infected root canals. Materials and methods: Twenty three extracted human single-rooted lower premolars were selected and standardised to 17 mm in length. All the canals were prepared with WaveOne Gold Medium reciprocating files (#35.06). The teeth were autoclaved and inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis. The infected teeth were then assigned to 2 experimental groups of 10 teeth each according to the final irrigation/agitation protocol. Of the three remaining teeth, one was used as a positive control, and the other two were used as negative controls. In Group 1 the irrigating solutions were agitated with XP-endo Finisher while in Group 2 the EndoActivator was used. All root canals were sampled before and after contamination, and again after irrigant agitation with sterile paper points. The microbial load was spread on blood agar plates and the paper points were cultured in sterile trypticase soy broth. The removal of the microbial load was determined by visual observation of the turbidity of the media and by quantification of the number of colony-forming units (UFC). The results were categorized as R1 (≤10 UFC) or R2 (>10 UFC). Data were analysed by the Fisher's exact test at P<0.05. Results: No significant differences was found between XP-endo Finisher and EndoActivator (P>0.05) regarding their effectiveness in the reduction/removal of the microbial biofilm. The number of uses of both instruments did not affect their operative performance (AU) Conclusion: XPF and EA were both equally effective for microbial biofilm reduction/removal from ex vivo infected root canals (AU)

Efficacy of diode laser and sonic agitation of Chlorhexidine and Silver-nanoparticles in infected root canals / Eficácia do laser de diodo e agitação sônica de clorexidina e nanopartículas de prata em canais radiculares infectados

Objective: To assess the efficacy of agitation of chlorohexidine (CHX) and Silver nanoparticles "AgNps" with 810nm diode laser or sonic endoactivator compared to side ­vented needle on infected root canals with Enterococcus "E" Faecalis biofilms. Material and Methods: Sixty-five extracted human premolars with single oval canals were instrumented by protaper system up to F3. Biofilms of E. faecalis were generated based on a previously established protocol. Two teeth were used to check the biofilm formation, then the remaining Teeth were randomly divided into three equal experimental groups according to agitation techniques used: group 1 (810 nm diode laser with 1 watt) , group 2 (sonic endoactivator) and group 3 (Side vented needle). Each group was further divided into three equal subgroups according to the irrigant solution into; subgroup A: chlorohexidine, subgroup B: silver nanoparticles and subgroup C: distilled water: Confocal laser scanning microscopy "CLSM" was used to assess bacterial viability. Data were analyzed by appropriate statistical analyses with P = 0.05. Results: Regarding the activation method, all groups had a significantly high percentage of dead bacteria (P < 0.05). However, Laser was significantly the highest and Endoactivator the least (P < = 0.001). Diode laser agitation of AgNps irrigant showed the highest reduction percentage of bacteria (78.1%) with a significant difference with both CHX and water irrigation, Conclusion: Under the condition of the present study; results reinforced that laser activation is a useful adjunct, 810 nm diode laser agitation of AgNps or chlorhexidine was more effective in disinfection of oval root canals than endoactivator and side vented needle techniques. (AU)

Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia da agitação de clorohexidina (CHX) e nanopartículas de prata (AgNps) , com laser de diodo de 810 nm ou endoativador sônico, em comparação à agulha de ventilação lateral, em canais radiculares infectados com biofilmes de Enterococcus "E"; Faecalis. Material e Métodos: Sessenta e cinco pré-molares humanos com um único canal oval, extraídos, foram instrumentados pelo sistema protaper até F3. Os biofilmes de E. faecalis foram gerados com base em um protocolo previamente estabelecido. Foram utilizados dois dentes para verificar a formação do biofilme, e os dentes restantes foram divididos aleatoriamente em três grupos experimentais iguais, de acordo com as técnicas de agitação utilizadas: grupo 1 (laser de diodo 810 nm com 1 watt), grupo 2 (endoativador sônico) e grupo 3 (Agulha com ventilação lateral). Cada grupo foi dividido em três subgrupos iguais, de acordo com a solução irrigante; subgrupo A: clorohexidina, subgrupo B: nanopartículas de prata e subgrupo C: água destilada: A microscopia confocal de varredura a laser foi usada para avaliar a viabilidade bacteriana. Os dados foram analisados por análises estatísticas apropriadas com P = 0,05. Resultados: Em relação ao método de ativação, todos osgrupos apresentaram percentual significativamente alto de bactérias mortas (P < 0.05). No entanto, para o laser foi significativamente o mais alto e, para oendoativador, o menos alto (P < = 0.001). A agitação com laser de diodo doirrigante AgNps apresentou a maior porcentagem de redução de bactérias (78,1%), com diferença significativa tanto para irrigação com CHX quanto comágua. Conclusão: Sob as condições do presente estudo; os resultadosreforçaram que a ativação a laser é um complemento útil, a agitação por laserde diodo de 810 nm de AgNps ou clorexidina foi mais eficaz na desinfecção dos canais radiculares ovais do que as técnicas de endoativador e agulha com ventilação lateral. (AU)

Antibacterial efficacy of sodium hypochlorite with a novel sonic agitation device.

