Management of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2杗egative metastatic breast cancer: Role of poly adenosine diphosphate (ADP?ribose) polymerase inhibitors

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)?negative subset is the most heterogeneous group of metastatic breast cancers (MBCs) as it includes both hormone receptor (HR)?positive and HR?negative breast cancer (or TNBC), which have different therapies and treatment challenges. Though endocrine therapy (ET) remains the treatment backbone in HR?positive HER2?negative cases, about 40% of the patients show intrinsic or acquired resistance to ET due to multiple mechanisms. Combining different therapies such as ET and other targeted therapies with or without chemotherapy fails to give continued benefit, unlike cyclin?dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors that have shown a great benefit. TNBC has conventionally been treated ineffectively with systemic chemotherapy. Recently, poly (ADP?ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have emerged for HER2?negative breast cancer (BC) patients, including TNBC. Olaparib and talazoparib have recently been approved in germline BRCA?mutated (gBRCAm) HER2?negative MBC. Additionally, ongoing trials of PARPi in combination with various therapies are expected to provide more and better treatment options for gBRCAm HER2?negative breast cancer.

Efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer

Context: Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (Nab-PTX) is a form of paclitaxel bound to albumin nanoparticles and is used widely in a neoadjuvant setting for patients with breast cancer. Aims: We conducted a retrospective study to compare the efficacy and safety of Nab-PTX to PTX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with operable HER2-negative breast cancer. Settings and Design: In total, 50 patients were enrolled. Nab-PTX was administered in the study group, and PTX was administered in the control group. Subjects and Methods: The clinical response and safety profile were recorded. The expression of secreted protein acidic rich in cysteine (SPARC) in tumor tissue was examined. Statistical Analysis: The efficacy and safety analyses were computed using SPSS statistical software. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the exploratory variables (age, stage, estrogen receptor, partial response, and SPARC expression) for the pathological complete response (pCR), and Fisher's exact test was performed to evaluate the relationship between SPARC and pCR. Results: Both groups of patients achieved a good clinical response. The pCR rate for the Nab-PTX regimen was significantly higher than that for the PTX regimen. The most common adverse events were neutropenia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, arthralgia, and myalgia. In 68% of cases in the Nab-PTX group, high SPARC expression was observed. Conclusions: As neoadjuvant therapy, the Nab-PTX regimen has advantages over conventional taxane regimen in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer. With this regimen, a high pCR rate was achieved with a good safety profile