RESUMO
Objective:To investigate the value of the 8-channel eye surface phased array coil in improving image quality and demonstrating ocular masses on 3.0 T MR scanner.Methods:From July 2018 to January 2020, the data of orbital MRI in 692 patients with ocular masses on 6 medical centers were prospectively collected. The patients were simple randomly assigned into 8-channel eye surface phased array coil group (413 patients) or 8-channel head phased array coil group (279 patients), with the same MRI sequences. The signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were calculated in orbital anatomy structures and masses (eyelid mass, intraocular mass, lacrimal mass and orbital mass). The image quality scores including motion artifact, mass margin, the relationship between the mass and adjacent structures, and overall image quality were recorded. The differences of image quality between the two groups were compared by two independent sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank test. Results:The SNR and CNR were higher in eye surface coil group than those in head coil group ( P<0.05). The scores of ocular movement artifacts were higher in head coil group than those in surface coil group ( P<0.05). The scores of intraocular mass margin, the relationship between the mass and adjacent structures, and overall image quality were higher in surface coil group than those in head coil group ( P<0.001). There were no significant differences in mass margin, the relationship between the mass and adjacent structures, and overall image quality scores of eyelid, lacrimal gland, and orbital mass between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:3.0 T MR scanner combined with the 8-channel eye surface phased array coil can improve the SNR and CNR of orbital MR images, the demonstration of the intraocular mass margin and the relationship between the mass and adjacent structures.
RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the clinical application of 15-channel phased-array head coil and 6-channel dS Flex M surface coil in MRI imaging of temporomandibular joint.Methods Totally 50 patients were randomly equally assigned into two groups, of whom, one group used a 15-channel phase-array head coil for MRI scanning, and the other applied a 6-channel dS Flex M surface coil. The same regions of interest were set up to measure and analyze the signal to noise ratio (SNR)and contrast to noise ratio (CNR)of each region respectively.SPSS 19.0 software was used for quantitative analysis. Results The head coil had the SNR and the CNR higher than those of the surface coil.The head coil and Flex surface coil had the imaging diagnosis rates being 95.83% and 91.67% respectively,and there was no significant difference between them(P>0.05). Conclusion Both phase-array head coil and dS Flex M surface coil can be used for temporomandibular joint MRI imaging, and it's suggested that conventional imaging be executed with dS Flex M surface coil and functional imaging be implemented with head coil.