RESUMO
Objective:To evaluate narrow band imaging-magnifying endoscopy (NBI-ME) for the further assessment of lesions of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) in the gastric biopsy.Methods:Data of 180 patients who underwent NBI-ME before endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for biopsy of gastric LGIN at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2017 to October 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Taking the pathological results after ESD as the gold standard, the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value, and the accuracy of NBI-ME in predicting the pathological upgrading of gastric LGIN lesions after ESD were calculated, and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn.Results:Among 180 gastric LGIN lesions, 115 (63.89%) were pathological upgraded and 65 (36.11%) were not after ESD. There were 10 missed diagnoses, 19 misdiagnoses, and 151 correct diagnoses in NBI-ME examination before ESD. The sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value, and the accuracy of NBI-ME in predicting the pathological upgrading of gastric LGIN lesions after ESD were 91.3% (105/115), 70.8% (46/65), 84.7% (105/124), 82.1%(46/56) and 83.9% (151/180), respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.810 (95% CI: 0.737-0.883). Conclusion:Further NBI-ME examination of gastric LGIN lesions diagnosed by biopsy pathology can accurately predict whether the lesions have pathological upgrading after ESD, which is of important guiding significance for the patients to choose the treatment strategy of further follow-up or endoscopic resection.
RESUMO
Background: There are limitations in diagnosis based on common white light endoscopy (C-WLE) and guided forcep biopsy, which may lead to missing or misdiagnosis of early cancer. Aims: To evaluate the value of endoscopic fine examination for early cancer screening in patients with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN). Methods: Fifty patients with gastric LGIN diagnosed by C-WLE-based pathology from Aug. 2016 to Feb. 2019 at Changzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were enrolled. All the patients were reexamined three months later, of them 30 patients with typical morphological changes of Ⅱa, Ⅱc and Ⅱa+Ⅱc underwent endoscopic fine examination with magnifying endoscopy and narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) for screening of early cancer. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was also performed. Results: According to VS classification, 15 of the 30 patients having endoscopic fine examination performed were diagnosed as early cancer and the other 15 were diagnosed as non-cancerous lesions. Pathology based on biopsy under endoscopic fine examination revealed 10 high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN)/gastric cancer and 20 LGIN/chronic inflammation. Pathology based on ESD revealed 14 HGIN/gastric cancer and 16 LGIN/chronic inflammation. Taken ESD pathology as the gold standard, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of endoscopic fine examination for diagnosis of early gastric cancer both were 100%, significantly higher than those of C-WLE- and ME-NBI-biopsy pathology (P<0.05). Conclusions: Endoscopic fine examination with ME-NBI can improve the detection of early cancer and prevent missing diagnosis in patients with gastric LGIN indicated by C-WLE-biopsy.
RESUMO
Gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) is a precancerous lesion of the stomach. It commonly occurs in antrum and lack of typical clinical symptoms. Follow-up or endoscopic intervention are the main modalities in its clinical management. In recent years, with the development of endoscopy technology and the deepening of clinical research, progress has been made in diagnosis and management of LGIN. However, there is no consensus on management of LGIN and the forceps biopsy pathology may lead to underestimation of the lesion. This article reviewed the progress in research on diagnosis and management of gastric LGIN.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the risk factors of pathological discrepancy between biopsy and excisional specimen from gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and early gastric cancer (EGC). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 235 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgical resection and diagnosed as LGIN or EGC ( including high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia) by postoperative pathology. Patients were grouped by whether there was significant pathological discrepancy between biopsy and excisional specimen. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze the risk factors for significant pathological discrepancy. Results Significant pathological discrepancy occurred in 33 cases (14. 0%). Univariate analysis showed that protruding lesion, non-reddish surface, without erosion or ulcer, diffused pathological type and number of biopsy were related to the pathological discrepancy (all P＜0. 05). Multivariate analysis suggested that small number of biopsy blocks (OR＝0. 574, 95%CI: 0. 363-0. 908, P＝0. 018) was an independent risk factor for significant pathological discrepancy. Conclusion The pathological discrepancy between biopsy and excisional specimen from gastric LGIN and EGC are common. Multiple biopsies can improve the accuracy of biopsy and reduce the occurrence of pathological discrepancy with excisional specimen.
RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the clinical control role of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging plus forceps biopsy for gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia detected by normalendoscopic biopsy. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 142 patients between January 2012 to December 2017, who were diagnosed as gastric LGIN by forceps biopsy in the first endoscopy examination and followed up by endoscopic surveillance. All the cases received endoscopic submucosal dissection or operation. One hundred and forty-two patients were divided into three groups according to different methods used to reexamine, including conventional white-light imaging (C-WLI) plus biopsy group, magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) group and magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) plus biopsy group. The consistent rate between the endoscopic-reexamined diagnosis and the pathologic diagnosis after ESD or operation in the three groups were compared. According to the pathologic diagnosis after ESD or operation, they were divided into two groups:the non-cancer group and the cancer group, the clinic and endoscopic characteristics between the non-cancer group and the cancer group were analyzed. Results The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV were significantly higher in ME-NBI group than those in C-WLI plus biopsy group and ME-NBI plus biopsy group:94.59％vs. 86.76％and 81.08％, 85.71％vs. 62.50％and 75.00％, 100.00％vs. 100.00％and 84.78％, 100.00％vs. 100.00％and 75.00％, 92.00％vs. 83.02％and 86.27％. As for the clinic and endoscopic characteristics, there was no statistically significant difference between the non-cancer group and the cancer group with age of patients, gender of patients, location of lesions, gastric mucosal atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and H.pylori infections (P>0.05). There was statistically significant difference with the size>1 cm, redness, nodularity and depression between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusions Using the method of ME-NBI plus biopsy, actual high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or early carcinoma can be differentiated from low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia so that treatment can be performed without delay.For the lesions of the size>1 cm, redness, nodularity and depression, they need to be reexamized as quickly as possible by the method of ME-NBI plus biopsy.
RESUMO
Objective To study the influencing factors for outcomes of gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia ( LGIN) for better LGIN treatment regimen. Methods Using magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging ( ME-NBI ) follow-up strategy, the endoscopic features of 47 cases of LGIN in Fujian Provincial Hospital, including location, size, surface situation, demarcation line, microvascular pattern and microsurface pattern, were prospectively observed, then the factors influencing the outcome were analyzed. Results Among the 47 cases of LGIN, there were 35 cases in stable condition, whose results of biopsy and ME-NBI had no changes (stable LGIN), and the mean follow-up time was 20. 7±6. 9 months. The remaining 12 patients had progressive dysplasia (progressive LGIN), including 4 cases of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and 8 cases of moderate dysplasia. The mean follow-up time was 16. 3 ± 11. 8 months. There were no significant differences between the two groups in gender (P=0. 33), mean age (P=0. 13), lesion distribution (P=0. 70), and lesion morphology (P=0. 97). The lesion size was less than 20 mm in the stable group ( 71. 4％, 25/35) , and over 20 mm in the progressive group ( 66. 7％, 8/12) , and the difference was statistically significant ( P=0. 02) . The proportion of the lesion surface heterogeneity in the progressive group was significantly higher than that in the stable group[75. 0％ (9/12) VS 34. 3％ (12/35),P= 0. 01 ] . The proportion of positive manifestations under ME-NBI in the progressive group was also significantly higher than that in the stable group [ 83. 3％ ( 10/12 ) VS 8. 6％ ( 3/35 ) , P = 0. 00 ] . Conclusion The size of lesions over 20 mm, the uneven surface and positive ME-NBI are the important factors influencing the outcome of LGIN, which are of significance for the diagnosis and treatment of LGIN.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the risk factors of pathological upgrading in gastric mucosal lesions with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).Methods From January 2010 to December 2016,the complete clinical data of 326 patients pathologically diagnosed with gastric LGIN lesions before ESD were retrospectively analyzed.Single factor analysis of variance and multiple factor Logistic regression analysis were performed to analyze the risk factors of pathological upgrading after ESD.Results A total of 326 patients with gastric LGIN lesions diagnosed by preoperative biopsy before ESD were enrolled.Among them the postoperative pathological diagnosis of 244 cases (74.85％) were still LGIN,while the postoperative pathological diagnosis of 82 cases (25.15 ％) were upgraded,of which 61 cases (18.71％) were upgraded to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and 21 (6.44％) were upgraded to gastric early cancer.The results of single and multiple factor analysis indicated that lesion size≥2.0 cm,deep depressed-type,surface erythema,lesion mucosa with ulceration and lesions with spontaneous bleeding were the risk factors of pathological diagnosis upgrading after ESD (F=5.37,6.44,4.56,7.56 and 7.78,respectively;all P＜0.01),odds ratio (OR) value and 95％ confidence interval (CI) were 4.086 (2.035 to 10.786),7.435 (2.845 to 19.862),3.205 (1.535 to 8.541),8.668 (3.365 to 21.457) and 7.056 (2.732 to 18.355).The age,gender and location of the lesion were not the risk factors.Conclusions Pathological upgrading is common in gastric lesions with LGIN after ESD.The lesions with high risk factors should be alerted and treated more actively.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the risk factors of pathological upgrading in gastric mucosal lesions with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).Methods From January 2010 to December 2016,the complete clinical data of 326 patients pathologically diagnosed with gastric LGIN lesions before ESD were retrospectively analyzed.Single factor analysis of variance and multiple factor Logistic regression analysis were performed to analyze the risk factors of pathological upgrading after ESD.Results A total of 326 patients with gastric LGIN lesions diagnosed by preoperative biopsy before ESD were enrolled.Among them the postoperative pathological diagnosis of 244 cases (74.85％) were still LGIN,while the postoperative pathological diagnosis of 82 cases (25.15 ％) were upgraded,of which 61 cases (18.71％) were upgraded to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and 21 (6.44％) were upgraded to gastric early cancer.The results of single and multiple factor analysis indicated that lesion size≥2.0 cm,deep depressed-type,surface erythema,lesion mucosa with ulceration and lesions with spontaneous bleeding were the risk factors of pathological diagnosis upgrading after ESD (F=5.37,6.44,4.56,7.56 and 7.78,respectively;all P＜0.01),odds ratio (OR) value and 95％ confidence interval (CI) were 4.086 (2.035 to 10.786),7.435 (2.845 to 19.862),3.205 (1.535 to 8.541),8.668 (3.365 to 21.457) and 7.056 (2.732 to 18.355).The age,gender and location of the lesion were not the risk factors.Conclusions Pathological upgrading is common in gastric lesions with LGIN after ESD.The lesions with high risk factors should be alerted and treated more actively.
RESUMO
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the potential predictive factors for carcinomatous transformation of gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIEN) on the basis of endoscopic features.Methods The study involved 312 gastric LGIENs that were histologically confirmed by endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) between May 2004 and September 2010,and then removed by endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection were enrolled in this study.According to EMR/ESD postoperative pathological findings,they were divided into LGIEN group and the HGIEN group,and compared their endoscopic characteristics.Results There were not significant different between the two group,as the mean age、gender the diameter of the lesions、lesion sites and surface nodularity.The diameter of the lesions was 14.6 ± 8.2 mm in the LGIEN group and 22.0 ± 0.55 mm in the HGIEN group (P ＜ 0.05).42 of 69 gastric adenomas (60.9％)larger than 20 mm in diameter showed HGIEN (P ＜ 0.05).Hyperemia and mucosal ulceration were significant differences in the two groups.Conclusion The LGIEN lesions with these endoscopic characteristics,such as size (＞ 2 cm),surface hyperemia,ulceration should be considered for EMR/ESD.
RESUMO
Objective: Epithelial dysplasia of the esophagus and gastric cardia is precancerous lesion, including mild, moderate and severe levels. In 2000 year, WHO recommended to replace dysplasia with intraepithelial neoplasia. Mild and moderate dysplasia were classified as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LIN). Cardia adenocarcinoma was suggested to be called esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma. The risk of cancer development and the rule of time evolution were detected in esophagus and esophageal-gastdc junction LIN in high incidence area of esophageal cancer in Northern China, in an effort to provide scientific data for the prevention of esophageal cancer. Methods: Between October 2001 and October 2002, two townships of Cixian were chosen to carry out endoscopic iodine staining screening cohort study. The total population aged 0-85 was 22,016, of which 6,596 aged 40-69 (3257 males and 3339 females). Except for thoese with contraindications and those who refused to join the study, 3,506 cases were finally recruited in the study, and the screening rate was 53.2%. According to WHO criteria of the pathological diagnosis, the esophageal squamous epithelium with mild and moderate dysplasia and esophageal-gastric junction with mild dysplasia were classified into LIN groups (including 616 cases). The control group contained a total of 2,478 cases without precancerous lesions and free of cancer in endoscopic screening. Results: From June to September in 2008, the cohort was followed up and 174 cases were lost, with a follow-up rate of 95.0%. Follow-up was 3,970.7 person- years in the LIN group and 16,120.0 person-years in the control group.Carcinomous conversion rates were 251.7 and 68.2/per 100,000 person- years respectively in the LIN group and the control group. The median time in the two groups was 38 and 47 months, respectively. Compared with that of the normal population, the relative risk (RR) of LIN was 3.69 (95% CI=1.57-8.69, P=0.001). Conclusion: Population with LIN are at high-risk for esophageal cancer and endoscopic examination every year is absolutely necessary.