Large Variation in Clinical Practice amongst Pediatricians in Treating Children with Recurrent Abdominal Pain / 대한소아소화기영양학회지

PURPOSE: To evaluate intra- and inter-observer variability and guideline adherence amongst pediatricians in treating children aged between 4 and 18 years referred with recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) without red flags. METHODS: The first part of the study is a retrospective single-center cohort study. The diagnostic work-ups of eight pediatricians were compared to the national guidelines. Intra- and inter-observer variability were examined by Cramer's V test. Intra-observer variability was defined as the amount of variation within a pediatrician and inter-observer variability as the amount of variation between pediatricians in the application of diagnostic work-up in children with RAP. Prospectively, the same pediatricians were requested to provide a report on their management strategy with a fictitious case to prove similarities in retrospective diagnostic work-up. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients per pediatrician were analyzed. Retrospectively, a (very) weak association between pediatricians' diagnostic work-ups was found (0.22), which implies high inter-observer variability. The association between intra-observer diagnostic was moderate (range, 0.35–0.46). The Cramer's V of 0.60 in diagnostic work-up between pediatricians in the fictitious case implied the presence of a moderately strong association and lower inter-observer variability than in the retrospective study. Adherence to the guideline was 66.8%. CONCLUSION: We found a high intra- and inter-observer variability and moderate guideline adherence in daily clinical practice amongst pediatricians in treating children with RAP in a teaching hospital.

Impedance pH Monitoring: Intra-observer and Inter-observer Agreement and Usefulness of a Rapid Analysis of Symptom Reflux Association

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Symptom reflux association analysis is especially helpful for evaluation and management of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) refractory patients. An accurate calculation requires manual editing of 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) tracings after automatic analysis. Intra- and inter-observer agreement as well as reliability of rapid editing confined to the time around symptomatic episodes are unknown. Aim of this study was to explore these topics in a prospective multicenter study. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients who were off PPI therapy underwent MII-pH recordings. After automatic analysis, their tracings were anonymized and randomized. Three experienced observers, each one trained in a different European center, independently performed manual editing of 24-hour tracings on 2 separate occasions. Values of symptom index and symptom association probability for acid and non acid reflux were transformed into binary response (i.e., positive or negative). RESULTS: Intra-observer agreement on symptom reflux association was 92.5% to 100.0% for acid and 85.0% to 97.5% for non-acid reflux. Inter-observer agreement was 100.0% for acid and 82.5% to 95.0% for non-acid reflux. Values for symptom index and symptom association probability were similar. Concordance between 24-hour and rapid (2 minutes-window before each symptomatic episode) editings for symptom reflux association occured in 39 to 40 patients (acid) and in 37 to 40 (non-acid), depending on the observer. CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and inter-observer agreement in classifying patients with or without symptom reflux association at manual editing of 24-hour tracings was high, especially for acid reflux. Classifying patients according to a rapid editing showed excellent concordance with the 24-hour one and can be adopted in clinical practice.

Variabilidad en la medición del índice acetabular / Variability in measurement of acetabular index

Introducción: La Displasia del desarrollo de la cadera (DDC) es un espectro de enfermedades que abarca desde la luxación franca de la cadera hasta la displasia acetabular leve. El screening de detección de DDC se realiza de rutina en nuestro país, mediante una radiografía de pelvis a los 3 meses. El índice acetabular medido en estas radiografías se utiliza para evaluar la cadera displásica, tanto en la presentación inicial como durante el seguimiento posterior. Objetivo: Evaluar la variabilidad tanto intra como inter observador en la medición del índice acetabular, entre profesionales médicos. Material y Métodos: Cuatro evaluadores (un cirujano-ortopédico infantil, un médico general, un pediatra y un radiólogo) realizaron la medición del índice acetabular en 100 radiografías de screening (200 caderas), en tres ocasiones, separadas por un mes cada una (600 mediciones totales). Un observador independiente evaluó la reproductibilidad en la medición. Se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación intraclase para determinar diferencias significativas. Resultados: La variabilidad intra observador fue menor que la interobservador. La variabilidad intra observador fue similar para los diferentes evaluadores, +/- 1,5°. La variabilidad inter observador fue de +/- 3,4°. Conclusiones: Demostramos una alta concordancia entre las mediciones, determinando una alta reproductibilidad del índice acetabular. El índice acetabular es un método seguro para el diagnóstico y seguimiento de displasia acetabular.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a spectrum of diseases ranging from frank dislocation of the hip to mild acetabular dysplasia. DDH screening for detection is performed routinely in our country using pelvic x-ray at 3 months of age. The radiographic measured acetabular index is used to evaluate the dysplastic hip, at initial presentation and during follow-up. Objective: Evaluation of the intra- and inter-observer variability, among medical professionals, when measuring acetabular index. Methods: Four reviewers (a children orthopedic surgeon, a general practitioner, a pediatrician and a radiologist) performed acetabular index measurement in 100 radiographs (200 hips), on three occasions, separated each by one month (600 total measurements). An independent observer evaluated the measurement reproducibility. The intra-class correlation coefficient to determine significant differences was used. Results: The intra-observer variability was less than the inter-observer variability. The intra-observer variability was similar among the different assessors, +/- 1.5 degrees. The inter-observer variability was +/- 3.4 degrees. Conclusions: A high concordance among measurements was reported, evidencing a high reproducibility of the acetabular index; this index is a reliable method for the diagnosis and follow-up of acetabular dysplasia.