Safety and immunogenicity of a split-virion quadrivalent influenza vaccine / 预防医学

Objective @# To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a split-virion quadrivalent influenza vaccine.@*Methods @#The healthy people aged three years or over in Wuyang County and Xiping County of Henan Province were divided into the experimental group, control group 1 and control group 2, and were vaccinated with split-virion quadrivalent influenza vaccines, split-virion trivalent influenza vaccines (without B/Victoria) and a split-virion trivalent influenza vaccines (without B/Yamagata) , respectively. The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies were detected before and after immunization. The incidence rate of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) , HI antibody positive conversion rate, the protection rate of HI antibodies and the growth of geometric mean titer (GMT) were calculated and compared with the standard of Food and Drug Administration (FDA).@*Results@#Totally 2 924 people were recruited, with 975 in the experimental group, 974 in the control group 1 and 975 in control group 2. The incidence rate of AEFI in the experimental group was 11.7%, higher than 7.9% in control group 1 and 8.8% in control group 2 (P < 0.05) during 30 minutes and 8 days after inoculation. The positive conversion rates of HI antibodies of H1N1, H3N2, By and Bv in the experimental group were 78.5%, 53.3%, 78.3% and 62.9%, respectively. The rate differences of the positive conversion rates of HI antibodies of By between the experimental group and control group 2, and of Bv between the experimental group and control group 1 were 42.1% (95%CI: 38.0%-46.2%) and 33.2% (95%CI: 28.9%-37.5%) , with both lower limits of 95%CI more than -0.10. The GMT increase of HI antibodies was more than 2.5 times in the three groups. The protective rates of HI antibodies of H1N1, H3N2, By and Bv in the experimental group were 87.7%, 98.7%, 93.6% and 77.2%, respectively. The protective rates of HI antibodies of By in control group 2 and Bv in control group 1 were 71.1% and 51.0%, both lower than those in the experimental group (P < 0.05).@*Conclusions @#After the inoculation of the quadrivalent influenza vaccine, the positive conversion rates (>40%) , protection rates (>70%) and GMT increase (>2.5 times) of HI antibodies of H1N1, H3N2, By and Bv all meet the quality standards of FDA. The safety and immunogenicity of the quadrivalent influenza vaccine are not inferior to those of the trivalent influenza vaccine.

Determination of the contents of two types of hemagglutinin B in quadrivalent influenza vaccines (split virion) by single radial immunodiffusion assay / 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志

Objective@#Quadrivalent influenza vaccines contain two lineages of type B virus, this study aimed to assess whether the result of single radial immunodiffusion (SRID) are accurate. The cross-interference of two type B hemagglutinins remains unknown.@*Methods@#We detected the vaccine samples developed by Jiangsu GDK Biological Technology Co., ltd by SRID.@*Results@#There was no significant difference between the HA content of antigen reagent, bulk sample and mixed sample of two B bulk within 10 to 40 μg/ml (P>0.05). Then each hemagglutinin B was diluted respectively by other three HA, 30 μg/ml, the other hemagglutinin B or phosphate buffer solution were measured within 10-160 μg/ml. Within 10-40 μg/ml, the HA content was proportional to the diameters of immunodiffusion (R2=0.998), while within the higher content range, a ternary linear regression equation fitted best (R2=0.999).@*Conclusions@#No cross-interference between B/Brisbane and B/Phuket was found in SRID within both detection ranges.

Safety and immunogenicity of influenza vaccine (split virion) in humans / 中华微生物学和免疫学杂志

Objective To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a split-virion influenza vac-cine after its manufacturing process was improved. Methods The immunological non-inferiority of trial to control vaccines was evaluated in 240 subjects aged 3-<18 years. Another 360 subjects aged 18-<60 years were randomly divided into three groups that were respectively given three consecutive lots of trail vaccine to assess the consistency of immunogenicity. Results There were 4. 17% of the subjects aged 3-<18 years showed adverse reactions following immunization with trail vaccine and it was not significantly different from that of the control group (P>0. 05). No significant difference in seroconversion rate, geometric mean titer (GMT) of haemagglutination inhibition antibodies(HIAb) or protection rate was found between trial and control groups (P>0. 05). No significant difference in seroconversion rate or HIAb GMT was found among the three lots (P>0. 05). Conclusion The trial influenza vaccine has good safety, immunogenicity and lot-to-lot consistency after the manufacturing process was improved.