Objective : The aim of this study is to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) with sonic agitation devices. Materials and Methods: Fifty extracted human single-rooted teeth were collected. Canals were prepared up to Profile #35/0.06. Forty teeth were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis and incubated for 24 hours. The teeth were then divided into five groups based on the agitation device used. Group 1- was agitated with EndoActivator . Group 2 was agitated with Waterpik Power Flosser. In Group 3, Waterpik flosser was used with a nickel-titanium file. Group 4 (positive control) was not subjected to any agitation, and Group 5 -was the negative control. Superficial and deep dentinal shavings were collected from coronal and apical halves and sowed in brain heart infusion (BHI) agar to evaluate colony-forming units (CFU/mL). Results: Krusal Wallis, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Mann-Whitney U test showed that Group 3 showed a smaller number of CFUs/mL Group 2 showed a relatively greater number of CFU/mL. The deep apical dentin areas showed more number of CFUs relative to other sites. Conclusion: The nickel-titanium file attached to the Waterpik Power Flosser system was found to be as effective as the EndoActivator in antibacterial efficacy against E.faecalis.

Evaluation of Enterococcus faecalis removal efficacy of the EndoVac(R) and EndoActivator(R) intracanal irrigation methods / 대한치과보존학회지

The aim of this study was to evaluate endodontic irrigation methods with EndoVac(R) and EndoActivator(R) in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canals. Extracted 70 human single-rooted teeth were used. The canals were instrumented by a crown-down technique with .04 taper ProFile to ISO size 40. After the teeth were autoclaved, the canals were inoculated with E. faecalis and incubated for 48 h. The teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups of 20 teeth each according to canal irrigation methods and two control groups as follows: group 1 - EndoVac(R) group 2 - EndoActivator(R) ; group 3 - Conventional needle irrigation method. After canal irrigation using 2.5% NaOCl, first samples (S1) were taken using sterile paper point. And the canals were filled with sterile brain heart infusion (BHI) broth and incubated for 24 h, then second samples (S2) were taken. The samples were cultured on BHI agar plate to determine the numbers of colony forming units (CFU). In first sampling (S1), only one canal of conventional method among the all experimental groups was positive cultured. In second sampling (S2), EndoVac(R) group showed the least positive culture numbers of E. faecalis. There was statistically significant difference between the EndoVac(R) and conventional needle irrigation methods in the mean value of Log CFU. According to the results of this study, EndoVac(R) showed better efficacy than conventional needle irrigation method in the elimination of E. faecalis from the root canal.

A Comparison of the irrigation systems in calcium hydroxide removal / 대한치과보존학회지

The purposes of this study were to compare the efficacy of irrigation systems by removing a calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) paste from the apical third of the root canal and the effect of the patency file. Sixty single rooted human teeth were used in this study. The canals were instrumented by a crown-down manner with .04 taper ProFile to ISO #35. Ca(OH)2 and distilled water were mixed and placed inside the root canals. The teeth were divided into 6 groups according to the root canal irrigation system and the use of patency file as follows: group 1 - conventional method; group 2 - EndoActivator(R); group 3 - EndoVac(R); group 4 - conventional method, patency; group 4 - EndoActivator(R), patency; group 6 - EndoVac(R), patency. All teeth were irrigated with sodium hypochlorite. After the root canal irrigation, the teeth were split in bucco-lingual aspect. Percentage of the root canal surface coverage with residual Ca(OH)2 until 3 mm from working length was analyzed using Image Pro Plus ver. 4.0. Statistical analysis was performed using the One-way ANOVA, t-test and Scheffe's post-hoc test. Conventional groups had significantly more Ca(OH)2 debris than EndoActivator(R), EndoVac(R) groups. There was no significant difference between EndoActivator(R) and EndoVac(R) groups. Groups with patency file showed more effective in removing Ca(OH)2 paste than no patency groups, but, it was no significant difference. This study showed that EndoActivator(R) and EndoVac(R) systems were more effective in removing Ca(OH)2 paste from the apical third of the root canal than conventional method.