RESUMO
Objective To identify the reasons and treatment strategies of epidural fluid collection (EFC) secondary to cranioplasty in patients with traumatic brain injury after decompressive craniectomy.Methods From June 2013 to July 2017,a retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data of 150 patients with traumatic brain injury after decompressive craniectomy in our hospital.A total of 47 patients experienced EFC following cranioplasty and 103 not.Risk factors of EFC after cranioplasty were analyzed by multiple factor Logistic regression.Results For the 47 EFC patients,32 patients had no obvious clinical symptoms and EFC was absorbed gradually through conservative therapy;15 patients had clinical symptoms,such as mental deterioration,headache,or limb weakness.EFC disappeared through vacuation in 4 patients and subcutaneous drainage in 11.The proportions of patients with skull defect>80 cm2,dural defect and dural calcification in patients with EFC were significantly higher as compared with those without EFC (P<0.05).Multiple factor Logistic regression analysis showed that skull defect>80 cm2 and dural mater calcification were independent risk factors for EFC after cranioplasty.Conclusions Patients with large skull defect>80 cm2 and dural calcification are prone to have EFC after cranioplasty.Careful evaluation of imaging data,good surgical skills and strengthening postoperative management can reduce incidence of EFC after cranioplasty.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The epidural fluid collection (EFC) as a complication of cranioplasty is not well-described in the literature. This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for the development of EFC as a complication of cranioplasty, and its outcomes. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2012, 117 cranioplasty were performed in our institution. One-hundred-and-six of these patients were classified as either having EFC, or not having EFC. The two groups were compared to identify risk factors for EFC. Statistical significance was tested using the t-test and chi-square test, and a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 117 patients undergoing cranioplasty, 59 (50.4%) suffered complications, and EFC occurred in 48 of the patients (41.0%). In the t-test and chi-test, risk factors for EFC were size of the skull defect (p=0.003) and postoperative air bubbles in the epidural space (p<0.001). In a logistic regression, the only statistically significant factor associated with development of EFC was the presence of postoperative air bubbles. The EFC disappeared or regressed over time in 30 of the 48 patients (62.5%), as shown by follow-up brain computed tomographic scan, but 17 patients (35.4%) required reoperation. CONCLUSION: EFC after cranioplasty is predicted by postoperative air bubbles in the epidural space. Most EFC can be treated conservatively. However, reoperation is necessary to resolve about a third of the cases. During cranioplasty, special attention is required when the skull defect is large, since EFC is then more likely.
Assuntos
Humanos , Encéfalo , Espaço Epidural , Seguimentos , Modelos Logísticos , Reoperação , Fatores de Risco , CrânioRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Infection and bone resorption are major complications of cranioplasty and have been well recognized. However, there are few clinical series describing the epidural fluid collection (EFC) as complication of cranioplasty. This study was planned to identify the predictive factors and fate of EFC after cranioplasty. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the demographic, clinical, and radiographic data in 59 patients who underwent a first cranioplsty following decompressive craniectomy during a period of 6 years, from January 2004 to December 2009. We compared demographic, clinical, and radiographic factors between EFC group and no EFC group. The predictive factors associated with the development of EFC were assessed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 22 of 59 patients (37.3%) suffered from EFC following cranioplasty. EFC had disappeared (n=6, 31.8%) or regressed (n=6, 31.8%) over time on follow up brain computed tomographic (CT) scans. However, 5 patients (22.7%) required reoperation due to symptomatic and persistent EFC. Predictive factors for EFC were male [odds ratio (OR), 5.48; 95% CI, 1.26-23.79], air bubbles in the epidural space (OR, 12.52; 95% CI, 2.26-69.28), and dural calcification on postoperative brain CT scan (OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.12-15.84). CONCLUSION: The most of EFCs could be treated by conservative therapy. Air bubble in the epidural space and dural calcification are proposed to be the predictive factors in the formation of EFC after cranioplasty.