The Results of Eversion Endarterectomy for Carotid Artery Stenosis / 대한혈관외과학회지

PURPOSE: Potential benefits of eversion carotid endarterectomy (eCEA) compared with conventional carotid enderterectomy (cCEA) are more simple and faster reanastomosis with a low risk of restenosis. However, in Korea, eCEA is not popular having only one report of eCEA. This study aimed to investigate the results of eCEA. METHODS: From July 2008 to September 2010, authors performed 36 eCEAs for patients with carotid artery stenosis in our hospital. Patients' demographics and clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. Regarding early (<30 days) results including the frequency of postoperative stroke, myocardial infarction, cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome, bleeding, cranial nerve palsy, new brain lesions (NBLs) on diffuse-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) and mortality were examined. Mid-term results such as stroke, death and restenosis after over thirty days were also examined. RESULTS: Mean age was 66.6 years old and 88.9% of the patients were male. Twenty-four patients (66.7%) had a previous neurological event in the preceding 6 months. A carotid shunt was used in 3 cases (8.3%) and mean carotid clamping time was 25.4 minutes. One case (2.8%) of non-disabling ipsilateral stroke, 1 case (2.8%) of wound hematoma and 1 case (2.8%) of cranial nerve palsy developed after operation. DW-MRI was conducted in 27 patients (75.0%) and NBLs were detected in 4 patients (11.1%). One case (2.8%) of restenosis was discovered during the follow-up period (mean, 9.0 months), and there were no strokes or death. CONCLUSION: Early and mid-term postoperative stroke and complication rates of eCEA were acceptable in our series. However, to assess efficacy of eCEA, further large-volumed and long-term follow-up studies are needed.

Scleral Eversion Technique for Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implant after Evisceration

PURPOSE: This study is to describe scleral eversion technique as a modification of evisceration to improve its disadvantages for placement of porous orbital implant and to report the results of placement of porous orbital implants with this technique. METHODS: The medical records of 27 patients with 27 eyes who had undergone evisceration and placement of porous polyethylene orbital implant with scleral eversion technique between November 1998 and January 2000 were reviewed. Surgical technique involved the removal of corneal button and the intraocular contents. Optic nerve was severed, scleral shell was everted, and porous polyethylene orbital implant was implanted into the retroscleral and intraconal space. RESULTS: Orbital implants of 20 mm in diameter were implanted in all patients. The average postoperative follow-up interval was 22.4 months. No patient experienced severe complications like exposure of implant. All of patients showed good motility of orbital implant and 19 patients were satisfied with motility of prosthesis. Eight patients (29.6%) got placement of motility coupling post without significant problems to enhance motility. CONCLUSIONS: Scleral eversion technique is safe and useful for evisceration and placement of porous polyethylene orbital implant. This technique can provide adequate space for adequate size of implant without any tension on wound, thick anterior scleral barrier for implant and more vascular source for fibrovascular ingrowth. Therefore, it decrease exposure rate of implant.