Autologous nasal septal cartilage combined with expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene in the secondary nasal deformity correction surgery of postoperative cleft lip / 中华医学美学美容杂志

Objective To correct the nasal deformities of cleft lip by expanded-polytetrafluoroe thylene (e-PTFE) combined with autologous nasal septal cartilage.Methods e-PTFE was placed nearby verge of anterior nasal aperture to raise the fundament of nose.Autologous nasal septal cartilage was harvested and combined with e-PTFE to form a sandwich structure.Nasal tip and collapsed nasaI alar were repaired by this method.Results Fifty cases were treated by this method and 42 cases were followed up for about one year.The results were satisfying.The contour of the nose was similar to normal.Only 3 cases were relapsed after one year.Conclusions e-PTFE combined with autologous nasal septal cartilage is an ideal method to correct nasal deformities of cleft lip.

Guided bone regeneration using two types of non-resorbable barrier membranes

INTRODUCTION: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a common procedure for the treatment of bone defects and bone augmentation. The non-resorbable barriers are well-documented barriers for GBR because of their stability and malleability. However, few GBR studies have focused on the different types of non-resorbable barriers. Therefore, this study examined the clinical results of different non-resorbable barriers for GBR; expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) (TR-Gore Tex, Flagstaff, AZ, USA), and high-density polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) (Cytoplast membrane, Oraltronics, Bremen, Germany). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis was performed on patients treated with GBR and implant placement from January 2007 to October 2007 in the department of the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups based on the type of non-resorbable barrier used, and the amount of bone regeneration, marginal bone resorption after prosthetics, implant survival rate and surgical complication in both groups were evaluated. RESULTS: The implants in both groups showed high survival rates, and the implant-supported prostheses functioned stably during the follow-up period. During the second surgery of the implant, all horizontal defects were filled with new bone, and there was no significant difference in the amount of vertical bone defect. CONCLUSION: In bone defect areas, GBR with non-resorbable barriers can produce favorable results with adequate postoperative management. There was no significant difference in bone regeneration between e-PTFE and d-PTFE.

Polytetrafluoroethylene as a Spacer Graft for the Correction of Lower Eyelid Retraction

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of porous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE, Goretex (R) ) containing large pores made with a 21-gauge needle as a graft for the correction of lower lid retraction. METHODS: e-PTFE grafts were implanted between the tarsus and lower lid retractor via a transconjunctival approach with/without amniotic membrane transplantation, or via a transcutaneous approach. Rabbits were examined and assessed for corneal and conjunctival complications and for e-PTFE graft status. Rabbits were sacrificed for a histological study at 8 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: e-PTFE grafts were uniformly extruded 3 weeks postoperatively in eyelids operated on via the transconjunctival approach. However, rabbits operated on via the transcutaneous approach demonstrated e-PTFE graft retention; in addition, dense fibrovascular ingrowths into the large pores of e-PTFE were observed histologically. CONCLUSIONS: e-PTFE is a good substitute for other graft materials as a spacer in lower lid retraction operations, especially as an interpositional graft using a transcutaneous approach.