Profile and patterns of dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes among Mexican adults / Perfil y patrones de uso dual de cigarrillos electrónicos y cigarrillos combustibles en adultos mexicanos

Abstract: Objective: To describe the profile and patterns of dual uses (n=954) and exclusive cigarette users (n=2 070) and determine the correlates of more frequent e-cigarette use among dual users and their reasons for e-cigarette use. Materials and methods: An online survey of Mexican adult smokers. Logistic models regressed dual-use (exclusive smoking vs. dual user) on sociodemographic, smoking variables and substance use behaviors. We conducted censorial binomial models to estimate the correlates of frequency of e-cigarette use among dual users. Results: Dual users were younger had higher education (AOR=2.22) and higher levels of smoking dependence (AOR=1.31), preferred cigarettes with flavor capsules (AOR=1.58) and had recently attempted to quit smoking (AOR=1.38). Marijuana use and being daily smokers were correlates of higher frequency of use among dual users. Conclusion: Dual users had a higher risk profile than exclusive smokers, which was even more prominent in dual-users who used e-cigarettes frequently.

Resumen: Objetivo: Describir el perfil de los usuarios duales y fumadores exclusivos, así como los factores asociados con la frecuencia de uso de cigarro electrónico. Material y métodos: Se realizaron modelos logísticos de una encuesta en línea de fumadores adultos para estimar asociaciones de usuarios duales (fumador exclusivo vs. usuario dual) sobre variables sociodemográficas, tabaquismo y otras sustancias. Adicionalmente, mediante modelos binomiales censurados se evaluaron los factores asociados con la frecuencia de consumo de cigarro electrónico. Resultados: Los usuarios duales fueron más jóvenes, con mayor educación (AOR=2.22), tenían mayores niveles de dependencia de tabaquismo (AOR=1.31), preferirían usar cigarros con cápsulas de sabor (AOR=1.58) y tuvieron una mayor proporción de intentos de dejar de fumar (AOR=1.38). El consumo de marihuana y fumar diario se asoció con una mayor frecuencia de consumo de cigarro electrónico. Conclusión: El uso dual se asoció con un perfil de riesgo más alto; este perfil es más prominente en usuarios duales que usan cigarros electrónicos con mayor frecuencia.

Rapid assessment of institutional research ethics capacity: a case study from Zambia / Evaluación rápida de la capacidad institucional de investigación ética: un estudio de caso en Zambia / Avaliação rápida da capacidade institucional de ética em pesquisa: um estudo de caso na Zâmbia

Abstract: Recently, there has been a remarkable increase in biomedical research being conducted in low and middle-income countries. This increase has brought attention to the need for high quality research ethics systems within these countries and a greater focus on research ethics training. Though most programs tend to concentrate on training individuals, less attention has focused on institutions as the target of such training. In this paper we demonstrate a rapid approach to evaluating institutional research capacity. The method adapts the Octagon Model, which evaluates institutional research ethics using eight domains: basic values and identity, organization of activities, implementation, relevance, proper skills, financing and administration, target groups, and working environment. The framework was applied to the University of Zambia in order to conduct a baseline assessment of university research ethics capacity. Internal and external assessments were conducted. The domains of working environment and proper skills scored highest, while relevance, target groups and identity scored lower. Consistent with previous work, a systems approach to evaluating institutional research development capacity can provide a rapid assessment of an institutional bioethics program. This case study reveals the strengths and weaknesses of the university's research ethics program and provides a framework for future capacity growth.

Resumen: Recientemente, ha habido un notable aumento en la investigación biomédica en países de ingresos bajos y medianos. Este aumento ha llamado la atención sobre la necesidad de sistemas éticos de investigación de alta calidad en estos países y un mayor enfoque en la formación en ética de la investigación. Aunque la mayoría de los programas tienden a concentrarse en la formación de los individuos, menos atención se ha centrado en las instituciones como objetivo de dicha formación. En este trabajo se demuestra un enfoque rápido para evaluar la capacidad de investigación institucional. El método adapta el modelo Octagon, que evalúa la ética institucional de la investigación utilizando ocho dominios: valores básicos e identidad, organización de actividades, implementación, relevancia, habilidades adecuadas, financiamiento y administración, grupos objetivo y ambiente de trabajo. El marco se aplicó a la Universidad de Zambia, con el fin de realizar una evaluación inicial de la capacidad de ética de la investigación universitaria. Se realizaron evaluaciones internas y externas. Los ámbitos del entorno de trabajo y de las competencias apropiadas obtuvieron el puntaje más alto, mientras que la relevancia, los grupos objetivo y la identidad obtuvieron calificaciones más bajas. De acuerdo con trabajos previos, un enfoque sistémico para evaluar la capacidad de desarrollo institucional de la investigación puede proporcionar una evaluación rápida de un programa institucional de bioética. Este estudio de caso revela las fortalezas y debilidades del programa de ética de la investigación de la universidad y proporciona un marco para el futuro crecimiento de la capacidad.

Resumo: Recentemente, tem havido um notável aumento na investigação biomédica em países de renda baixa e média. Este aumento tem chamado a atenção para a necessidade de sistemas éticos de pesquisa de alta qualidade nesses países e um maior foco na formação em ética em pesquisa. Embora a maioria dos programas tende a se concentrar na formação dos indivíduos, menos atenção centrou-se em instituições como objetivo dessa formação. Este trabalho demonstra uma aproximação rápida para avaliar a capacidade de pesquisa institucional. O método adapta o modelo Octagon, que avalia a ética institucional de pesquisa usando oito domínios: valores básicos e identidade, organização das atividades, implementação, pertinência, competências adequadas, financiamento e administração, os grupos-alvo e ambiente de trabalho. O quadro foi aplicado para a Universidade da Zâmbia, a fim de fazer uma primeira avaliação da capacidade de ética em pesquisa universitária. Foram realizadas avaliações internas e externas. Os campos do ambiente trabalho e competências adequadas, obtiveram a maior pontuação, enquanto a relevância, grupos-alvo e identidade obtiveram qualificações inferiores. De acordo com trabalhos anteriores, uma abordagem sistêmica para avaliar a capacidade dedesenvolvimento institucional de pesquisa pode fornecer uma avaliação rápida de um programa institucional de bioética. Este estudo de caso revela os pontos fortes e pontos fracos do programa de ética em pesquisa da Universidade e fornece uma estrutura para o crescimento futuro da capacidade.

Streamlining Pediatric Emergency Medicine at a Tertiary-care Hospital of a Low- to Middle-income Country.

The factors of integral importance to run any pediatric emergency department efficiently are the ability to process a high volume of patients quickly and a sensitive triage system that identifies the sickest children. Achieving these aims in a low- to middle-income country setting is more complex as a result of scarce resources and data on which to base systems. In this article, we discuss existing models of streamlining pediatric emergency department services that are most applicable to resource-limited countries, and present suggestions for streamlining pediatric emergency care in such countries.

Developmental Screening Tools: Feasibility of Use at Primary Healthcare Level in Low- and Middle-income Settings.

An estimated 150 million children have a disability. Early identification of developmental disabilities is a high priority for the World Health Organization to allow action to reduce impairments through Gap Action Program on mental health. The study identified the feasibility of using the developmental screening and monitoring tools for children aged 0-3 year(s) by non-specialist primary healthcare providers in low-resource settings. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify the tools, assess their psychometric properties, and feasibility of use in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Key indicators to examine feasibility in LMICs were derived from a consultation with 23 international experts. We identified 426 studies from which 14 tools used in LMICs were extracted for further examination. Three tools reported adequate psychometric properties and met most of the feasibility criteria. Three tools appear promising for use in identifying and monitoring young children with disabilities at primary healthcare level in LMICs. Further research and development are needed to optimize these tools.