Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine ; (12): 780-784, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-819967

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE@#To compare the sensitivity and specificity of direct fecal smear microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction in the detection of Blastocystis sp. in human stool.@*METHODS@#Human stool samples were collected from a community in San Isidro, Rodriguez, Rizal, Philippines. These samples were subjected to direct fecal smear microscopy, culture and polymerase chain reaction to detect the presence of Blastocystis sp.@*RESULTS@#Of the 110 stool samples collected, 28 (25%) were detected positive for the presence of Blastocystis sp. by two or more tests. Culture method detected the highest number of Blastocystis-positive stool samples (n=36), followed by PCR of DNA extracted from culture (n=26), PCR of DNA extracted from stool (n=10), and direct fecal smear (n=9). Compared to culture, the sensitivity of the other detection methods were 66.7% for PCR from culture and 19.4% for both PCR from stool and direct fecal smear. Specificity of the methods was high, with PCR from culture and direct fecal smear having 97.3%, while PCR from stool at 95.9%.@*CONCLUSIONS@#In this study, in vitro culture is the best method for detecting Blastocystis sp. in human stool samples.


Assuntos
Humanos , Blastocystis , Biologia Celular , Genética , Infecções por Blastocystis , Diagnóstico , Parasitologia , Técnicas de Cultura de Células , Métodos , Fezes , Parasitologia , Microscopia , Métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA