RESUMO
Objective:To investigate the effect of apatinib and fluzoparib on the proliferation ability of cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer cells.Methods:Human ovarian cancer cells SKOV3 and cisplatin-resistant SKOV3/DDP cells of human ovarian cancer were treated with different concentrations of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64,128 μg/ml cisplatin at different times; CCK-8 method was used to detect the proliferation rate and half-inhibitory concentration ( IC50) of SKOV3 and SKOV3/DDP cells, and the drug-resistance fold of SKOV3/DDP cell was also calculated. SKOV3/DDP cells were treated with different concentrations of apatinib (4, 8, 16, 32, 64 μmol/L) and fluzoparib (148.15, 222.22, 333.33, 500.00, 750.00 μmol/L) for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, respectively; the cell proliferation rate was determined by using CCK-8 method and IC50 was calculated. SKOV3/DDP cells were divided into the blank control group (cells untreated with drugs), cisplatin group, cisplatin + apatinib group, cisplatin + fluzoparib group, cisplatin + fluzoparib + apatinib group, and drug intervention was given in each group; the inhibition rate of cells in each group was detected by using CCK8 method. Results:The proliferation rate of SKOV3 cells treated with the same concentration of cisplatin for the same time was lower than that of SKOV3/DDP cells, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The IC50 of SKOV3/DDP cells treated with 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 μmol/L apatinib was 742.1μmol/L at 24 h, 156.8 μmol/L at 48 h, and 77.5 μmol/L at 72 h. Compared with the control group, the proliferation rate of SKOV3/DDP cells treated with apatinib at an effective concentration greater than 32 μmol/L was significantly decreased, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The IC50 of SKOV3/DDP cells treated with 148.15, 222.22, 333.33, 500.00, 750.00 μmol/L fluzoparib was 878.5 μmol/L at 24 h, 406.7 μmol/L at 48 h, and 283.3μmol/L at 72 h. When the effective concentration of fluzoparib was more than 333.33 μmol/L for 24 h, the proliferation rate of SKOV3/DDP cells was lower than that of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the proliferation rate of SKOV3/DDP cells was decreased when the effective concentration was more than 148.15 μmol/L at 48 h and 72 h, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The cell proliferation rate of 5 μg/ml cisplatin + 64 μmol/L apatinib group was lower than that of 5 μg/ml cisplatin group [(40.4±1.4)% vs. (62.7±1.4)%, t = 20.22, P < 0.001]. The cell proliferation rate of 5 μg/ml cisplatin + 290 μmol/L fluzoparib group was lower than that of 5 μg/ml cisplatin group [(5.2±0.4)% vs. (62.7±1.4)%, t = 52.04, P < 0.001]. The cell proliferation rate of 5 μg/ml cisplatin + 64 μmol/L apatinib + 290 μmol/L fluzoparib group was lower than that of 5 μg/ml cisplatin group [(0.3±0.8)% vs. (62.7±1.4)%, t = 53.98, P < 0.001]. The 5 μg/ml cisplatin + 64 μmol/L apatinib + 290 μmol/L fluzoparib group had the lowest proliferation rate of SKOV3/DDP cells, which was lower than that of 5μg/ml cisplatin + 64 μmol/L apatinib group and 5 μg/ml cisplatin + 290 μmol/L fluzoparib group (all P < 0.001). Conclusions:Apatinib and fluzoparib can enhance the sensitivity of human ovarian cancer cisplatin-resistant cells SKOV3/DDP to cisplatin, and the combination of drugs can produce the stronger inhibitory effects and reverse cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer.
RESUMO
Objective:To investigate the effects of poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase-1(PARP-1) inhibitor fluzoparib on proliferation, apoptosis and migration of pancreatic cancer PANC1 cells.Methods:PANC1 cells cultured in conventional culture medium were used as control group, and PANC1 cells cultured in the medium containing fluzoparib were used as fluzoparib group. The effects of fluzoparib with different concentrations on the proliferation of PANC1 cells were detected by CCK8 method, and the half inhibitory concentration (IC 50) of fluzoparib on PANC1 cells was calculated. The effect of fluzoparib on apoptosis and cell cycle of PANC1 cells was detected by flow cytometry, and the migration ability of PANC1 cells was detected by cell scratch test and Transwell chamber. Results:Compared with control group, with the increase of fluzoparib concentration and the prolongation of the action time, the cell proliferation activity of PANC1 in fluzoparib group was significantly decreased, and the differences were statistically significant (all P values <0.05). IC 50 of fluzoparib on PANC1 cells cultured for 24 h was 0.03 mmol/L. After 24 h culture, the IC 50 apoptosis rate of fluzoparib group was (32.19±2.48)%, and the apoptosis rate of control group was (21.99±6.30)%. The former was greatly higher than the latter, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The proportion of cells in G 2/M phase was (16.28±0.62)% in the fluzoparib group and (11.64±0.88)% in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The migration rates of PANC1 cells in IC 50 fluzoparib group in 12 h and 24 h culture were (2.59±1.46)% and (19.76±7.84)%; and those in control group were (27.08±2.17)% and (45.92±3.61)%, respectively. The number of transmembrane cells was (348±19) cells/10 visual field in the fluzoparib group and (587±14) cells/10 visual field in the control group. The migration ability of PANC1 cells in fluzoparib group was significantly lower than that in control group ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Fluzoparib can inhibit the proliferation and migration of PANC1 cells and promote the apoptosis of PANC1 in vitro, which may be an effective drug for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.