Fundamentos teórico-técnicos para la comprensión y detección de la simulación de déficits neurocognitivos / Theoretical-technical foundations for the understanding and detection of the simulation of neurocognitive deficits

La neuropsicología está desarrollándose y migrando a otras áreas tales como la judicial, en donde el neuropsicólogo forense ayuda al juez a tomar decisiones ecuánimes e imparciales, sin embargo, nace como problemática el fenómeno de la simulación de déficits neurocognitivos con el propósito de obtener ganancias secundarias. Este artículo tiene como objetivo abordar dicho fenómeno mediante una sistematización bibliográfica, estableciendo un marco teórico-comprensivo del fenómeno, así como también identificando las principales herramientas para su detección. Se esquematizan apartados que forman un hilo conductor que arrojan como resultado que la detección de la simulación de déficits neurocognitivos es una tarea compleja, multidimensional y que debería tener un enfoque holístico, por lo tanto, es necesario seguir investigando al respecto para perfeccionar sus métodos de identificación.

Neuropsychology is developing and migrating to other areas such as the judicial, where the forensic neuropsychologist helps the judge to make fair and impartial decisions, however, the phenomenon of the simulation of neurocognitive deficits with the purpose of obtaining secondary gains is born as a problem. This article aims to address this phenomenon through a bibliographic systematization, establishing a theoretical-comprehensive framework of the phenomenon, as well as identifying the main tools for its detection. Thus, sections are outlined that form a common thread that show as a result that the detection of the simulation of neurocognitive deficits is a complex, multidimensional task and that it should have a holistic approach, therefore, it is necessary to continue researching in this regard. to perfect its results identification methods.

Forensic neuropsychological assessment: a review of its scope

Issues related to the field of mental health and justice require a multifactorial understanding of the possible causes of such issues. Objective To conduct an integrative literature review of controlled studies describing forensic neuropsychological assessment. Methods The articles were compiled and analyzed in two phases: 1) first, we retrieved all papers in PubMed by the keywords “Forensic Neuropsychology” and generated a growth curve for the subject and a cluster-based thematic distribution of publications. 2) We then conducted a curated analysis of all relevant papers indexed in Medline, PubMed and ISI, between 2000 and 2012. Results The evolution of the field during the last 15 years reveals an unstable growth pattern and three main thematic clusters. In terms of our curated analysis, a total of 390 articles were pre-selected, resulting in the selection of 44 fully-relevant studies, which comprise four main categories: cognitive damage in forensic psychiatric patients; imitation of cognitive damage; civil capacity, penal liability and violence risk; and validation of neuropsychological assessment tools. Discussion Two aspects appeared as the most relevant in this study: growth in the use of neuropsychological assessment as a diagnostic tool in the forensic context; and the necessity to enhance conformity in assessments...

Revisión de dos instrumentos de simulación neurocognitiva y su utilidad en el contexto forense / Review of the neurocognitive malingering instrument and its useful in a forensic contex

Gran parte de la precisión de la evaluación neuropsicológica, depende que los instrumentos que utiliza, sean medidas estandarizadas, válidas y confiables. Sin embargo, la simulación, la exageración y el bajo esfuerzo son aspectos que pueden interferir en los resultados de los test. El objetivo de esta revisión pretende describir y analizar dos instrumentos en el contexto de la Neuropsicología Forense que evalúan simulación de síntomas cognitivos: el Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) y el Victoria Symptoms Validity Test (VSVT). Se realizó una búsqueda dirigida no exhaustiva, en diversas bases de datos y libros afines. El criterio de inclusión fue la utilización o revisión de los test. Se seleccionaron 68 trabajos publicados. Cada uno de los cuales fue analizado en base a las características técnicas de los instrumentos. La revisión ha demostrado que el TOMM y el VSVT son instrumentos pertinentes para valorar simulación y exageración de sintomatología cognitiva. Estos instrumentos cuentan con un cúmulo de investigaciones que avalan sus propiedades, pero también las limitaciones y restricciones de su utilización.

Most of the accuracy in neuropsychological assessment depends that the instruments used are standardized, valid and reliable measures. However, malingering, exaggeration and poor effort are aspects that can interfere with the interpretation of the results. The aim of this review was to describe and analyze two instruments in the context of forensic neuropsychology that assess malingering of cognitive symptoms: Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and Victoria Symptoms ValidityTest (VSVT). Several scientific databases and related books were searched non-exhaustively. The criterion for inclusion in this review was the use of test. We selected 68 documents, each one was analyzed based on the technical characteristics of the instruments. Review showed that the TOMM and VSVT are relevant instruments for assessing malingering and exaggeration of cognitive symptoms. These instruments have several evidence that support their psychometric properties but also limitations and restrictions on their use.

Detecção de simulação com o uso do wisconsin card sorting test e do trail making test / Detection of malingering using the wisconsin card sorting test and the trail making test

Neste trabalho, tentamos identificar índices de simulação na avaliação neuropsicológica forense, através da avaliação dos padrões de resposta em provas neuropsicológicas. A amostra foi constituída por 56 sujeitos com traumatismo crânioencefálico. Todos se encontravam numa situação de possível recompensa monetária por incapacidade. Utilizamos os instrumentos Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Trail Making Test (TMT), Inventário de Sintomas Psicopatológicos (BSI), e a grelha de análise dos autos do processo. Cerca de 30% da amostra enquadrou-se no grupo de prováveis simuladores. Essa porcentagem é congruente com a literatura. Verificou-se uma grande homogeneidade entre os indivíduos com e sem indicadores de simulação, a nível sintomatológico e características sócio-demográficas, o que reforça a necessidade de desenvolvimento de métodos eficazes na detecção da simulação.

The objective of this study was to identify indicators of malingering in forensic neuropsychological assessment by identifying response patterns in neuropsychological tests. The sample was composed by 56 subjects diagnosed with a cranioencephalic trauma. All subjects were in a situation of monetary reward if incapacity was proven. The instruments used were the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and a legal process data file. Approximately 30% of the studied sample was identified as probable malingerers. This percentage is consistent with the literature. We identified a high level of homogeneity of psychological symptoms and socio-demographic features in the group of subjects with indicators of malingering and in the group without such indicators. These results reinforce the necessity to develop efficient methods to detect malingering.