RESUMO
Background: Frozen Sections (FS) are used to assess margins, for staging, and primary diagnosis. FS guide intraoperative treatment decisions in oncological gastro-intestinal tract surgeries and further management of the patients. Aim: To analyze the distribution, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of frozen sections in gastrointestinal pathology in our institution during the period of 3 years (2016–2018). Material and Methods: This study was an audit to determine the accuracy of FS reports by comparing them with the paraffin section (PS) reports. The FS diagnoses and their PS diagnoses were noted in 1704 gastrointestinal surgeries during the period from 2016 to 2018. Discrepancies were noted and slides of discrepant cases were reviewed to determine the cause. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated using the standard formulae. Results: Out of 1704 cases, correct diagnosis on frozen section was made in 1649 cases (96.77%), 20 (1.17%) were deferred cases, and 35 (2.05%) were discrepant cases. The commonest discrepancies were seen in the primary diagnosis of the gall bladder and gastrectomy margins. The commonest causes for discrepancies were interpretation errors and technical errors. Sensitivity was 91.71%, specificity was 99.69%, positive predictive value was 98.84%, negative predictive value was 97.68%, and accuracy was 97.92%. Conclusion: FS diagnosis is a reliable guide to surgeons for intraoperative management. Studying deep cuts and careful sampling at frozen sections will help reduce discrepancies.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Ileitis is defined as an inflammation of the ileum, which is evaluated during colonoscopy. Biopsies should be performed on altered ileus, aiding to the diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the correlation of anatomopathological findings on ileitis between pathologists and endoscopists. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional study, between 2013 and 2017. Examination report, indications for colonoscopy, and medical records were evaluated to identify whether the colonoscopic findings were clinically significant. Anatomopathological samples were reviewed by a pathologist expert in gastrointestinal tract. Patients over 18 years of age who had undergone ileoscopy were included, whereas patients below 18 years of age and those with previous intestinal resections were excluded. The correlation was assessed using the kappa coefficient index. RESULTS: A total of 5833 colonoscopies were conducted in the study period and 3880 cases were included. Ileal alterations were observed in 206 cases, with 2.94% being clinically significant. A hundred and sixty three biopsies were evaluated using the kappa index, resulting in agreement among pathologists of 0.067 and among pathologist and endoscopist of 0.141. CONCLUSION: It was observed that despite the low concordance between pathologists and endoscopists, there was no change in patient outcomes. This study confirms the importance of knowledge of the main anatomopathological changes related to ileitis by pathologists and endoscopists, making the best diagnosis and follow-up.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: Ileíte é definida como uma inflamação ileal, que pode ser avaliada durante a colonoscopia. Biópsias devem ser realizadas em íleos alterados, acrescentando na definição diagnóstica. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a correlação de achados anatomopatológicos das ileítes entre patologistas e endoscopistas. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo, transversal, entre os anos de 2013 e 2017. Foram avaliados laudos de exames, indicações e prontuários para identificar quando os achados colonoscópicos foram significativos. As amostras de anatomopatologia foram revisadas por um patologista especialista em trato gastrointestinal. Foram incluídos pacientes acima de 18 anos, com ileoscopia, e excluídos pacientes menores de 18 anos e os com ressecções intestinais prévias. A correlação foi avaliada utilizando-se o coeficiente kappa. RESULTADOS: Durante o período do estudo foram realizadas 5833 colonoscopias, das quais 3880 foram incluídas. Alterações ileais foram observadas em 206 casos, com 2,94% sendo clinicamente significativo. Cento e sessenta e três biópsias foram avaliadas, resultando em coeficiente kappa entre patologistas de 0,067 e entre patologista e endoscopista de 0,141. CONCLUSÃO: Foi observado que a despeito da baixa concordância entre patologistas e endoscopistas, não houve mudança no desfecho clínico do paciente. Esse estudo confirma a importância do conhecimento dos achados anatomopatológicos principais das ileítes entre patologistas e endoscopias, fazendo o melhor diagnóstico e seguimento.