The Utility of the Inferior Vena Cava/Aorta Diameter Index in Trauma Patients

PURPOSE: An accurate assessment of body fluid status is a significant challenge during every clinical examination. In many disorders, the therapy and its effectiveness depend on appropriate evaluation of body fluid state, especially in the trauma patient. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of the IVC/aorta diameter index on abdominal CT scans and to determine whether? The IVC/aorta diameter index was useful for predicting the outcome of trauma patients in the emergency department. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of data acquired between December 2008 and April 2009. We included 108 trauma patients who received abdominal CT in the emergency department. Persons who had a major medical problem such as liver cirrhosis, or who were transferred from other hospitals for ICU care, or who were younger than 15 years, were excluded. IVC and aorta were measured below the infrarenal vein in the abdominal CT in an axial view. Clinical assessment included the patient's final diagnosis, blood pressure, heart rate, weight and whether he was dead or not. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to find the value of the IVC/aorta diameter index that maximized the sum of the sensitivity and specificity. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0. RESULTS: We studied 135 patients (trauma 108 and non trauma 27). The mean IVC/aorta diameter index of nontrauma patients was 1.26+/-0.17; for trauma patients it was 0.80+/-0.33. The average IVC/aorta index in the shock group at arrival were significantly smaller than in the non shock group (0.57+/-0.27 versus 0.89+/-0.3). CONCLUSION: The inferior vena cava/aorta diameter index in trauma patients is useful in assessment of injury severity and prognosis.

The Accuracy of the ICD-10 Code for Trauma Patients Visiting on Emergency Department and the Error in the ICISS

PURPOSE: We designed a retrospective study to measure the accuracy of the ICD-10 (International Classification of Disease-10) code for trauma patients. We also analyzed the error of the ICISS (International Classification of Disease based Injury Severity Score) due to a missing or an incorrect ICD-10 code. METHODS: For the measuring the accuracy of the ICD-10 code for trauma patients in a tertiary teaching hospital's emergency department, two board certified emergency physician performed a retrospective chart review. The ICD-10 code was classified as a main code or a sub-code. The main code was defined as the code of the main department of treatment, and the sub-code was defined as a code other than the main code. We calculated and compared two ICISS for each patient one by using both the existing code and the other by using a corrected code. We compared the proportions of severe trauma (defined as an ICISS less than 0.9) between when the existing code and the corrected code was used respectively. RESULTS: We reviewed the records of 4287 trauma patients who had been treated from July 2008 to November 2008. The accuracy of the main code, the sub-code of emergency department, main-code, the subcode of hospitalized patients were 97.1%, 59.8%, 98.2% and 57.0%, respectively. Total accuracy of the main and sub-code of emergency department and of hospitalized patients were 91.4% and 58.6%. The number of severe trauma patients increased from 33 to 49 when the corrected code was used in emergency department and increased from 35 to 60 in hospitalized patients. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the sub-code was lower than that of the main code. A missing or incorrect subcode could cause an error in the ICISS and in the number of patients with severe trauma.

Validation of the International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition Based Injury Severity Score(ICISS) / 예방의학회지

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive power of International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition(ICD-10) based International Classification of Diseases based Injury Severity Score(ICISS) with Trauma and Injury Severity Score(TRISS) and International Classification of Diseases 9th Edition Clinical Modification(ICD-9CM) based ICISS in the injury severity measure. METHODS: ICD-10 version of Survival Risk Ratios(SRRs) was derived from 47,750 trauma patients from 35 Emergency Centers for 1 year. The predictive power of TRISS, the ICD-9CM based ICISS and ICD-10 based ICISS were compared in a group of 367 severely injured patients admitted to two university hospitals. The predictive power was compared by using the measures of discrimination(disparity, sensitivity, specificity, misclassification rates, and ROC curve analysis) and calibration(Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics), all calculated by logistic regression procedure. RESULTS: ICD-10 based ICISS showed a lower performance than TRISS and ICD-9CM based ICISS. When age and Revised Trauma Score(RTS) were incorporated into the survival probability model, however, ICD-10 based ICISS full model showed a similar predictive power compared with TRISS and ICD-9CM based ICISS full model. ICD-10 based ICISS had some disadvantages in predicting outcomes among patients with intracranial injuries. However, such weakness was largely compensated by incorporating age and RTS in the model. CONCLUSIONS: The ICISS methodology can be extended to ICD-10 horizon as a standard injury severity measure in the place of TRISS, especially when age and RTS were incorporated in the model. In patients with intracranial injuries, the predictive power of ICD-10 based ICISS was relatively low because of differences in the classifying system between ICD-10 and ICD-9CM.

Performance Evaluation of Emergency Medical Center / 예방의학회지

Currently, there are 100 community emergency centers which expect to provide professional emergency care like Level 1 trauma centers in U.S.A. To evaluate Performance of emergency center, most studies have been widely adopted death rate based methods such as Trauma and Injury Severity Score(TRISS) and A Severity Characterization of Trauma(ASCOT). However, these methods are only applicable in situation where registration process of trauma patients is well established. Therefore, an alternative method should be applied to evaluate performance of emergency centers in Korea which does not have well-developed registration scheme. This study aims to develop new performance measures which are applicable to Korea and evaluate performance of 35 community emergency centers through new measures. The new measures are included that 'W-statistic' ; death rate calculated on the basis of International Classification based Injury Severity Score(ICISS), and 'the degree of severity' ; rate of severe trauma patients of each emergency medical centers. The study results can be summarized as follows. First, about 34% of sample emergency centers show they provide proper care in terms of their function. Second, tertiary hospitals, university hospitals, and hospitals located in Seoul show higher severity degree of patients and lower severity-adjusted death rate.