Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 611-614, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-755497

RESUMO

Objective To review the clinical characteristics of urethral prolapse in female children and summarize our experience of treatment.Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics of 102 patients with urethral prolapse from January 2007 to December 2017 was conducted at The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine.The age of the patients ranged from 8-156 months with an median of 80 months.The presenting symptoms in the 102 girls were:bleeding in 57 patients (55.9%),mass in 31 patients (30.4%),and dysuria/urinary frequency,urgent and pain in 14 patients (13.4%).In all,58 patients were managed conservatively with Sitz baths as their masses were small,39 underwent prolapse reduction under topical anesthesia and Sitz baths because their mass were large,and 5 patients were treated by excision of the prolapsed urethral mucosa with four-quadrant excisional technique because thrombosed urethral prolapse at first visit.Results A total of 89 patients were cured after conservative treatment (87.3%),8 patients were converted to surgical treatment because frequent recurrence with conservative treatment.No urethral stricture,active hemorrhage and recurrent were found in 13 patients after operation.Conclusions The most common clinical manifestations of urethral prolapse are urethral mass and bleeding.Most patients can be cured by conservative treatment.The patients whose symptoms were severe or suffered from frequent recurrence of urethral prolapse should be managed with surgical excision.

2.
Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery ; (6): 29-32, 2017.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-508242

RESUMO

Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids ( PPH) for treatment of rectal mucosa prolapse.Methods The 100 patients who suffered from rectal mucosa prolapse and were planning to take surgical treatment for the first time in our hospital from June 2013 to June 2015 were randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group .Patients in the treatment group(n=50) underwent PPH while patients in the control group (n=50) underwent traditional simplified mucosal plication technique .To observe the therapeutic effect of the two groups ,the average operation time ,average length of stay in hospital ,postoperative pain within 72 hours,postoperative anal function and postoperative complications of the two groups .Results There was no significant difference in the over-all treatment effect between the two groups(P>0.05).The average operation time, average length of stay in hospital,postoperative pain with-in 72 hours and postoperative anal function of the treatment group were lower than those of the control group ,and the differences were significant (P0.05).Conclusion Compare to the traditional simplified mucosal plication technique ,PPH technique has more advantages such as shorter operation time ,less anguish of patients,less complication,shorter hospitalization time,and higher security, which indicates PPH could become the preferred method for treatment of rectal mucosa prolapse .

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA