Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy ; (12): 3090-3093, 2017.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-614694

RESUMO

Objective To compare the clinical effect of surgery with longitudinal incision and transverse suture in the treatment of anal fissure excision of anal fissure.Methods 60 patients with anal fissure who required surgery were selected,and they were randomly divided into two groups according to the digital table.30 patients in the control group received anal fissure resection,30 cases in the observation group received anal fissure longitudinal incision and transverse suture treatment.The clinical curative effect was compared between the two groups.Results The effective rate of the control group was 93.33%,which of the observation group was 96.67%,there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).The postoperative pain score of the control group was (3.89 ±1.30) points,which of the observation group was (1.33 ± 1.20) points,there was significant difference between the two groups(t =8.449,P< 0.05).The incidence rate of complication of the control group was 6.67%,which of the observation group was 23.33%,there was significant difference between the two groups (x2 =9.524,P < 0.05).Conclusion The surgical treatment of anal fissure,surgery and excision of anal fissure anal fissure joints have advantages and disadvantages according to the treatment of transverse slitting,the specific patient should select the specific surgical methods.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA