RESUMO
The objective of current study was to compare the efficacy of three different anaesthesia induction approachesi.e. Inj propofol, Inj etomidate and admixture of Inj propofol and Inj etomidate in maintaining hemodynamicstability during induction and following Proseal LMA insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patientswere randomly divided in to 3 groups with 90 patients each and received 2.5mg/kg of propofol(P), 0.3mg/kgof etomidate(E) and 1mg/kg of propofol+0.2mg/kg of etomidate which was mixed in a 20ml syringe. We alsostudied side-effects like PONV, myoclonus, pain on Injection, allergic reactions and thrombophlebitis. Wefound that the use of P-E admixture for induction of Proseal LMA provides hemodynamic stability as itprevents hypotension caused by propofol and also hypertension caused by etomidate when used alone. Admixturewas also associated with less incidence of other side effects like PONV, pain on Injection and myoclonus. Weconcluded that combination of propofol and etomidate for induction of anaesthesia for Proseal LMA issignificantly better than either drug used alone
RESUMO
Background: Induction of anaesthesia with propofol is often associated with a significant decrease in arterial pressure, especially in the older population. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of phenylephrine in two different doses i.e. 100mcg and 200mcg, given during induction to counteract the anticipated hypotensive effect of propofol in older patients aged over 55 years. Methods: Seventy-two ASA physical status I – II patients aged 55 years or older were randomly allocated to group 1 (received propofol mixed with normal saline), group 2 (propofol mixed with 100mcg of phenylephrine) or group 3 (propofol mixed with 200mcg of pheynylphrine). Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl 1.5mcg/kg and propofol 2mg/kg (mixed with the study drug). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at 1 minute intervals for up to 5 minutes after induction. Results: SBP, MAP and DBP decreased significantly after induction in the control group and group 2 (phenylephrine 100mcg). In contrast, SBP was maintained to near baseline for the first two minutes after induction using phenylephrine 200mcg in group 3, and similar trends were seen with MAP and DBP at a lesser magnitude. Conclusion: Phenylephrine 200mcg is more effective than 100mcg in attenuating propofol induced hypotension, especially during the first two minutes after induction, in patients aged 55 years and above.