King Vision Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation for General Anaesthesia: A Comparative Study

With new advances in technology, intubation using video laryngoscopy has been gaining popularity, particularlyin patients with difficult airways or as rescue devices in failed intubation attempts. This study was done tocompare the effectiveness of King Vision video laryngoscope (KVL) and Macintosh laryngoscope whenperforming tracheal intubation under general anesthesia Eighty patients requiring endotracheal intubationduring general anaesthesia were randomly assigned into two groups to undergo tracheal intubation usingeither a King Vision video laryngoscope (n=40) or Macintosh laryngoscope (n=40). The primary outcomeswere the time of intubation and Cormack-Lehane grading and secondary outcomes were number of attemptsand optimisation manoeuvres required and complications related to laryngoscopy and intubation. King Visionvideo laryngoscope was found to be significantly better than the Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of Cormackand Lehane grading, requirement of optimisation manoeuvres and need of second attempt for intubationexcept time of intubation which was comparable between the two groups.

Comparative evaluation of hemodynamic responses and ease of intubation with airtraq video laryngoscope versus macintosh laryngoscope in patients with ischemic heart disease

Introduction: Hemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy can potentially precipitate ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. There are conflicting reports regarding the hemodynamic stress responses between the conventional Macintosh and video laryngoscopes. There is a paucity of studies regarding the same in cardiac surgical patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized control study to compare the hemodynamic responses and ease of intubation using Airtraq video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with ischemic heart disease. Results: Seventy patients were randomized into two groups. Baseline variables including age, weight, Mallampati score, and comorbidities were comparable between the two groups. There was statistically significant elevation in mean heart rate in the Macintosh group at 2nd-min (P = 0.02) and 3rd-min (P = 0.05) postintubation. Similarly, there was a significant increase in mean arterial pressure at 2nd (P = 0.06), 3rd (P = 0.03), and 4th (P = 0.03) in the Macintosh group. The time for laryngoscopy and Intubation Difficulty Scale was significantly better in the Airtraq group (P = 0.001 and 0.001). However, the median time to intubation was longer in the Airtraq group (13 s vs. 11 s, P = 0.05). Laryngoscopy view was better with Airtraq even in patients with Mallampati score 3 (ten patients). The incidence of trauma was same in both the groups. Conclusion: Airtraq provides the better hemodynamic stability and ease of intubation and may be considered superior to conventional Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation in patients with ischemic heart disease.

Comparison of Glottic View and Haemodynamic Stress Response Associated with Laryngoscopy using the Macintosh, McCoy and Miller Blades in Adult Patients

Introduction: Laryngoscopy induces haemodynamic responsewhich has implications for patients with cardiovascularillnesses. We devised this study to compare the laryngoscopicview of the glottis obtained with the Macintosh, McCoy andMiller blades, and corresponding haemodynamic changes.Material and Methods: 105 ASA grade I and II patientsrandomly divided into three groups were intubated usingMacintosh, McCoy and Miller blade respectively. Cormackand Lehane grade of glottic view obtained, heart rate, systolicand diastolic blood pressure at baseline, immediately beforeinduction, following induction, and at 1, 3 and 10 minutesafter intubation were noted. Epi Info 7.2 was used forstatistical analysis. Chi square and ANOVA tests were appliedto compare haemodynamic parameters.Results: 18 patients (51.4%) were CL grade I and 17 (48.6%)were CL grade II in Macintosh, 24 (68.6%) were CL gradeI and 11 (31.4%) were CL II in McCoy and, 32 (91.4%)were CL I and 3 (8.6%) were CL II in Miller group. Risein heart rate following intubation was greatest with Millerblade, followed by Macintosh and least with McCoy, andwas statistically significant (P< 0.01). Rise in both, systolicand diastolic blood pressure following intubation was highestwith the Miller blade, followed by Macintosh and least withMcCoy, and the difference compared with baseline values wasstatistically significant (P<0.01).Conclusions: Miller blade provides best visualization of larynxbut McCoy blade produced least haemodynamic response,hence the latter is preferable when less haemodynamicresponse is desired.

