Relationships of Total Lymphocyte Count and Subpopulation Lymphocyte Counts with the Nutritional Status in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis/Peritoneal Dialysis / 고신대학교의과대학학술지

OBJECTIVES: Dialysis patients' nutritional indicators are quite subjective and complex and cannot be easily measured in clinical settings. Based on previous reports that total lymphocyte count (TLC) and subpopulation lymphocyte counts (SLCs) are associated with nutritional status in patients with dialysis, we designed this study to examine the relationships of the TLC and SLCs with clinical outcome and nutritional status in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). METHODS: In this prospective, observational study, we enrolled 66 patients (50 HD patients and 16 PD patients) receiving stable maintenance dialysis. We evaluated the baseline parameters of height; weight; TLC; SLCs expressing CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD19; CBC; iron profile (iron, TIBC, ferritin); BUN; Cr; Na; K; total CO2; Ca; P; iPTH; protein; albumin; total cholesterol; HDL; LDL; uric acid and CRP and calculated Onodera's prognostic nutritional index (OPNI) and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) at baseline and three months. To analyze differences in the TLC and SLCs between the HD group and the PD group, we performed an independent samples t-test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to predict malnutrition in dialysis patients. In addition, to analyze changes in TLC, SLCs expressing each marker (CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD19) and other nutritional markers, we performed general linear model (GLM)-repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Mean age was 55.8 ± 12.7 years in HD paitents and 49.8 ± 14.5 years in PD patients. The duration of dialysis was 59.7 ± 52.9 months in HD patients and 66.1 ± 33.6 years in PD patients. Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients aged 60 years or older, women, and those whose CD19 SLCs were lower than 100 had a higher risk of developing malnutrition. In GLM-repeated measures ANOVA, CD19 SLCs were significantly higher in women and in patients with a shorter period of dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that GNRI, OPNI, TLC and SLCs (especially CD19 count) may be significant nutritional markers in HD and PD patients.

Characteristics of natural changes in CD4+lymphocyte counts among untreated HIV-infected patients in central districts of Shanghai / 上海预防医学

Objective Objective To explore the characteristics and determinants of natural chan-ges in CD4+lymphocyte counts among HIV -infected patients without previous antiviral therapy in two dis-tricts of Shanghai . [ Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on HIV -infected patients reported from 1987 through May 2013 in two districts of Shanghai , who had received at least twice CD 4+lymphocyte counting tests before antiretroviral treatment ( ART) .The characteristics of natural changes in CD 4+lympho-cyte count and the determinants of significant decrease in count were described . [ Results] A total of 365 patients were included in the study .The monthly rate of CD 4+lymphocyte count changes between the first and the last counting tests had a median of -4.4 (IQR:-11.1~0.2).Among them 263(72.1%) showed remarkable decrease in CD 4+lymphocyte counts and 143 ( 39 .2%) presented a significant decrease (≥30%).Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that the age , the first CD4+lymphocyte counts and the interval between the first and the last counting tests were significantly associated with the significant de -crease of CD4+lymphocyte counts among HIV-infected patients. [Conclusion] Natural changes of CD4+lymphocyte counts were gentle as a whole among untreated patients infected with HIV in central districts of Shanghai and rapid decrease in CD 4+lymphocyte counts among some HIV -infected patients was associated with many factors .It is held that CD 4+lymphocyte count and its changing rate should be regularly monitored so as to estimate the progress of the disease and perform targeted behavior intervention and clinic intervention .

Coinfección de hepatitis B y/o hepatitis C en pacientes infectados por virus de inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) / Hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C co-infection in patients infected by the human immunodefficiency virus (HIV)

La coinfección con los virus de hepatitis B (VHB) y/o hepatitis C (VHC) puede provocar complicaciones en el paciente VIH+. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la frecuencia de marcadores serológicos en la coinfección del VHB y/o VHC en plasmas de pacientes infectados por VIH y su correlación con el estatus virológico del VIH e inmunológico del paciente. Se evaluaron 1.846 plasmas positivos para VIH, referidos al Instituto Nacional de Higiene “Rafael Rangel” para la determinación de marcadores serológicos del VHB y VHC. Se realizaron análisis de carga viral del VIH-1 y recuento de linfocitos T CD4+/CD8+ para evaluar el estatus virológico e inmunológico, respectivamente de la población estudiada. La frecuencia de coinfección por VHB ó VHC fue de 15% y 5%, respectivamente mientras que la coinfección VHB/VHC fue de 0,16% (3/1.846) en pacientes infectados por VIH. No se observó asociación entre presencia de marcadores serológicos del VHB ó el VHC y bajos ó elevados niveles de ARN genómico del VIH (p=0,81 y p=0,31, respectivamente) ni valores bajos ó normales del índice CD4/CD8 (p=0,75 y p=0,06, respectivamente). Estos resultados sugieren que la coinfección con VHB o VHC no parece influir en los estatus virológico e inmunológico de la población evaluada.

Co-infection with hepatitis B (HBV) virus and/or hepatitis C (HCV) virus can induce complications in HIV+ patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of serologic markers in HBV and/ or HCV in plasma of HIV infected patients, and its correlation with the HIV viral status and the immunological status of the patient. The study included the evaluation of 1,846 HIV positive plasmas referred to the Instituto Nacional de Higiene “Rafael Rangel” for the determination of HBV and HCV serologic markers. The evaluation of the viral and immunological status was done by the analysis of the HIV-1 viral load and CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocyte counts, respectively, in the population studied. The frequency of HBV or HCV co-infection was 15% and 5%, respectively, while HBV/HCV co-infection was 0.16% (3/1,846) in HIV infected patients. There was no association between the presence of HBV or HCV serologic markers and low or normal values of the HIV genomic RNA (p=0.81 and p=0.31, respectively) nor low or normal values of the CD4/CD8 index (p=0.75 and p=0.06, respectively). These results suggest that HBV or HCV co-infection does not seem to influence the viral and immunological status of the evaluated population.

Evaluating total lymphocyte counts as a substitute for CD4 counts in the follow up of AIDS patients

This study evaluated total lymphocyte count (TLC) as a substitute marker for CD4+ cell counts to identify patients who need prophylaxis against opportunistic infection (CD4 < 200 cells/mm³) and patients with CD4 < 350 cells/mm³ (Brazilian threshold value of CD4 count to define AIDS). We evaluated TLC and CD4+ cells count of 1,174 HIV-infected patients, in Salvador, Brazil, from May 2003 to September 2004. CD4+ cell counts were performed by flow cytometry, and TLC was measured with an automated hematological counter. The mean CD4 count was 430 cells/mm³ (range: 4 to 2,531 cells/mm³). Mean TLC was 1,900 cells/mm³ (range: 300 to 6,200 cells/mm³). Using a threshold value of 1,000 cells/mm³ for TLC, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 77 percent for CD4 < 200 cells/mm³, but the sensitivity was only 29 percent, while the negative predictive value (NPV) was 88 percent, with 98 percent specificity. Similar findings were observed for CD4 count < 350. Using the same threshold value of 1,000 cells/mm³ for TLC, sensitivity was 14 percent, and specificity 99 percent (PPV= 94 percent; NPV=62 percent). In 70/1,510 (5 percent) of the samples the sum of CD4 and CD8 cell counts was greater than the TLC and in 27 percent (419/1,510) this sum was below 65 percent of the TLC. TLC has a high specificity to identify patients for prophylaxis, but a quite low sensitivity. It is not useful as an alternative to CD4+ T-cell counts as a marker in HIV-infected patients.