RESUMO
Objective To investigate the effect of the timing of pronase on the quality of magnetically controlled gastric capsule endoscope(MCE).Methods 225 patients from February 2021 to March 2022 were randomly assigned to 3 groups,40 000 u of oral pronase 40 min before examination in Group A,20 000 u of oral pronase for 60 and 40 min before the examination in Group B,20 000 u of oral pronase for 40 and 20 min before examination in Group C.Gastric cavity cleanliness and gastric mucosa visualisation scores(1 to 4)were recorded for the six regions of the stomach and the sum of the scores was calculated.The detection rate of gastric lesions such as gastric polyps and the time of gastric examination were also recorded.Results 221 patients completed the study.In the mucosal visualization score,group C scored(23.56±1.37)points,which was higher than that in group A's(22.56±1.28)points and group B's(23.00±1.33)points.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In the gastric cavity cleanliness score,group C scored(21.44±2.35)points,which was higher than that in group A's(20.11±2.04)points.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).In the total score of cleanliness and mucosal visualization score of the proximal stomach(cardia and fundus),group C was higher than group A and group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In the detection rate of lesions,the detection rates of gastric polyps and erosion in group C were 17.8%and 49.3%,respectively,which were higher than group A's(6.8%and 29.7%)and group B's(9.5%and 31.1%).The differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The gastric observation time in group C was shorter than that in group A and group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions Oral administration of 20 000 u of pronase in divided doses 40 and 20 min before the examination can enhance the quality of magnetically controlled gastric capsule endoscope.
RESUMO
Objective:To investigate the effect and feasibility of swallowing intervention on esophageal examination by magnetically controlled gastric capsule endoscope (MCE), and to provide theoretical evidence for clinical application.Methods:From January 2021 to May 2022, 196 subjects who underwent MCE examination at West China Hospital, Sichuan University were prospectively enrolled. According to the swallowing action during MCE procedure, the subjects were divided into routine examination control group and swallowing-controlled intervention group with 98 cases in each group. The data of gender, age, history of smoking and drinking, body mass index, clinical symptoms (abdominal pain or abdominal distension, hematochezia, melena or positive fecal occult-bloodtest), esophageal transit time of MCE and detection rate of esophageal lesions were compared between the 2 groups. Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis.Results:There were no significant differences in age, gender, smoking history, drinking history, body mass index, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, and indication of MCE examination between the routine examination control group and swallowing-controlled intervention group (all P>0.05). All the subjects successfully completed the examination, and the capsules were excreted from the body. The median esophageal transit time of swallowing-controlled intervention group was longer than that of the routine examination control group (44.50 s (26.75 s, 101.25 s) vs. 11.00 s (5.00 s, 29.00 s)), and the difference was statistically significant ( Z=-8.13, P<0.001). The esophageal transit time of the patients aged 40 to 59 years old was longer than that of the patients aged <40 years old, but shorter than that of the patients aged ≥60 years old (54.00 s (36.25 s, 64.75 s) vs. 28.00 s (23.00 s, 35.00 s) and 69.50 s (64.75 s, 73.00 s)), and the differences were statistically significant ( Z=-6.72 and -6.91, both P<0.001). The detection rate of esophageal lesions of swallowing-controlled intervention group was higher than that of routine examination control group (22.4%, 22/98 vs. 11.2%, 11/98), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=4.41, P=0.036). Conclusion:Command-controlled swallowing can effectively prolong the time of esophagus examination by MCE, and improve the detection rate of esophageal lesions by MCE.