Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy / 中华肿瘤杂志

Objective: To compare and analyze the perioperative clinical effects of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIE-Ivor-Lewis) and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE-McKeown). Methods: A total of 147 patients who underwent endoscopic esophageal cancer surgery from April 2018 to August 2019 were selected, including 85 patients undergoing MIE-McKeown surgery and 62 patients undergoing MIE-Ivor-Lewis surgery. The measurement data were expressed as (x±s), the comparison of normally distributed measurement data was performed by independent sample t-test, and the comparison of count data was performed by χ(2) test or Fisher's exact test. Results: The operation time of McKeown (M) group and Ivor-Lewis (IL) group were (219.2±72.4) minutes and (225.8±65.3) minutes. The mediastinal lymph node dissection number of M and IL groups were 13.3±4.8 and 11.6±6.5, respectively. The number of left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection were 3.5±1.2 and 3.1±1.4, respectively. The intraoperative blood loss were (178.3±41.3) ml and (163.2±64.1) ml, respectively. The number of patients reoperated for postoperative bleeding were 1 and 0, respectively. The number of patients with postoperative gastric bleeding were 0 and 1, respectively. The postoperative chest tube retention time were (2.8±1.3) days and (3.1±1.2) days, respectively. The number of patients with anastomotic leakage were 7 and 1, respectively. The number of patients with lung infection were 13 and 5, respectively, and with chylothorax were 2 and 1, respectively, without statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The number of patients with hoarseness were 11 and 3, respectively. The total incidence of complication were 41.2% (35/85) and 17.7% (11/62), and the postoperative hospital stay were (14.7±6.5) days and (12.3±2.3) days, with statistical difference (P<0.05). Conclusion: MIE-Ivor-Lewis and MIE-McKeown are safe and effective in treating esophageal cancer, but the complication of MIE-Ivor-Lewis is less than that of MIE-Mckeown, and the perioperative clinical effect of MIE-Ivor-Lewis is better than that of MIE-McKeown.

Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer / 中南大学学报(医学版)

Objective:To summarize the outcomes of 74 patients with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE-McKeown),and to discuss the short-term outcomes by comparing with IvorLewis esophagectomy (ILE) procedure.Methods:A total of 74 patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent MIE-McKeown in Xiangya Hospital from November 2014 to July 2016 were retrospectively reviewed,and 85 patients underwent ILE procedure were selected as a control group.Perioperative and short-term outcomes were analyzed.Results:Compared with the ILE group,patients underwent MIE-McKeown had less blood loss,less pulmonary infection,longer resection length and more harvested lymph nodes (P＜0.05),but they had more anastomotic leakage and stricture rate,longer operation time and hospital stay as well (P＜0.05).The total rate of lymph node metastatic in all patients was 52.8％,and the rate of cervical lymph node metastases was 9.5％ in the MIE-McKeown group.Multiple carcinomas were found in 16 cases,and 7 were proximally located.The distance from the distal margin of the second lesion to the center of the main lesion was 20-85 (50.7±23.0) mm,while the distance in 9 second carcinomas distally located was 30-90 (57.8±20.5) mm.Conclusion:Compared with Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy procedure,MIE-McKeown procedure has a more complete lesion dissection and more harvested lymph nodes with smaller incisions,better short-term outcomes and more safety.It is an appropriate procedure for esophagectomy.However,it should be optimized for its high rate of anastomotic leakage and stricture.

Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy without an abdominal small incision / 国际外科学杂志

Objective To investigate the feasibility and clinical effect of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy without an abdominal small incision.Methods Compared 80 cases underwent laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy without an abdominal small incision with 68 patients receivesd laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with an abdominal small incision.The peri operative conditions and complications of the two groups were analyzed.Results There were no significant difference in the operation time [(263.3 ± 71.5) min vs (273.3 ± 73.7) min,t =-0.750,P =0.454],intraoperative blood loss [(246.9 ± 150.4) ml vs (252.9 ± 159.7) ml,t =-0.238,P =0.812],the number of lymph node dissection [(19.2 ±4.3) vs (19 ±4.5),t =0.272,P =0.786],gastrointestinal decompression time [(11 ± 3.4) d vs (11.9±3.3) d,t=-1.647,P=0.102],chest tube indwelling time [(6.6±2.7) d vs (6.3±2.6) d,t=0.544,P=0.587],postoperative hospitalization time [(13.2 ±3.4) d vs (14 ±3.4) d,t=-1.493,P=0.138] and rate of early gastric emptying dysfunction [6.25％ (5/80) vs 4.41％ (3/68),x2 =0.016,P =0.898].Comparing to patients in the small incision group,the visual analogue scale evaluation score of postoperative pain was lower in the groups without small incision (P ＜ 0.05).There were no anastomotic fistula,thoracic gastric fistula,upper gastrointestinal bleeding and death during perioperative periods.Conclusion It is safe and feasible to treat middle and lower esophageal carcinoma with laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy without an abdominal small incision,which can further reduce abdominal trauma,relieve postoperative pain and make the abdominal incision more beautiful.

Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy using a circular-stapled anastomosis with trans-oral anvil: 30 cases report / 中华胸心血管外科杂志

Objective To explore the feasibility and short-term efficacy of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy using a circular-stapled anastomosis with trans-oral anvil in treating esophageal carcinoma.Methods 30 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer received minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy from January 2011 to December 2011.Operations of all the cases comprised of both abdominal and thoracic procedures which were performed with Iaparoscopic and thoracoscopic techniques respectively.The intrathoracic esophago-gastric anastomosis was created using a circular-stapled anastomosis with trans-oral anvil technique.Results There were 24 males and 6 female with median age of 62.5-year-old (from 47 to 82).The lesions located in middle and/or lower portion of the esophagus.25 patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (n =25) and 5 patients with adenocarcinoma (n =5) underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.All the operations were successfully performed without intra-operative technical failures of the anastomosis or deaths.The mean operation time was 95 minutes in abdomen and 177 minutes in thorax.The mean blood loss was 310 ml.The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 10.6 from thorax and 4.9 from abdomen.Postoperalively,there were thoracic wound infections in 4 patients.One patient had a left diaphragmatic hernia and was successfully treated by re-operation 6 days after first operation.One patient had chylothorax and recovered without surgery.There was no anastomotic leak and the patients were able to have spoon meat at 5.6 postoperative days.Conclusion Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy can be accomplished smoothly with acceptable occurrence of complications.The circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil is an efficient,safe and reproducible technique for intrathoracic esophago-gastric anastomosis.