The role of videolaryngoscope in endotracheal intubation training programs / O papel do videolaringoscópio em programas de treinamento de intubação endotraqueal

Abstract Background Macintosh laryngoscopes are widely used for endotracheal intubation training of medical students and paramedics whereas there are studies in the literature that supports videolaryngoscopes are superior in endotracheal intubation training. Our aim is to compare the endotracheal intubation time and success rates of videolaryngoscopes and Macintosh laryngoscopes during endotracheal intubation training and to determine the endotracheal intubation performance of the students when they have to use an endotracheal intubation device other than they have used during their education. Methods Endotracheal intubation was performed on a human manikin owing a standard respiratory tract by Macintosh laryngoscopes and C-MAC® videolaryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttligen, Germany). Eighty paramedic students were randomly allocated to four groups. At the first week of the study 10 endotracheal intubation trials were performed where, Group-MM and Group-MV used Macintosh laryngoscopes; Group-VV and Group-VM used videolaryngoscopes. Four weeks later all groups performed another 10 endotracheal intubation trial where Macintosh laryngoscopes was used in Group-MM and Group-VM and videolaryngoscopes used in Group-VV and Group-MV. Results Success rates increased in the last 10 endotracheal intubation attempt in groups MM, VV and MV (p = 0.011; p = 0.021, p = 0.290 respectively) whereas a decrease was observed in group-VM (p = 0.008). Conclusions The success rate of endotracheal intubation decreases in paramedic students who used VL during endotracheal intubation education and had to use Macintosh laryngoscopes later. Therefore we believe that solely videolaryngoscopes is not enough in endotracheal intubation training programs.

Resumo Justificativa Os laringoscópios Macintosh são amplamente utilizados para o treinamento de estudantes de medicina e paramédicos em intubação endotraqueal; contudo, há mais estudos na literatura que apoiam os videolaringoscópios no treinamento de intubação endotraqueal. Nosso objetivo foi comparar o tempo de intubação endotraqueal e as taxas de sucesso de videolaringoscópios e laringoscópios Macintosh durante o treinamento de intubação endotraqueal e determinar o desempenho da intubação endotraqueal dos alunos quando precisam usar um dispositivo de intubação endotraqueal diferente daquele que usaram durante seu treinamento. Métodos A intubação endotraqueal foi realizada em modelo humano com trato respiratório padrão usando laringoscópios Macintosh e videolaringoscópio C-MAC® (Karl Storz, Tuttligen, Alemanha). Oitenta estudantes paramédicos foram randomicamente alocados em quatro grupos. Na primeira semana do estudo, 10 tentativas de intubação endotraqueal foram realizadas, nas quais o Grupo-MM e Grupo-MV utilizaram laringoscópios Macintosh e o Grupo-VV e Grupo-VM utilizaram videolaringoscópios. Quatro semanas depois, todos os grupos realizaram mais 10 tentativas de intubação endotraqueal, nas quais laringoscópios Macintosh foram utilizados pelo Grupo-MM e Grupo-VM e videolaringoscópios pelo Grupo VV e Grupo-MV. Resultados As taxas de sucesso aumentaram nas últimas 10 tentativas de intubação endotraqueal nos grupos MM, VV e MV (p = 0,011; p = 0,021, p = 0,290, respectivamente), enquanto uma redução foi observada no Grupo-VM (p = 0,008). Conclusões A taxa de sucesso da intubação endotraqueal diminuiu nos estudantes paramédicos que utilizaram VL durante o treinamento em intubação endotraqueal e precisaram usar laringoscópios Macintosh posteriormente. Portanto, acreditamos que o uso isolado de videolaringoscópios não é suficiente em programas de treinamento de intubação endotraqueal.

