RESUMO
Background:Urticaria or hives, that occur everywhere on the body. It start with small eruption to large wheals, with acute almost always being an allergic reaction. It is due to unknown reason and always bothers to patients in his/her routine life. Objectives:To study efficacy of Homoeopathic medicine in case of Urticaria.Material And Methods:Study of Urticaria cases with efficacy of Homoeopathic medicines through case study after defining, analyzing then further testing data for accuracy. Selection of medicine was depending on concept of individualization. Selection of potency and repetition was based on Homoeopathic posology which describe in Organon of Medicine.Result:In study mostly adults are more affected and acute cases are more presented. Mostly medium to high potency was used. Conclusion:Our study has concluded that Homoeopathic medicine has shown the efficacy in treatment of Urticaria. Cases were under the supervision of Homoeopathic physician (Dr. Manisha Boricha).
RESUMO
Las sociedades europeas están experimentando importantes cambios en los pilares axiológicos y políticos de su modelo social. Las políticas sociales y de empleo contemporáneas tienen como principal característica un desplazamiento radical hacia la psicologización y moralización del trabajo. Un análisis de las nociones centrales del discurso de las instituciones europeas sobre el trabajo (empleabilidad, activación, flexiguridad) permite desvelar las doxas o presupuestos que lo fundamentan. La paradoja es una estructura retórica fundamental de este discurso. Esta paradoja es reveladora del carácter perverso del discurso neoliberal que, por un lado, apela a la responsabilidad personal, pero, por otro, desprovee al sujeto de las condiciones sociales y políticas necesarias para el ejercicio de la autonomía.
European societies are undergoing important changes in the axiological and political pillars of its social model. One of the main current features of social and employment policies is a radical shift towards the psychologization and moralization of work. An analysis of the key concepts of the EU discourse on employment (employability, activation, flexicurity) allows unveiling the underlying doxas and assumptions. The paradox is a principally rhetorical structure of this discourse. This paradox reveals the perverse nature of the neoliberal discourse which, on the one hand, appeals to personal responsibility, but on the other hand, it deprives to subject of the social and political conditions necessary to be autonomous.