RESUMO
To investigate the effect of long-term indwelling gastric tube on the prevention and treatment of esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal circumferential superficial cancer, data of patients with esophageal circumferential superficial cancer who underwent ESD in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 15 patients with gastric tube placement (GTP) after ESD (the GTP group ), and 23 patients without GTP (the non-GTP group). The general information, lesion location, pathological stage, postoperative complications, degree of esophageal stenosis (water intake), pain conditions, number of hospitalizations and medical expenses were compared between the two groups. The results showed that there was no significant difference in age, gender, lesion location or postoperative pathological stage between the two groups ( P>0.05). Compared with the non-GTP group, the rate of water intake in the GTP group was significantly higher (11/15 VS 6/23, P<0.05), the frequency of pain was less in the GTP group (7.3±3.1 times VS 10.7±3.6 times, t=3.00, P<0.05), and the number of hospitalizations and the medical expenses after ESD to before and after stent placement were significantly lower in the GTP group than those in the non-GTP group ( P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of delayed bleeding and perforation, or time of the first stenosis after ESD between the two groups ( P>0.05). The results of the study initially showed that long-term indwelling gastric tube after ESD can reduce the degree of esophageal stenosis with good safety for esophageal circumferential superficial lesions.
RESUMO
Objective To compare the difference between GUSS swallowing evaluation and traditional evaluation as a symbol of pulling out stomach tube.Methods 60 patients with cerebral hemorrhage combined with indwelling tube were divided into two groups,the GUSS group and the traditional group,according to the symbol of pulling out the gastric tube.Each group contained 30 cases.The GUSS score ≥ 15 points was used as the symbol of pulling out the gastric tube in the GUSS group,while being able to eat 200 ml liquid without any trouble in two days was used as the symbol in the traditional group.Then we compared the incidence of gastric tube reinsertion and aspiration pneumonitis between the two groups.Results No gastric tube reinsertion and aspiration pneumonitis occurred in the GUSS group,while 7 cases accepted gastric tube reinsertion and 3 cases diagnosed as aspiration pneumonitis in the traditional group.The incidence of gastric tube reinsertion and aspiration pneumonitis in the GUSS group were obviously lower than those in the traditional group.Conclusions GUSS evaluation score ≥ 15 points could be used as a symbol of pulling out gastric tube.
RESUMO
Objective To explore the practicability and clinical significance of gastric tube insertion by left recumbent position for patients with exanimation. Methods We divided 100 patients with exanimation who needed gastric tube insertion into the routien group and the left-recumbent-position group with 50 cases in each group randomly and adopted routine insertion method and insertion by left recumbent position.The success rate of tube insertion and incidence of complications were observed in the two groups.Results The one-time success rate of insertion was higher while the incidence of complication was lower in the left-recumbent-position group compared with the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Gastric tube insertion by left recumbent position proved to be a desirable method in that it could increase the onetime success rate of insertion and decrease the complications.So it worth widely applying.