Comparison of domestic video intubationscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope in nasal intubation / 中国内镜杂志

Objective To compare the clinical effect of nasal intubation with domestic video intubationscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope. Methods One hundred patients scheduled for oro-maxillo-facial operation, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II, aged 19 ~ 67 years, were randomly divided into the domestic video intubationscope group (group V) and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope group (group M), with 50 cases in each group. Nasal intubation was respectively performed with domestic video intubationscope (Group V) and Macintosh direct laryngoscope (group M). Cormark-Lehane grade (C-L classification), tracheal intubation time, first-time intubation success rate and tracheal intubation complications were recorded.Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of before induction of anesthesia (T0), after induction of anesthesia (T1), at glottic exposure (T2), at intubation (T3), 1 min after intubation (T4) and 3 min after intubation (T5) were recorded. Results C-L classification in group V was significantly lower than that in group M (P < 0.05), intubation time in group V was significantly shorter than that in group M (P < 0.05), first-time intubation success rate in group V was significantly higher than that in group M (P < 0.05). Compared with T1, MAP was significantly higher at T3~ T4and HR was significantly faster at T3in group V, MAP was significantly higher at T2~ T4and HR was significantly faster at T2~ T3in group M (P < 0.05). Compared with group M, MAP and HR in group V were significantly lower at T2~ T4 (P < 0.05). The incidence of tracheal intubation complications in group V was significantly lower than that in group M (P < 0.05). Conclusions Compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscope,domestic video intubationscope in nasal intubation is better in glottic exposure,it could shorten tracheal intubation time ,increase first-time intubation success rate, maintain stable hemodynamics, has fewer tracheal intubation complications and is worthy of clinical application.

Comparison of application of videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in double-lumen endobronchial intubation / 临床麻醉学杂志

Objective To explore the application value of videolaryngoscope and Macintosh la ryngoscope in double-lumen endobronchial intubation.Methods Eighty patients (50 males,30 females,aged 18-70 years,ASA grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ) of both sexes,scheduled for thoracic surgery and double lumen endobronchial intubation were randomly divided into two groups using a random number table:videolaryngoscope group and Macintosh laryngoscope group.The intubation time,the success rate of intubation,the views of glottis,the hemodynamics during the first 4 minutes of intubation,the number of positive responses to intubation and the incidence of pharyngalgia at 24 h after the operation were observed and compared between the two groups,the condition of oral hemorrhage and the injury of the tracheal walls were recorded as well.Results Compared with videolaryngoscope group,the C-L grade and the success rate of the first intubation of Macintosh laryngoscope group was significantly higher,the intubation time of Macintosh laryngoscope group was significantly shor ter (P＜0.05).In addition,the positive cases of responses to intubation and the incidence of pharyngalgia at 24 h after the operation of Macintosh laryngoscope group were obviously less than those of videolaryngoscope group (P＜0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups of oral injury bleeding and the injury of tracheal wall and protuberance.At T2,T3,the two groups of MAP were significantly lower than that of T1,and the MAP of videolaryngoscope group was significantly lower than that of t Macintosh laryngoscope group at T2,T3 (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Compared with videolaryngoscope,Macintosh laryngoscope is more suitable for the doublelumen endobronchial intubation in patients predicted without difficulty in intubating.

Airtraq Video Laryngoscope for Nasotracheal Intubation in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Hyperpnoea Syndrome:Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial / 中国微创外科杂志

Objective To compare the effect of nasotracheal intubation between Airtraq video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and hyperpnoea syndrome(OSAHS). Methods A total of 60 patients with OSAHS receiving nasotracheal intubation were randomly divided into two groups: the group M was intubated with Macintosh laryngoscope and the group A was intubated with Airtraq video laryngoscope.The blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before induction(T0),before intubation(T1),immediately after intubation(T2),first minute(T3)and fifth minute(T4)after intubation. The intubation time,Cormach-Lehane scale,external laryngeal press,use of magil forceps and the incidence of blood on laryngoscope were recorded. Results The systolic pressure and heart rate at T 2,T3and T4were significantly higher than T1in the group M(P<0.05),but no significant changes were found among T 2,T3and T4in the group A(P>0.05).The systolic pressure was significantly different between the two groups at T 2and T3(P<0.05).The heart rate was significantly different between the two groups at T 2,T3 and T4(P<0.05).The diastolic pressure was not significantly different between the two groups(P >0.05).The laryngoscope exposure scale in the group A was significantly superior to the group M(Z=-4.935,P=0.000).The intubation time in the group A(30.4 ±9.0)s was significantly less than that in the group M[(42.3 ±16.5)s, t =-3.468, P =0.000]. Conclusion Nasotracheal intubation with Airtraq video laryngoscope has less influence on hemodynamics,shorter intubation time and easier performance as compared with Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with OSAHS.

Comparison of Truviewscope and C-Mac Video Laryngoscope with the Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope in Improving the Glottic View during Endotracheal Intubation

Background: In anesthetic practice, the introduction of multiple novel laryngoscopes has simplified visualization of the vocal cords and has reduced the complications arising due to difficult or failed tracheal intubation Both Truview scope and C-Mac video laryngoscope have been reported to provide a comparable or superior glottic view on comparison with conventional Macintosh laryngoscope Materials and methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted in 100 subjects scheduled for elective surgery equally divided into 2 groups Conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy was done initially in all subjects enrolled for the study For the Glottic view, One Group (n=50) underwent Truview laryngoscopy while the other (n=50) underwent C-Mac video laryngoscopy Results: The improvement in glottic view from original MCL (Modified Cormack & Lehane) grading obtained from Macintosh laryngoscope was 40% (n=23) in Truview compared to 46% (n=23) in CMac video laryngoscope while downgrading of view was observed in 10% (n=5) in group– T compared to none in C-Mac video laryngoscope There were no statistically significant difference in Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) scores between the groups (P = 0072) The mean duration of time R Vimal, A Sivanoli Comparison of Truviewscope and C-Mac Video Laryngoscope with the Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope in Improving the Glottic View during Endotracheal Intubation IAIM, 2018; 5(12): 125-133 Page 126 for endotracheal intubation with C-Mac video laryngoscope (2310 seconds) was significantly shorter compared with Truview laryngoscope (3126 seconds) Conclusions: There was an improvement in view of the glottis in both Truview and C-Mac video laryngoscope from the initial Macintosh laryngoscope view But C-Mac video laryngoscope offered better view improvement and also required a shorter time for intubation compared to Truview laryngoscope

A randomised comparative study of the effect of Airtraq optical laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope on intraocular pressure in non-ophthalmic surgery / Estudo comparativo randomizado do efeito do laringoscópio óptico Airtraq vs. laringoscópio Macintosh sobre a pressão intraocular em cirurgia não oftálmica

BACKGROUND: We compared intraocular pressure changes following laryngoscopy and intubation with conventional Macintosh blade and Airtraq optical laryngoscope. METHODS: Ninety adult patients were randomly assigned to study group or control group. Study group (n = 45) - Airtraq laryngoscope was used for laryngoscopy. Control group (n = 45) - conventional Macintosh laryngoscope was used for laryngoscopy. Preoperative baseline intraocular pressure was measured with Schiotz tonometer. Laryngoscopy was done as per group protocol. Intraocular pressure and haemodynamic parameters were recorded just before insertion of the device and subsequently three times at an interval of one minute after insertion of the device. RESULTS: Patient characteristics, baseline haemodynamic parameters and baseline intraocular pressure were comparable in the two groups. Following insertion of the endotracheal tube with Macintosh laryngoscope, there was statistically significant rise in heart rate and intraocular pressure compared to Airtraq group. There was no significant change in MAP. Eight patients in Macintosh group had tongue-lip-dental trauma during intubation, while only 2 patients received upper airway trauma in Airtraq group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that Airtraq laryngoscope in comparison to Macintosh laryngoscope results in significantly fewer rises in intraocular pressure and clinically less marked increase in haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

