Two routes of administration of mitomycin C in a trabeculectomy

Background: The introduction of mitomycin C (MMC) as an adjunct to trabeculectomy was a major advance in the ability to improve the Intra ocular pressure lowering efficiency of the procedure. The time tested traditional way of administration of MMC is via a sponges soaked in it, duration and concentration varies depending on risk of failure. A subconjunctival injection of MMC instead of these sponges is recently being used as a promising alternative. Purpose: Here is the video demonstrating the 2 possible ways to prepare and apply MMC during a trabeculectomy surgery. Synopsis: Intraoperative injection of MMC in trabeculectomy has several advantages over conventional method ofsponge application. A large MMC treatment area produces more diffuse and elevated blebs. Large-area MMC application also seems to increase long-term success without increasing the complication rates in trabeculectomies. Direct and diffuse application of MMC by injection may promote less scarring and vascularization of the bleb. To achieve the same surface area of exposure with sponges, i.e.achieved with injection, the surgeon must use multiple sponges, all of which must be carefully collected thereafter. The injection method,therefore,eliminates the risk of retained sponges. Highlights: injection of MMC may be as safe and as effective as conventional sponge application of MMC with comparable estimated complete treatment success with relatively lower complication rates

Two routes of administration of mitomycin C in a trabeculectomy

Background: The introduction of mitomycin C (MMC) as an adjunct to trabeculectomy was a major advance in the ability to improve the Intra ocular pressure lowering efficiency of the procedure. The time tested traditional way of administration of MMC is via a sponges soaked in it, duration and concentration varies depending on risk of failure. A subconjunctival injection of MMC instead of these sponges is recently being used as a promising alternative. Purpose: Here is the video demonstrating the 2 possible ways to prepare and apply MMC during a trabeculectomy surgery. Synopsis: Intraoperative injection of MMC in trabeculectomy has several advantages over conventional method ofsponge application. A large MMC treatment area produces more diffuse and elevated blebs. Large?area MMC application also seems to increase long?term success without increasing the complication rates in trabeculectomies. Direct and diffuse application of MMC by injection may promote less scarring and vascularization of the bleb. To achieve the same surface area of exposure with sponges, i.e.achieved with injection, the surgeon must use multiple sponges, all of which must be carefully collected thereafter. The injection method,therefore,eliminates the risk of retained sponges. Highlights: injection of MMC may be as safe and as effective as conventional sponge application of MMC with comparable estimated complete treatment success with relatively lower complication rates

Intraoperative injection versus sponge-applied mitomycin C during trabeculectomy: One-year study

Purpose: To determine the safety and efficacy of mitomycin C (MMC) injection versus sponge during trabeculectomy. Methods: It is a prospective analysis of patients who underwent trabeculectomy with MMC and followed up for 1 year, divided into two groups, namely, group 1- injection (n = 21), group 2-> sponge (n = 21). The same concentration of MMC was used for both groups. Inclusion criteria were trabeculectomies with MMC for intraocular pressure (IOP) control in eyes with glaucoma (primary + secondary) with a follow-up of 1 year. Results: Mean preoperative IOP in group 1 was 29.00 � 11.92 mmHg and group 2 was 25.87 � 11.09 mmHg, which reduced to 12.19 � 4.03 and 15.56 � 10.72 mmHg at final visit with P value of 0.0002 and 0.001, respectively. Mean preoperative number of antiglaucoma medications was 2.4 � 0.87 in group 1 and 2.3 � 0.96 in group 2, which reduced to 0.38 � 0.5 and 0.91 � 0.85 with P value of 0.001 and 0.0003, respectively. The complete success rate was 52.4% in the injection group and 26.1% in the sponge group at end of 1 year. Overall, success rate (complete + qualified) was 90.5% and 87% in group 1 and group 2 at final visit. All major complications were encountered in sponge group. 1 (11.1%) patient developed choroidal detachment and one had malignant glaucoma which got resolved by medical management. 33.3% cases had encapsulated bleb which received bleb needling. 44.4% cases underwent Argon laser suture lysis postoperatively. Conclusion: The MMC injection may be as safe and as effective as conventional sponge application with comparable estimated complete treatment success.