Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 1585-1590, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-817103

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To provide reference for pharmaceutical enterprises to enhance the R&D capability and improve the R&D investment strategy. METHODS: The annual report data of 13 listed pharmaceutical enterprises in southwest China were collcted. Taking fixed assets, operating costs, the number of employees in service and the amount of R&D investment as input indicators, net profit, operating income and earnings per share as output indicators, the efficiency values were calculated by using MyDEA 1.0 software based on super-efficiency DEA model. The operating efficiency of enterprises with or without R&D input were compared; the contribution rate of R&D investment to enterprises were calculated. Finally, Wilcoxon symbolic rank test was carried out by using SPSS 20.0 software to compare the difference. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2015, 10 of the 13 listed pharmaceutical enterprises had increased their R&D investment, which indicated that listed pharmaceutical enterprises in southwest China paid more attention to R&D investment. For three consecutive years, the efficiency value of R&D investment of the 13 listed pharmaceutical enterprises was significantly higher than that of the enterprises without R&D investment, and the number of the former reaching DEA efficiency was more, indicating that R&D investment was positively correlated with the operational efficiency of pharmaceutical enterprises. The Wilcoxon symbol rank test also confirmed that R&D investment was an effect input. After three enterprises joined the R&D input index, their operational efficiency was improved, and their R&D contribution was greater. Five enterprises had zero R&D contribution, their efficiency value remained unchanged whether or not they joined R&D input. The R&D contribution of other listed pharmaceutical enterprises varied greatly in each year. CONCLUSIONS: At the overall level of the industry, enterprises should increase their R&D investment and pay attention to improving R&D efficiency, establish a sound R&D innovation system and R&D personnel training mechanism, establish an integrated training mode of production, learning and research; the government should create an environment to support R&D activities of pharmaceutical enterprises. For individual enterprises, different strategies should be adopted based on practical situation in order to improve the pulling effect of R&D input on the operational efficiency of enterprises.

2.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 4753-4755,4756, 2015.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-605249

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE:To investigate the profitability of listed pharmaceutical enterprises in China,and to investigate the ba-sic profitability path. METHODS:With the help of DuPont financial analysis system,the financial data of the listed companies and other manufacturing industry during 2007-2013 were collected and compared in terms of the return on equity(ROE),profit margin (PM),asset turnover (ATO) and equity multiplier (EM),etc. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS:During 2007-2013,average ROE and PM of listed pharmaceutical companies both were higher than those of other manufacturing industry(10.00% vs. 6.40%, 11.50% vs. 6.49%);while average ATO and EM were lower than other manufacturing industry (0.65 vs. 0.73,1.90 vs. 2.19), with statistical significance(P<0.05). It has advantages in core earnings and product profitability while disadvantage in asset turn-over and financial leverage for the listed pharmaceutical companies. Listed pharmaceutical companies’gross margin was higher (42.87% vs. 22.07%),but was offset by the higher ratio of expenses to sales(18.24% vs. 5.61%)and insufficient utilization ratio of circulating assets. To change this situation,listed pharmaceutical enterprises should focus on circulation cost saving and the im-provement of assets operation ability,especially enhancing the utilization ratio of current assets.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA