Application of two methods of high-risk HPV detection in early screening of uterine cervical cancer / 中国肿瘤临床

Objective:This study aims to select the more suitable testing method for early screening of uterine cervical cancer to protect susceptible populations. Application value was compared between the two methods of high-risk HPV detection in early screening of uterine cervical cancer. Methods:The two methods, namely, fluorescence quantitation polymerase chain reaction(PCR) and HC2-HPV-DNA, were used to detect the infection status of 13 high-risk HPV types during women's health examination. The examined women were divided into four groups according to age (23 to 29 years old, 30 to 39 years old, 40 to 49 years old, and 50 to 58 years old). Statistical methods were applied to analyze the results. Results:The detected positive rates by fluorescence quantitation PCR and HC2-HPV-DNA were 15.93%(140/879) and 11.83%(104/879), respectively, among the 879 examined women. The common positive and negative rates were 9.56%(84/879) and 81.80%(719/879), respectively. The results of the two methods showed that the infection positive rate was obviously higher in the 40 to 49 year old and 50 to 58 year old groups. Statistical difference was observed between fluorescence quantitation PCR and HC2-HPV-DNA in detecting high-risk HPV types (P40 years old who are at high risk of HPV, to prevent uterine cervical cancer efficiently.

Comparative analysis of three methods for HPV DNA detection in cervical samples / Análisis comparativo de tres métodos para la detección del ADN de VPH en muestras de cuello uterino

High risk HPV infection is considered to play a central role in cervical carcinogenesis. HPV DNA testing has shown to be a very useful tool for screening and following cervical infections. The aim of this study was to compare three methods for HPV DNA detection, along with cytology and colposcopy analysis. Cervical samples were collected from 100 sexually active women in Mérida, western Venezuela. HPV infection was screened using Hybrid-Capture 2 (HC2), L1-Nested-PCR and E6/E7-PCR assays. 40% of the samples (40/100) were HPV positive by at least one of the DNA detection methods. HC2 detected HPV in 12% specimens. L1- and E6/E7-PCRs showed 50% sensitivity and 77% specificity.The agreement rate between HC2 and both PCR assays was 65%. Kappa value showed moderate concordance between HC2 and both PCR methods (κ=0.55; CI 95%). Also moderate concordance was seen when L1- and E6/E7-PCRs were compared (κ=0.48; CI 95%). There was a significant association between the Schiller test and E6/E7-PCR (p=0.006) for HPV infection. An acceptable agreement between all three assays for HPV detection was observed. Nevertheless, different PCR formats need to be further analyzed in order to make the right choice of method for HPV testing.

La infección con VPH de alto riesgo es el principal factor etiológico asociado al desarrollo de carcinogénesis cervical y las pruebas de detección de ADN-VPH han mostrado ser una herramienta esencial para la pesquisa y seguimiento de estas infecciones. El objetivo del estudio ha sido comparar tres métodos para la detección del ADN viral, en combinación con los análisis colposcópico y citológico. Se obtuvieron muestras cervicales de 100 mujeres sexualmente activas, en Mérida, Venezuela. La detección de infecciones por VPH se realizó por Captura Híbrida 2 (CH2) y los ensayos de PCR “L1-Nested-PCR” y “E6/E7-PCR”. 40% de las muestras (40/100) fueron positivas para VPH por al menos uno de los métodos aplicados. 12% de las muestras analizadas fueron positivas para VPH por CH2. Las dos PCR utilizadas mostraron un 50% de sensibilidad y 77% de especificidad. La coincidencia observada entre CH2 y las dos PCR fue del 65%. La determinación del valor Kappa mostró una concordancia moderada entre CH2 y ambos métodos de PCR (κ=0,55; CI 95%). También existió concordancia moderada al comparar las PCR de las regiones L1 y E6/E7 de VPH (κ=0,48; CI 95%). Hubo una asociación significativa entre el resultado del test de Schiller y la PCR E6/E7 (p=0,006) para la infección por VPH. Se determinó una concordancia aceptable entre los tres métodos aplicados para la detección de VPH; sin embargo, las PCR deben ser analizadas en trabajos futuros con el fin de establecer las pruebas más adecuadas para la detección viral.

Comparison of the Novel Human Papillomavirus 4 Auto-capillary Electrophoresis Test with the Hybrid Capture 2 Assay and with the PCR HPV Typing Set Test in the Detection of High-Risk HPV Including HPV 16 and 18 Genotypes in Cervical Specimens

The aim of this study was to compare the novel human papillomavirus (HPV) detection method, the HPV 4 Auto-capillary Electrophoresis (ACE) test with the hybrid capture (HC) 2 assay for the detection of high-risk HPVs. In addition, we compared the HPV 4 ACE test with the polymerase chain reaction HPV Typing Set test for the detection of HPV 16 and HPV 18 genotypes. One hundred ninety-nine cervical swab samples obtained from women with previous abnormal Pap smears were subjected to testing with the three HPV tests. The HPV 4 ACE test and the HC 2 assay showed substantial agreement for detection of high-risk HPVs (85.4%, kappa=0.71). The HPV 4 ACE test also showed substantial agreement with the PCR HPV Typing Set test in the detection of HPV 16 and HP V 18 genotypes (89.9%, kappa=0.65). In correlation with cytologic results, the sensitivities and specificities of the HPV 4 ACE test and HC 2 assay were 92.9% vs. 92.9% and 48.1% vs. 50.8%, respectively, when high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were regarded as abnormal cytologies. The novel HPV 4 ACE test is a valuable tool for the detection of high-risk HPVs and for genotyping of HPV 16 and HPV 18.