JUSTIFICATIVA: Comparar as alterações de pressão intraocular após laringoscopia e intubação com lâmina Macintosh convencional e laringoscópio óptico Airtraq. MÉTODOS: Noventa pacientes adultos foram randomicamente designados para os grupos estudo ou controle. No grupo estudo (n = 45) o laringoscópio Airtraq foi usado para laringoscopia e no grupo controle (n = 45) o laringoscópio Macintosh convencional foi usado para laringoscopia. A pressão intraocular foi mensurada no pré-operatório com tonômetro Schiotz. A laringoscopia foi feita de acordo com o protocolo de cada grupo. Pressão intraocular e parâmetros hemodinâmicos foram registrados logo antes da inserção do dispositivo e três vezes após a inserção do dispositivo, com intervalo de um minuto. RESULTADOS: As características dos pacientes, os parâmetros hemodinâmicos basais e a PIO basal foram comparáveis nos dois grupos. Após a inserção do tubo endotraqueal com o laringoscópio Macintosh, houve um aumento estatisticamente significativo da frequência cardíaca e da pressão intraocular em comparação com o grupo Airtraq. Não houve alteração significativa da PAM. Oito pacientes do grupo Macintosh sofreram trauma de língua-lábio-dental durante a intubação, enquanto apenas dois pacientes sofreram trauma das vias aéreas superiores no grupo Airtraq. CONCLUSÃO: Concluímos que o laringoscópio Airtraq, em comparação com o laringoscópio Macintosh, resultou em elevações significativamente menores da PIO e em aumentos clinicamente menos acentuados da resposta hemodinâmica à laringoscopia e intubação.

Comparison of tracheal intubations using video intubationscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilization / 中国内镜杂志

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the video intubationscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope in simulated cervical spine immobilization. Methods Sixty patients, ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ , between 19 and 68 years old, underwent general anesthesia requiring oro-tracheal intubation, were randomly assigned to undergo intubation using video intubationscope (group V) or Macintosh direct laryngoscope (group M), 30 cases in each. Each patient was provided mannal in-line axial stabilization of the head and neck by an experienced assistant. The following data were recorded and analyzed: glottic exposure time, Cormark-Lehane grade (C-L classification), tracheal intubation time, total intubation attempts, manoeuvre needed to aid tracheal intubation, failure for tracheal intubation, one-time success rate of tracheal intubation and total success rate of tracheal intubation, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) before induction of anesthesia, before intubation, at glottic exposure, at intubation, 1 and 3 min after intubation, and complications. Results Compared with group M, better glottic exposure view (C-L classification) was achieved in group V (P 0.05) and were significantly increased at T3~T5 (P < 0.05); compared with group M, MAP at T2~T4 in group V were significantly lower (P < 0.05). Compared with T1, HR in group V were no significantly changed at T2~T5, HR in group M were significantly increased at T2~T4 (P < 0.05), and significantly higher than that in group V at the same time point (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization, Video intubationscope could provide better view of glottic exposure, decrease the difficulty of intubation and increase the success rate of intubation, have less complications and influence on patient’s hemodynamics.

Impact of orotracheal intubation by Macintosh laryngoscopy versus Shikani optical stylet on blood pressure and heart rate / 实用医学杂志

Objective To compare the hemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation by Macintosh laryngoscopy (MAC) with Shikani optical stylet (SOS). Methods Forty neurosurgical patients, ASA physical status Ⅰ~Ⅲ, were prospectively randomized to MAC group (n = 20) and SOS group (n = 20) according to the method of orotracheal intubation. Heart rate (HR) and invasive systolic blood pressure (SBP) were recorded at pre- and post-intubation. Results The intubation time was significantly longer in SOS group than in MAC group [(22 ± 8) s vs. (17 ± 8) s, P < 0.05]. SBP in both groups decreased significantly after induction (P < 0.05) and increased greatly at 1 and 2 min post-intubation (P < 0.05), but did not differ at 3, 4 and 5 min. HR in both groups did not differ significantly between the SBP after induction. HR in both groups increased greatly at 1 and 2 min post-intubation (P < 0.05), but did not differ markedly at 3, 4 and 5 min after induction. There were no significant differences in the peak SBP and HR between the two groups. Conclusion MAC and SOS cause similar hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation.

A comparative study of overall efficacy and hemodynamic effects following blind oro-tracheal intubation with ILMA vs. conventional direct laryngoscopy guided intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope.

Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) is a new device to guide blind oro-tracheal intubation thus offering a new approach for endotracheal intubation and is expected to produce less sympathetically driven haemodynamic stress response. The purpose of this study was to assess overall efficacy, haemodynamic advantage and complication rate with use of ILMA compared to conventional method of endotracheal intubation with use of Macintosh Laryngoscope (ML). Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted on 60 adult patients comparable in age, sex, weight, MPC and ASA status scheduled for elective surgeries. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 30 each. Both the groups received similar balanced anaesthesia technique (Inj. fentanyl 2 μg/kg, propofol 2-2.5 mg/kg, rocuronium 1 mg/kg). Tracheal intubation was done using either ILMA or Macintosh laryngoscope. The intubation time, number of attempts required for successful intubation, haemodynamic changes and oro-pharyngo-laryngeal complications encountered during both the methods were recorded. Results: Time to intubation was comparatively longer in the ILMA group than laryngoscopy group (P <0.05). The success rate of intubation was 100% in both the groups. Overall haemodynamic changes in both the groups were statistically comparable (P >0.05) and ILMA appears to be offering no haemodynamic advantage over ML. The incidence of complications was rare and comparable amongst both the groups (P >0.05). Conclusions: Therefore in patients with normal airway blind intubation with ILMA is a successful and equally efficacious method without significant oro-pharyngo-laryngeal morbidity but offers no added haemodynamic advantage compared to conventional direct laryngoscopy with ML. Thus ILMA may act as a suitable alternative to ML for patients with normal airway.

A comparative study of tracheal intubation characteristics using Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscope.

Background: Direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation with the Macintosh blade is most commonly used for establishing a patent airway. AirtraqTm Optical Laryngoscope, does not require the alignment of the 3 airway axes for glottic visualization. Objective: We aim to compare these two laryngoscopes in view of laryngoscopic grading, ease of tracheal intubation and hemodynamic changes associated with laryngoscopy and intubation. Materials and Methods: 50 ASA I and II patients were randomly divided into Macintosh (M) group and Airtraq (A) group. Cormack Lehane grading, ease of intubation, laryngeal intubation time in secs and incidence of sore throat was noted. HR & BP was recorded at 0, 1, 3, 5 & 10 minutes following intubation. Unpaired ‘t’ test compared inter-group data, while paired ‘t’ test compared within group cardiovascular data. (p<0.05 statistically significant) Results: The demographic data of both groups were comparable. Cormack- Lehane grading was better in group A than in group M [grade I group A(84%) and group M(60%)]. The mean time for laryngeal intubation (Mean ± SD) for group A (8.3 ± 4.6 secs) and group M (20.46 ± 6.6 secs) (t = 7.6, p< 0.01). Ease of intubation was better in group A than group M. The rise in blood pressure and heart rate was significantly less in Group A as compared to Group M. Conclusion: Airtraq laryngoscope was superior to Macintosh laryngoscope as it provided better laryngoscopic views, shorter laryngoscopy and intubation time, easier intubation and the rise in heart rate and systolic blood pressure was significantly less.

Observation of swallowing pain with disposcope endoscope in patients with difficult visible glottis / 实用医学杂志

Objective To observe the influence of post-operative swallowing painwith Disposcope endoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with difficult visible glottis. Methods Thirty-six patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia whose glottis was not visible underMacintosh laryngoscope (according to Cormach-Lehane Grading of laryngoscopic view) were randomized into 2 groups (n = 18 each):Disposcope endoscope group (group D) and Macintosh laryngoscope group (group M). The rate of glottis exposure and successful intubation, swallowing pain at 30 min, 1, 3 d after extubation were observed. Results Compared with group M , the successful rate of glottis exposure and first intubation was significantly higher than thatin group D (P < 0.05). Swallowing pain VAS was higher in group M than in group D at 1d afterextubation (P < 0.05). Conclusions Compared with Macintosh laryngoscope , Disposcope endoscope in patients with difficult visible glottis could induce higher successful rate of glottis exposure and first intubation , shorter time of intubation and lower VAS of swallowing pain at 1d after extubation.

Comparison of students' learning curves between Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq laryngoscope in endotracheal intubation / 中华医学教育探索杂志

Objective To compare medical students' learning curve between Macintosh laryngoscope and optical laryngoscope in endotracheal intubation and to decide which one is more suitable for novice personnel.Methods Totally 26 interns after being trained by experienced anesthesiologists were enrolled in this study.They performed intubation on 6 patients by using both Macintosh laryngoscope and optical laryngoscope ( each laryngoscope for 3 patients) under the supervision of experienced anesthesiologists.The sequence of laryngoscope was determined by computer-generated random number list.Results Totally 149 patients who were ready to receive surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized crossover controlled study.Duration of intubation was significantly shorter in Airtraq group (78 -± 33 ) s than in Macintosh group (114 ± 32) s,P ＜ 0.001.Intubation success rate was significantly higher in Airtraq group than in Macintosh group ( 87.8％ vs.66.7％,P ＜ 0.05 ).Conclusions With the advantages of rapid learning curve,higher intubation success rate and shorter intubation duration,Airtraq laryngoscope is easier to master for novice personnel.

Comparison of the Pentax AWS and the Glidescope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with Mallampati classification I or II

BACKGROUND: The Pentax AWS and the Glidescope are new intubating devices.They were designed to provide a view of the glottis without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pentax AWS and the Glidescope in comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope, when performing tracheal intubation in patients with mallampati classification I or II. METHODS: Ninety patients presenting for surgery requiring tracheal intubation, and who were deemed easy for tracheal intubation of mallampati classification I or II were randomly assigned to undergo intubation using a Macintosh (Group M, n = 30), Pentax AWS (Group P, n = 30) or Glidescope (Group G, n = 30). Time to complete tracheal intubation and number of attempts until successful intubation were recorded. Noninvasive blood pressure and heart rate recorded before induction (PI), just before intubation (PT), 1 min and 5 min after intubation. Patients were assessed for postoperative sore throat at 6-12 h after surgery. RESULTS: Time to secure the airway with the Macintosh 13.0 (min 7, max 23.0) s was lesser than with the Pentax AWS 20.4 (8, 51.2) s and Glidescope 22.1 (10, 42.0) s. There were no significant differences in the rate of successful intubations and sore throat among the groups. There were significant increases in both mean arterial pressure and heart rate 1 min after intubation in all groups compare with PI. CONCLUSIONS: The Pentax AWS and the Glidescope had no specific advantage over the Macintosh laryngoscope for the patients with normal airway.

A comparative study on the usefulness of the Glidescope or Macintosh laryngoscope when intubating normal airways / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: The Glidescope Videolaryngoscope (GVL) is a newly developed video laryngoscope. It offers a significantly improved laryngeal view and facilitates endotracheal intubation in difficult airways, but it is controversial in that it offers an improved laryngeal view in normal airways as well. And the price of GVL is expensive. We hypothesized that intubation carried out by fully experienced anesthesiologists using the GVL with appropriate pre-anesthetic preparations offers an improved laryngeal view and shortened intubation time in normal airways. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the GVL with the Macintosh laryngoscope in normal airways and to determine whether GVL can substitute the Macintosh laryngoscope. METHODS: This study included 60 patients with an ASA physical status of class 1 or 2 requiring tracheal intubation for elective surgery. All patients were randomly allocated into two groups, GVL (group G) or Macintosh (group M). ADS (airway difficulty score) was recorded before induction of anesthesia. The anesthesiologist scored vocal cord visualization using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) visible and the subjective ease of intubation on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The time required to intubate was recorded by an assistant. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in POGO when using the GVL (P < 0.05). However, there was no difference in the time required for a successful tracheal intubation using the GVL compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. The VAS score on the ease of intubation was significantly lower for the GVL than for the Macintosh laryngoscope (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: GVL could be a first-line tool in normal airways.

Application of Shikani optical stylet to orotracheal intubation in critically conscious patients / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective To investigate the practical value of Shikani optical stylet used for orotracheal intubation in critically conscious patients and to evaluate the successful rate. Method A total of 48 conscious patients with severe respiratory failure were selected from January 2008 to June 2009. Of them, there were 31 males and 17 females,aging 21-86 years old with an average of 57 years old. All enrolled patients needed endotracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation support, and they were assigned to Shikani group (group S, n = 25) and Macintosh group (group M, n = 23) according to the odd and even number of date of admission to this study. The time consumed for intubation, the number of failure in intubation, the adverse effects or complications such as hemodynam-ic changes, injury to the pharyngo-oral cavity, choking and breath-hold were observed and recorded. The rank test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results The ratio of the successful intubation at first attempt was much higher in group S (96.0%) than that in group M (60.9%) (P <0.01). Compared with group M, the time consumed for intubation was significantly shortened, the cardiovascular reactions were much mild, and the incidence of injury to pharyngo-oral cavity, choking and breath-hold were less in the group S ( P < 0.01 all). Conclusions For the acute and critical patients, especially the conscious ones, orotracheal intubation with the Shikani optical stylet is rapid, successful, safe and less injurious, resulting in mild cardiovascular reactions.

Comparison between Truview™ EVO2 optic laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients receiving cervical vertebral surgery / 第二军医大学学报

Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of Truview™ EVO2 optic laryngoscope by comparing it with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients receiving cervical vertebral surgery. Methods: One hundred patients scheduled for elective cervical vertebral surgery were enrolled in this randomized crossover study. After induction, the patients' glottis in group A (n=50) was displayed by Macintosh laryngoscope and the Cormack-Lehane (C/L) grade was recorded, and then optic laryngoscope was employed to display the laryngeal structure. The order of laryngoscopy attempts was reversed in group B (n=50). Parameters recorded included demographics,airway assessment features (BMI, thyromental distance, mandibular size, mouth opening, mallampati oropharyngeal scale,and neck movement), C/L grade, laryngoscopic force applied, duration of intubation, difficulties of laryngeal view and injury of upper airway. Results: There were no significant difference in demographics, airway assessment features,C/L grade and duration of intubation between the 2 groups,whereas the laryngoscopic force in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (P < 0.05). The C/L grade obtained with optic laryngoscope was 69:26:5 (I:II:III),which was significantly better than that with Macintosh laryngoscope (26:46:28,P<0.001). A poor laryngeal view of 5% was obtained with optic laryngoscope,which was significantly better than that with Macintosh laryngoscope (28%, P<0.001). There was significant association between airway assessment features and C/L grade or laryngoscopic force (P<0.05). Conclusion: The Truview™ EVO2 optic laryngoscope has better glottic view and lighter laryngoscopic force than those of Macintosh laryngoscope,and may have potential advantages for managing the difficult airways for cervical vertebral surgery.

Hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation: A comparison between Truview™ EVO2 optic laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope / 第二军医大学学报

Objective: To compare the hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation between Truview™ EVO2 optic laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope. Methods: Eighty adult patients (ASA physical status I-II, aged 18-65 years) scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=40 each): T group and M group. After standard intravenous anesthetic induction, orotracheal intubation was performed with Truview™ EVO2 optic laryngoscope or Macintosh direct laryngoscope. Non-invasive heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and SpO2 were recorded before(T0) and after anesthetic induction (T1), at intubation (T2), 1 minutes (T3), 3 minutes (T4) and 5 minute after intubation (T5). The laryngeal exposure period and intubation period were also recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 13.0. Results: Except for HR at intubation (T2), there was no significant difference in the hemodynamic data at any other time points between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the laryngeal exposure period between the two groups. The intubation time in the T group was significantly longer than that in the M group (P< 0.05), but no more than 60 seconds. Conclusion: The hemodynamic responses produced by orotracheal intubation are similar between Truview™ EVO2 optic laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope.