Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 14(3): 322-324, May-June 2010. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-556851

RESUMO

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia is still one of the two major assays available for diagnosis and monitoring of CMV infections. A commercial rapid test recently available in Brazil for quantification of human cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia revealed by immunofluorescence technique was compared with the original in-house method revealed by immunoperoxidase in patients receiving solid organ transplants. Of 80 blood samples tested for CMV antigenemia, 34 (42.5 percent) were positive: commercial assay detected 33 (97 percent) and in-house assay detected 20 (58.8 percent) samples. The numbers of positive cells in the two assays were different, with a median of 4.5 and 12 positive cells obtained by in-house and commercial kit, respectively. Discrepancies between assays occurred in 15 specimens from patients with low-grade antigenemia (median 6 positive cells). The assay-time was reduced in approximately 50 percent compared to in-house methodology. In conclusion, besides comparable results obtained for both assays, the commercial antigenemia assay provides more rapid and sensitive results.


Assuntos
Humanos , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Citomegalovirus/imunologia , Imunofluorescência/métodos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/métodos , Transplante de Órgãos , Fosfoproteínas/sangue , Proteínas da Matriz Viral/sangue , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA