A Case of Gastric Wall Hematoma and Ischemic Necrosis After Endoscopic Biopsy / 영남의대학술지

Hematoma of gastric wall is very rare, and occasionally associated with coagulopathy, trauma, peptic ulcer disease, and therapeutic endoscopy. Ischemic gastric necrosis is also rare because of the abundant anastomotic supply to the stomach, and it is usually associated with surgery and disruption of the major vessels. Endoscopic submucosal injection of hypertonic saline-epinephrine (HS-E) is a safe, cost-effective, and widely used therapy for hemostasis but it may cause tissue necrosis and perforation. We describe a case of gastric wall hematoma with oozing bleeding after endoscopic gastric mucosa biopsy in 71-year old woman with chronic renal failure and angina pectoris undergoing anti-platelet medication. We injected a small dose of HS-E (7ml) for controlling oozing bleeding. Two days later, endoscopy showed huge ulcer with necrotic tissue at the site of previously hematoma. Therefore we should pay particular attention for hematoma and mucosal necrosis when performing endoscopic procedure in a patients with high bleeding and atherosclerotic risk.

A Case of Mucosal Necrosis of the Stomach after Endoscopic Injection Therapy with Hypertonic Saline-Epinephrine (HS-E) for a Bleeding Peptic Ulcer with an Exposed Vessel / 대한소화기내시경학회지

Peptic ulcer bleeding is a frequent cause of upper G-I bleeding. Endoscopic injection therapy with hypertonic saline-epinephrine (HS-E) is a cost-effective and widely used therapy for hemostasis; however, 1~3% of patients experience bleeding or perforation. A 70 year-old male patient was admitted with melena and hematemesis. An endoscopy on admission showed the presence of a 1 cm- sized well-demarcated ulcer with pulsatile bleeding at the lesser curvature of the distal antrum. Approximately 28 mL of HS-E solution was injected around the exposed vessel. Follow-up endoscopy performed 7 days later showed the presence of a 2 cm-sized newly developed mucosa necrosis at the lesser curvature of the pyloric channel, which was caused by ischemic necrosis of the gastric mucosa after HS-E injection. Endoscopic injection therapy with HS-E solution is a relatively safe technique, but mucosa necrosis can occur with the use of a dose of HS-E that is considered safe. We report a case of gastric mucosa necrosis following endoscopic HS-E injection therapy of a bleeding peptic ulcer.

Controlled Comparison of Endoscopic Epinephrine Injection and Endoscopic Argon Plasma Coagulation for the Treatment of Acute Peptic Ulcer Bleeding / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic injection therapy with hypertonic saline Epinephrine (HSE) is the easiest and most widely used procedure for the management of peptic ulcer bleeding. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is a recently introduced endoscopic hemostatic procedure. Thus, we performed a prospective trial to compare the hemostatic efficacy of APC and HSE. METHODS: Forty patients with the diagnosis of bleeding ulcer were randomly assigned to receive either HSE (n=20) or APC (n=20) treatment during the period of September 2003 to April 2004. The two groups were matched for gender, age, site of bleeding, the endoscopic findings and the initial hemoglobin at the study baseline. RESULTS: The bleeding was initially controlled in 18 patients (90%) of the APC group, and in 20 patients (100%) of the HSE group. Rebeeding occurred in one patient (5%) of the APC group and in 3 patients (15.5%) of the HSE group. The lengths of stay in the hospital were 11.7 days in the APC group and 10.7 days in the HSE group. Death occurred in 1 case in the APC group and in 1 case in the HSE group. The initial hemostatic efficacy showed no difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Argon plasma coagulation is as effective as hypertonic saline epinephrine injection for the initial management of acute peptic ulcer bleeding.

Hemostatic Effect of Endoscopic Hemoclip Method, Hypertonic Saline Epinephrine Injection Method and Their Combined Method for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND: Bleeding peptic ulcer is the most common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Various different endoscopic hemostatic methods were introduced to treat bleeding peptic ulcer. Many studies reported the efficacy and comparision of various methods. Endoscopic injection therapy is the most comman method among them because it is inexpensive and easy in use. Complications of injection therapy such as aggravation of bleeding, tissue neerosis and perforation were repoted rarely. Recently endoscopic hemoclipping method is considered to be safe and effective hemostatic method for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: During the period between January 1993 and August 1996, we have conducted clinical trial and retrospective analysis among 100 patients in whom active bleeding or visible vessel was identified. RESULTS: 1) Three groups was divided, Hemoclip group 26 cases, Hypertonic Saline Epinephrine(HSE) group 59 cases, Combination group 15 cases. 2) The sources of bleeding in Hemoclip group were gastric ulcer in 23 Cases and duodenal ulcer in 3 cases, and in HSE group, gastric ulcer in 44 case, duodenal ulcer 14 cases and stomal ulcer in one case, and in combination group, gastric ulcer in 10 cases, duodenal ulcer in 3 cases and stomal ulcer in two cases. HSE and combination method were performed more than Hemoclip method in duodenal ulcer(23.7% and 20.0% versus 11.5%). 3) As the stigmata of bleeding in Hemoclip and HSE and Combination group, spurting were seen in 5 cases and 3 cases and 4 cases, and oozing in 10 cases and 17 cases and 3 cases, and nonbleeding visible vessel in 11 cases and 39 cases and 8 cases, respectively. Hemoclip method was performed more than HSE method in active bleeding state(57.6% versus 33.9%). 4) Initial hemostasis was achieved in 24 cases(92.3%) in Hemoclip group and 52 cases(88.1%) in HSE group, 13 cases(86.7%) in Combination group. 5) The rebleeding developed in 1 case(4.2%) in Hemoclip group and 8 cases(15.4%) in HSE group and 1 case(7.6%) in Combination group, the emergent operation was undewent 2 cases(7.7%) in Hemoclip group and 10 cases(17.0%) in HSE group and 1 case(6.7%) in Combination group, respectively. 6) The death was noticed in 1 cases(3.9%) in Hemoclip group and 2 cases(3.4%) in HSE group and 2 case(13.3%) in Combination group, repectively. 7) Permanent hemostasis by only endoscopic treatment was achieved in 24 cases(92.3%) in Hemoclip group and 48 cases(81.4%) in HSE group, 12 cases(80.0%) in Combination group. 8) Complication was noticed only in HSE group, aggravation of bleeding in one case and hematoma in two cases. CONCLUSION: Hemoclip method was effective hemostatic method same as HSE injection method, and safe method weth low complication in bleeding peptic ulcer. We suggest more detail selection of endoscopic hemostatic method in variously individualized endoscopic features.

Comparison of Endoscopic Injection with Hypertonic Saline-Epinephrine(HSE) and Absolute Ethanol for Bleeding Peptic Ulcers / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The endoscopic injection therapy with hypertonic saline-epinephrine(HSE) and absolute ethanol are the most widely and easily used procedure in the management of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. We performed a prospective, randomized trial to compare the hemostatic efficacy between HSE and absolute ethanol injection therapy. METHODS: During the period of 1993 to 1996, 60 patients who were identified as active bleeding or visible vessel were enrolled for this trial. The 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups(HSE group, 30 cases: ethhnol group, 30 cases). We performed endoscopic injection therapy with 3% saline and 1:10,000 epinephrine solution in HSE group, and with 99.5% absolute ethanol in ethanol group. The two groups were matched for sex, age, site of bleeding, endoscopic findings, initial hemoglobin, and concomitant illness at randomization. RESULTS: Bleeding was initially controlled in 21(70%) of the HSE group and in 29(96.7%) of the ethanol group(p < 0.05). Rebleeding occurred in 4(19%) of the HSE group and in 2(6.9%) of the ethanol group(p < 0.1). The ethanl group achieved a better hemostatic effect for spurting hemorrhage(3/13 vs 9/10, p < 0.05). The emergent operations were undergone in 10(33.3%) and 2(6.7%) for HSE group and ethanol group respectively(p < 0.01). The stay in hospital were less than in ethanol group(mean 9.5 vs 16.3, p < 0.01). The death were noticed in 6 cases(20%) in HSE group and 1 case(3.3%) in ethanol group(p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that absolute ethanol injection is more efficaceous and better satisfactory method in peptic ulcer bleeding.

Hemostatic Effect of Endoscopic Local Injection of Hypertonic Saline - Epinephrine Solution in Peptic Ulcer Bleeding / 대한소화기내시경학회지

To date several agents have been used to achieve hemostasis in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers using endoscopic sclerotherapy techniques. In this study, the efficacy of endoscopic local injections of hypertonie saline-epinephrine(HS-E) solution, consisting of 9 volume of 3% sodium chloride and 1 volume of 1: 1000 epinephrine, on the base of the ulcer around bleeding vessel was assessed. During the period between April 1989 and July l992, 127 patients were admitted to the study. Ninety-six of these patients underwent endoscopic treatmeat(endoscopic treatment group), while the other 31 cases received conservative treatment only(conservative treatment group). (continue...)