Evaluation of intranasal oxygen supplementation in mules anesthetized with the combination of ketamine, butorphanol, and guaifenesin / Avaliação da suplementação intranasal de oxigênio em muares anestesiados com a associação de cetamina, butorfanol e éter gliceril guaiacólico

Hypoxemia is a major complication of field anesthesia and no studies regarding this occurrence in mules has been done. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate intranasal oxygen supplementation (IOS) in mules (Equus caballus x Equus asinus) anesthetized with ketamine/butorphanol/guaifenesin combination. For this, we used six male, adult mules (322±29kg) which underwent premedication (MPA) with 0.2mg/kg of midazolam intramuscularly after 15 minutes, 0.02mg/kg detomidine IV 5 minutes after, induction IV with combination of ketamine (2mg/mL), butorphanol (22.5mg/mL), and guaifenesin (50mg/mL) (K/B/G) until lateral decumbency. Maintenance was done with the same anesthetic combination. The animals were submitted twice to the protocol described above, 20 days apart, forming two groups. CG: MPA, induction (0.92±0.24mL/kg (mean±SD)), and maintenance (2.2±0.2mL/kg/h) without SIO; TG: MPA, induction (0.98±0.17mL/kg), and maintenance (2.3±0.4mL/kg/h) with IOS flow 40mL/kg/h. During anesthesia arterial blood was collected every 20 minutes (T0, T20, T40, and T60) for blood gas analysis. Data analyzed by ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni test. P<0.05 was considered significant. Hypoxemia of the animals in the CG in periods (59±5; 55±5; 53±7; 49±8) with lower averages than the TG (160±4, 115±34, 92±25, 81±19) was observed, demonstrating that IOS increases PaO2 avoiding the occurrence of hypoxemia.(AU)

A hipoxemia é uma das principais complicações da anestesia a campo, e em muares não existem estudos a respeito dessa ocorrência. Assim, objetivou-se avaliar a suplementação intranasal de oxigênio (SIO) em muares (Equus caballus x Equus asinus) anestesiados com cetamina/butorfanol/guaifenesina associados. Para isso, foram utilizados seis muares, macho e adultos (322±29kg), submetidos à medicação pré-anestésica (MPA) com 0,2mg/kg de midazolam por via intramuscular, após 15 minutos, 0,02mg/kg de detomidina por via intravenosa, após cinco minutos, indução com administração intravenosa da associação de cetamina (2mg/mL), butorfanol (22,5 µg/mL) e guaifenesina (50mg/mL) em solução de glicose a 5% (C/B/G) até o animal assumir o decúbito lateral. A manutenção foi realizada com a mesma associação anestésica. Os animais foram submetidos duas vezes ao protocolo descrito anteriormente, com intervalo de 20 dias, formando dois grupos experimentais. GC -MPA, indução (0,92±0,24mL/kg (média±DP)) e manutenção (2,2±0,2mL/kg/h) sem SIO; GT - MPA, indução (0,98±0,17mL/kg) e manutenção (2,3±0,4mL/kg/h) com SIO, fluxo de 40mL/kg/h. Durante a anestesia, foi colhido sangue arterial a cada 20 minutos (T0, T20, T40 e T60) para hemogasometria. Os dados foram analisados pela ANOVA, seguidos pelo teste de Bonferroni. Valores de P<0,05 foram considerados significativos. Foi observada hipoxemia (PaO2<60mmHg) dos animais no GC nos tempos avaliados (T0= 59±5; T20= 55±5; T40= 53±7; T60= 49±8), com médias menores que as do GT, (160±4; 115±34; 92±25; 81±19, respectivamente), o que demonstrou que a suplementação intranasal de oxigênio aumenta a PaO2, evitando a ocorrência de hipoxemia.

Effect of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine on pain and plasma interleukin-6 in patients undergoing hysterectomy / Efeito da lidocaína venosa intraoperatória sobre dor e interleucina-6 plasmática em pacientes submetidas a histerectomia / Efecto de la lidocaína venosa intraoperatoria sobre el dolor e interleucina-6 plasmática en pacientes sometidas a histerectomía

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Interleukin-6 is a predictor of trauma severity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of intravenous lidocaine on pain severity and plasma interleukin-6 after hysterectomy. METHOD: A prospective, randomized, comparative, double-blind study with 40 patients, aged 18-60 years. G1 received lidocaine (2 mg kg-1 h-1) or G2 received 0.9% saline solution during the operation. Anesthesia was induced with O2/isoflurane. Pain severity (T0: awake and 6, 12, 18 and 24 h), first analgesic request, and dose of morphine in 24 h were evaluated. Interleukin-6 was measured before starting surgery (T0), 5 h after the start (T5), and 24 h after the end of surgery (T24). RESULTS: There was no difference in pain severity between groups. There was a decrease in pain severity between T0 and other measurement times in G1. Time to first supplementation was greater in G2 (76.0 ± 104.4 min) than in G1 (26.7 ± 23.3 min). There was no difference in supplemental dose of morphine between G1 (23.5 ± 12.6 mg) and G2 (18.7 ± 11.3 mg). There were increased concentrations of IL-6 in both groups from T0 to T5 and T24. There was no difference in IL-6 dosage between groups. Lidocaine concentration was 856.5 ± 364.1 ng mL-1 in T5 and 30.1 ± 14.2 ng mL-1 in T24. CONCLUSION: Intravenous lidocaine (2 mg kg-1 h-1) did not reduce pain severity and plasma levels of IL-6 in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. .

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A interleucina-6 (IL-6) é preditora de intensidade no trauma. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da lidocaína por via venosa sobre a intensidade da dor e IL-6 após histerectomia. MÉTODO: O estudo foi prospectivo, randomizado, comparativo e duplo-encoberto em 40 pacientes, entre 18 e 60 anos. Foi administrada lidocaína (2 mg.kg-1.h-1) no G1 ou solução salina a 0,9% no G2 durante a operação. A anestesia foi com O2/isoflurano. Foi avaliada a intensidade da dor (T0: despertar e seis, 12, 18 e 24 horas), a primeira solicitação de analgésico, a dose de morfina nas 24 horas. A IL-6 foi medida antes do início da operação (T0), após cinco horas do início (T5) e 24 horas após o término (T24). RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença na intensidade da dor entre os grupos. Ocorreu diminuição da intensidade da dor entre T0 e os outros momentos avaliados no G1. O tempo para primeira complementação foi maior no G2 (76,0 ± 104,4 min) do que no G1 (26,7 ± 23,3 min). Não houve diferença na dose de morfina complementar entre G1 (23,5 ± 12,6 mg) e G2 (18,7 ± 11,3 mg). Houve aumento das concentrações de IL-6 em ambos os grupos de T0 para T5 e T24. Não houve diferença na dosagem de IL-6 entre os grupos. A concentração de lidocaína foi 856,5 ± 364,1 ng.mL-1 em T5 e 30,1 ± 14,2 ng.mL-1 em T24. CONCLUSÃO: A lidocaína (2 mg.kg-1.h-1) por via venosa não promoveu redução da intensidade da dor e dos níveis plasmáticos de IL-6 em pacientes submetidas a histerectomia abdominal. .

JUSTIFICACIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: La interleucina-6 (IL-6) es predictora de intensidad en el trauma. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de la lidocaína por vía venosa sobre la intensidad del dolor e IL-6 después de la histerectomía. MÉTODO: El estudio fue prospectivo, aleatorizado, comparativo y doble ciego en 40 pacientes, entre 18 y 60 años. Fue administrada lidocaína (2 mg/kg-1.h-1) en el G1 o solución salina al 0,9% en el G2 durante la operación. La anestesia fue con O2/isoflurano. Se calculó la intensidad del dolor (T0: despertar y 6, 12, 18 y 24 h), la primera solicitud de analgésico, y la dosis de morfina en las primeras 24 h. La IL-6 se midió antes del inicio de la operación (T0), después de 5 h del inicio (T5) y 24 h después de finalizada (T24). RESULTADOS: No hubo diferencia en la intensidad del dolor entre los grupos. Hubo disminución de la intensidad del dolor entre T0 y los otros momentos evaluados en el G1. El tiempo para la primera complementación fue mayor en el G2 (76 ± 104,4 min) que en el G1 (26,7 ± 23,3 min). No hubo diferencia en las dosis de morfina complementaria entre G1 (23,5 ± 12,6 mg) y G2 (18,7 ± 11,3 mg). Hubo aumento en las concentraciones de IL-6 en los 2 grupos de T0 para T5 y T24. No hubo diferencia en la dosificación de IL-6 entre los grupos. La concentración de lidocaína fue 856,5 ± 364,1 ng/ml-1 en T5 y 30,1 ± 14,2 ng/ml-1 en T24. CONCLUSIÓN: La lidocaína (2 mg/kg-1 /h-1) por vía venosa no generó reducción de la intensidad del dolor y de los niveles plasmáticos de IL-6 en pacientes sometidas a histerectomía abdominal. .

Clinical effect of intravenous iron dextran on peritoneal dialysis patients with renal anemia / 中国综合临床

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of intravenous iron dextran peritoneal dialysis patients with renal anemia.Methods Fifty cases of peritoneal dialysis patients with renal anemia in the Shenzhen Hospital of Peking University from Jan.2010 to Jun.2014 were randomly divided into control group and the observation group,and 25 cases in each group.Patients in observation group were given intravenous iron dextran at dose of 100 mg/time,and 3 times/week.Patients in control group were given ferrous succinate at dose of 200 mg/times orally,and 3 times/day.Both treatment period was eight weeks.Changes in clinical symptoms and treatment of the two groups of patients were recorded.Results Ater eight weeks treatment,the levels of hemoglobin(Hb),red blood cell count (RBC),hematocrit (Hct),reticulocyte count (Ret),total iron binding capacity(TS) and serum iron(SF) in two groups were significantly better than before treatment (P＜0.05 or P ＜0.01).The levels of Hb,RBC,Hct,Ret,TS and SF in observation group after treatment were (91.6± 13.8) g/L,(3.4± 0.4) × 109/L,0.31 ± 0.04,(1.7 ± 0.6) ％,(38.9 ± 6.7) ％ and (525.9 ± 81.4) μg/L,significantly better than those of control group((79.6 ± 13.9) g/L,(3.0±0.7) × 109/L,0.27±0.06,(1.4 ±0.6) ％,(28.1 ±8.4)％ and (377.2 ± 107.2) μg/L),and the differences were statistically significant (P ＜0.05).Total effective rate of observation group were 80％(20/25) and 76％(19/25) in the control group.The difference was not statistically significant(x2 =4.364,P＞0.05).Adverse reactions in observed group was 4％ (1/25) and 8％ (2/25) in control group (x2 =4.895,P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion The therapy of intravenous iron dextran on peritoneal dialysis patients with renal anemia can effectively improve the clinical symptoms,and supply iron for the patient.

Analysis of Adverse Drug Reactions Reported in 2008 by Our Hospital / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the adverse drug reactions(ADR) occurred in our hospital in 2008 and to promote clinical rational and safe medication.METHODS: The ADR case reports submitted by your hospital between Jan.and Dec.in 2008 were described in accordance with the standard set by State ADR Monitoring Center,evaluated about the causal relation,graded,collected and statistically analyzed.RESULTS: 50 kinds of drugs were involved in the 90 ADR cases monitored,leading the list were antibiotics which caused 48(53.33%) suspicious ADR cases,followed by hypotensive drugs and antianginal drugs which induced 11(12.22%) suspicious ADR cases and Chinese medicine preparations which induced 6(6.67%) suspicious ADR cases.The suspected ADR cases induced by intravenous route were most common,accounting for 80.00%(72 cases);lesions of skin and its appendants were most common clinical manifestations of ADR,which accounted for 42.22%(38 cases).CONCLUSION: The incidence of ADR induced by antibiotics was on the high side;therefore,great attention should be given to the rational use of antibiotics.