Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
The Journal of Practical Medicine ; (24): 445-448, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-743751

RESUMO

Objective To compare the effects of the equivalent analgesic doses of sufentanil, fentanyl and dizosin on index of consciousness (IoC) and their adverse reactions. Methods Eighty patients undergoing painless gastroenteroscopy, aged 18~60 years, ASA grade Ⅰ to Ⅱ, were selected. The patients were randomly divided into control group (group C) , sufentanil group (group S) , fentanyl group (group F) , and dizosin group (group D) , with 20 cases in each group. Sufentanil 0.1~0.2 μg/kg, fentanyl 1~2μg/kg and dizocine 0.1~0.2 mg/kg were intravenously injected in group S, F and D respectively. Group C was given saline of equal volume, and then propofol 2~2.5 mg/kg was intravenously injected until consciousness disappeared.Intravenous infusion of propofol50~100 g/ (kg · min) maintained anesthesia. Heart rate, blood pressure, IoC and perioperative adverse events were recorded. Results There was no significant difference in operative time and recovery time among the 4 groups (P> 0.05). Compared with those in group C, the values of IoC at T2, TS, T4 and T5 in group S and F increased significantly (P < 0.05) , and the correlation coefficient between OAA/S and IoC was 0.872 (P < 0.05). Compared with that in group C, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was higher in group D, and the incidence of injection pain was significantly lower in group S, F and D (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with propofol alone, opioids used in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy anesthesia lead to loss of consciousness and increase of IoC value at recovery time, but have no significant effect on recovery time.

2.
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology ; (12): 444-446, 2015.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-479890

RESUMO

Objective To compare the accuracy of bispectral index (BIS),Narcotrend index (NI),index of consciousness (IoC) versus auditory evoked potential index (AAI) in monitoring the depth of sedation induced by propofol.Methods Sixty ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients of both sexes,aged 41-64 yr,with body mass index 20-30 kg/m2,scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia,were enrolled in the study.Propofol was given by target-controlled infusion (TCI) with the initial target effect-site concentration (Ce) of 0.8 μg/ml using Marsh pharmacokinetic model,and then the Ce of propofol was increased by 0.1 μg/ml,and OAA/S was performed.Before TCI of propofol,the values of BIS,NI,IoC and AAI were recorded,and at the same time the value of OAA/S score was 5.During TCI of propofol,when OAA/S score reached 4,3,2 and 1 in turn,the Ce of propofol was recorded,the sequence for determination of the values of BIS,NI,IoC and AAI was determined using a random number table,and the values were then recorded for 5 s after the values were stable and then averaged.The parameters for vital signs were maintained within the normal range.Pearson correlation of BIS,NI,IoC and AAI values with Ce of propofol was analyzed.Results The correlation coefficients of BIS,NI,IoC and AAI values with the Ce of propofol were rBIs-Ce =-0.829,rSI-Ce =-0.886,rloC-Ce =-0.881 and rAAI-Ce =-0.791,respectively.There was no significant difference between rBIS-Ce,rNI-Ce,rIoC-Ce and rAAI-Ce.Conclusion There are no significant differences in the accuracy of BIS,NI,IoC or AAI in monitoring the depth of sedation induced by propofol in middle-aged patients with non-noxious stimuli.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA