Differentiating irritable mood and disruptive behavior in adults

Abstract Introduction Irritability has both mood and behavioral manifestations. These frequently co-occur, and it is unclear to what extent they are dissociable domains. We used confirmatory factor analysis and external validators to investigate the independence of mood and behavioral components of irritability. Methods The sample comprised 246 patients (mean age 45 years; 63% female) from four outpatient programs (depression, anxiety, bipolar, and schizophrenia) at a tertiary hospital. A clinical instrument rated by trained clinicians was specifically designed to capture irritable mood and disruptive behavior dimensionally, as well as current categorical diagnoses i.e., intermittent explosive disorder (IED); oppositional defiant disorder (ODD); and an adaptation to diagnose disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) in adults. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the best fitting irritability models and regression analyses were used to investigate associations with external validators. Results Irritable mood and disruptive behavior were both frequent, but diagnoses of disruptive syndromes were rare (IED, 8%; ODD, 2%; DMDD, 2%). A correlated model with two dimensions, and a bifactor model with one general dimension and two specific dimensions (mood and behavior) both had good fit indices. The correlated model had root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.077, with 90% confidence interval (90%CI) = 0.071-0.083; comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.99; and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.99, while the bifactor model had RMSEA = 0.041; CFI = 0.99; and TLI = 0.99 respectively). In the bifactor model, external validity for differentiation of the mood and behavioral components of irritability was also supported by associations between irritable mood and impairment and clinical measures of depression and mania, which were not associated with disruptive behavior. Conclusions Psychometric and external validity data suggest both overlapping and specific features of the mood vs. disruptive behavior dimensions of irritability.

Llanto excesivo en los primeros meses de vida: Revisión / Excessive crying in infants in the first months of life: Review

El comportamiento caracterizado por llanto e irritabilidad, una de las presentaciones clínicas más frecuentes en los primeros meses de vida, surge de una compleja interacción de factores culturales, psicosociales, ambientales y biológicos. El 5% de los casos presenta alguna afección orgánica. Un enfoque holístico de tipo biopsicosocial del problema parece ser el más conveniente. El presente manuscrito examina la evidencia reciente con el propósito de actualizar el manejo clínico de esta afección e intentar redefinirla.

Cry-fuss problems are among the most common clinical presentations in the first few months of life. Cry-fuss behaviour emerges out of a complex interplay of cultural, psychosocial, environmental and biologic factors, with organic disturbance implicated in only 5% of cases. A holistic biopsychosocial approach can be most effective. This article reviews recent evidence to update clinical management, and will attempt to reconceptualize infant colic definition.

Refinando o diagnóstico de Transtorno de Oposição e Desafio na infância e adolescência: validação e caracterização da dimensão irritável / Refining Oppositional Defiant Disorder diagnosis in children and adolescents: validation and characterization of the irritable dimension

O Transtorno de Oposição e Desafio (TOD) é definido por um padrão recorrente de comportamento desafiante, desobediente e hostil com início na infância e adolescência e caracteriza-se por uma alta taxa de comorbidades. Estudos longitudinais apontam o TOD na infância como um dos principais preditores de psicopatologia na idade adulta. Uma possível explicação para a grande heterogeneidade de comorbidades e trajetórias longitudinais é de que o diagnóstico de TOD abrange distintas dimensões de sintomas, cada qual com seu desfecho. O primeiro objetivo desta tese foi a validação das distintas dimensões do TOD em uma amostra comunitária Brasileira composta de 2512 sujeitos. Através de análise fatorial confirmatória, demonstramos que o modelo que melhor representa a heterogeneidade do TOD é composto por três dimensões: a dimensão "argumentative/defiant" que está associada com transtorno de déficit de atenção/hiperatividade (TDAH); a dimensão "vindictiveness" que possui associação com transtorno de conduta (TC); e a dimensão "angry/irritable mood" onde predominam as associações com transtornos depressivos e de ansiedade. O objetivo seguinte foi investigar o papel da dimensão irritável na classificação nosológica dos transtornos mentais na infância e adolescência. A apresentação da irritabilidade é um aspecto crucial: irritabilidade crônica caracterizada por baixa tolerância à frustração e frequentes explosões de raiva, que é distinta da apresentação episódica, associada ao diagnóstico Transtorno de Humor Bipolar (TB). "Severe mood dysregulation", "disruptive mood dysregulation disorder", ou dimensão irritável do TOD são formas distintas de classificar o fenótipo de irritabilidade crônica. Entretanto, independente da classificação utilizada, a alta taxa de comorbidades é invariavelmente o denominador comum em estudos sobre irritabilidade. Neste sentido, examinamos o impacto da irritabilidade como uma dimensão subjacente a vários transtornos. Para tanto, avaliamos o...

The Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) is defined as a pattern of disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior beginning in childhood or adolescence and often accompanied by a wide range of comorbidities. Longitudinal studies support ODD as a predictor of psychopathology in adulthood. A potential explanation for such heterogeneity of comorbidities and longitudinal trajectories is that ODD diagnosis encompasses distinct clusters of symptoms, each with its outcome. The first aim of this work was the validation of ODD dimensions in a Brazilian community sample of 2512 subjects. Confirmatory factorial analysis showed that the best model for ODD comprised three dimensions: an "argumentative/defiant" dimension, which associates with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); a "vindictiveness" dimension, which associates with conduct disorder (CD); and an "angry/irritable" dimension where emotional disorders such as depression and anxiety are the most common associations. The next step was the investigation of the role of the irritable dimension of oppositionality in diagnostic classifications of childhood mental disorders. The pattern of irritability is a crucial point: its chronic presentation as easy annoyance and frequent temper outbursts should be differentiated from the episodic course of irritability associated with the specific diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder (BD). "Severe mood dysregulation", "disruptive mood dysregulation disorder", and the irritable dimension of oppositionality are different ways to classify the chronic irritability phenotype. However, regardless of the classification, the high rate of comorbidities is invariably the common denominator in studies of irritability. Therefore, we examined the impact of irritability as a dimension cutting across multiple settings: individuals without any diagnosis, subjects with ADHD, and also those with emotional disorders. For that we used two samples, one from Brazil, with 2.512 subjects, and one...