RESUMO
Objective@#To evaluate the value of laser Doppler imaging (LDI) in diagnosing deep or superficial partial-thickness burn wound with meta-analysis.@*Methods@#Databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library were searched using key words " burn, burns, burn depth, laser Doppler imaging, laser Doppler perfusion imaging, LDI, LDPI" , and Chinese Journals Full-text Database, Wanfang Database, VIP Database were searched using Chinese key words "烧伤,烧伤深度,激光多普勒,激光多普勒血流灌注成像,激光多普勒成像仪" to obtain the published trials of LDI in diagnosing deep or superficial partial-thickness burn wound from the establishment of each database to October 2015. The risk of bias and applicability concerns of the included studies were evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Data were processed with Meta-DiSc 1.4 statistical software. The heterogeneity among the included studies was evaluated. The pooled estimates of LDI in diagnosing deep or superficial partial-thickness burn wound in the included studies, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, as well as the area under the curve of summary receiver operating characteristic and index of Q* were calculated. The stability of results of the overall pooled estimates of the included studies was validated by sensitivity analysis. The sources of heterogeneity among the included studies were sought through subgroup analysis. The publication bias caused by the results of the included studies was evaluated by drawing the Deek′s funnel plot.@*Results@#A total of 5 articles conforming to the inclusion criteria, involving 138 patients and 179 burn wounds, were included. One of the included studies had low risk of bias, while the other 4 studies had high/unclear risk of bias. In applicability concern aspect, one of the included studies had high/unclear concerns regarding applicability, while the other 4 studies had low concerns regarding applicability. There was no heterogeneity caused by threshold effects among the included studies (no " shoulder arm" plot of the scattered-point distribution was observed in the space of the receiver operating characteristic, βs=0.01, P>0.05). There was a high heterogeneity caused by non-threshold effects among the included studies (sensitivity I2=54%). The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of the included studies on LDI in diagnosing deep or superficial partial-thickness burn wound were 95% (with 95% confidence interval 88%-99%), 96% (with 95% confidence interval 90%-99%), 9.75 (with 95% confidence interval 4.35-21.81), 0.11 (with 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.22), and 257.93 (with 95% confidence interval 58.96-1 128.41), respectively. The area under the curve of summary receiver operating characteristic was 0.98, with index of Q* 94%. The results of the overall pooled estimates of the included studies was stable. The risk of bias of the selection of the patients, equipment type of LDI, and the selection of diagnostic method in control might be sources of the heterogeneity of the included studies. The Deek′s funnel plot indicated that there was no publication bias caused by the results of the included studies (P>0.05).@*Conclusions@#LDI has high sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and index of Q*, large area under the curve of summary receiver operating characteristics, and low negative likelihood ratio in diagnosing deep or superficial partial-thickness burn wound, which has relatively high diagnostic value.
RESUMO
OBJETIVO: Determinar o comportamento dinâmico do fluxo sanguíneo da microcirculação digital, antes e após dois estímulos frios (EF) de diferentes intensidades, utilizando o método do Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI) em pacientes com esclerose sistêmica (ES) e controles saudáveis. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos 14 pacientes com ES (51,2 ± 5,5 anos de idade) e 12 controles saudáveis (44,8 ± 9,9 anos). Foram realizados dois protocolos alternativos de EF (submersão das mãos em água a 10 ºC ou 15 ºC, durante 1 minuto). O fluxo médio das quatro polpas digitais da mão esquerda (FPD) foi mensurado com a utilização do LDI (Moor LDI-VR), em condições basais, nos períodos de 1, 4, 10, 25 e 40 minutos após EF. RESULTADOS: O fluxo basal foi significativamente menor em ambos os protocolos em pacientes com ES comparados a controles (312,9 ± 102,7 versus 465,4 ± 135,4 PU, P = 0,006, no protocolo a 15 ºC; 305,2 ± 121,0 versus 437,9 ± 119,8 PU, P = 0,01, no protocolo a 10 ºC). Nos controles houve declínio significativo do FPD após EF, em comparação aos valores basais apenas no tempo de um minuto após EF a 15 ºC (P = 0,001) e nos tempos de 1 e 25 minutos após EF a 10 ºC (P = 0,005; P = 0,001, respectivamente). Nos pacientes com ES, houve declínio significativo do FPD nos tempos de 1, 4 e 10 minutos após ambos EFs (P < 0,000; P = 0,002; P = 0,014, EF a 15 ºC; P < 0,000; P = 0,004; P = 0,001, EF a 10 ºC, respectivamente). CONCLUSÃO: LDI demonstrou baixa perfusão em polpa digital em condições basais e elevado declínio de perfusão com retardo na recuperação após EF na ES. A quantificação do fluxo sanguíneo pelo LDI pode ser útil para o seguimento longitudinal da doença e para a monitoração de intervenções terapêuticas na ES.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate the dynamic behavior of the blood flow of the microvascular circulation of the fingertips before and after two cold stimuli (CS), using Laser Doppler Imaging with different intensities in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and in healthy individuals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen SSc patients (51.2 ± 5.5 years) with Raynaud's phenomenon and 12 healthy controls (44.8 ± 9.0 years) were included in this study. Two CS protocols (submersion of the hands in water at 10 ºC or 15 ºC for 1 minute) were performed on the same day. Mean fingertip blood flow (FBF) of four digits of the left hand was measured using LDI (Moor LDI-VR, Moor Instruments) at baseline and at 1, 4, 10, 25, and 40 minutes after CS. RESULTS: Baseline blood flow was significantly lower in both CS protocols in SSc patients when compared to controls (312.9 ± 102.7 vs 465.4 ± 135.4 PU, P = 0.006 at 15 ºC; 305.2 ± 121.0 vs 437.9 ± 119.8 PU; P = 0.01 at 10 ºC). In the control group, a significant decrease in FBF after CS, when compared to baseline, was observed 1 minute (P = 0.001) after CS at 15 ºC and at 1 (P = 0.005) and 25 minutes (P = 0.001) after CS at 10 ºC. In SSc patients, a significant decrease in FBF was observed in both CS protocols at 1, 4, and 10 minutes (P < 0.000; P = 0.002; P = 0.014, after CS at 15 ºC; P < 0.000; P = 0.004; P = 0.001, after CS at 10 ºC). CONCLUSIONS: Laser Doppler Imaging showed lower baseline fingertip perfusion and further reduction after CS in SSc patients compared to controls. Quantification of fingertip blood flow by LDI may be useful in the longitudinal monitoring of the disease status and therapeutic interventions in SSc.