Comparison of the Birth Statistics between Multi-cultural and Korean Families in Korea (2015)

Since 2002, the number of marriages, births, and family members among multi-cultural families (MCFs) has increased. Beginning in 2006, the government initiated a planned management for such families and has implemented the MCF policy basic plan since 2010. In 2015, with multiple socio-economic and medical support initiatives for MCF being available, we analyzed the statistics for several factors related to birth, to determine whether there are significant adverse birth outcomes in MCF. We analyzed the birth data of MCFs in 2015, from Statistics Korea. This study compared the birth data of MCF and Korean families (KF) by geography, neonatal birth weight (BW), gestational age (GA), birth order of the neonates, place of delivery, cohabitation period of parents before the first child, and parental education level. The distribution of BW and the prevalence of low BW (< 2,500 g) or very low BW (< 1,500 g) were similar between both groups. The incidence of preterm birth was lower in the MCF group (6.5% vs. 7.0%, P = 0.015) than in the KF group. In the MCF group, parental education level was lower, and incidence of out-of-hospital births was higher than that of the KF group. Adverse birth outcomes, such as preterm birth and low BW in MCF are similar or better than KF. This study could be a good basis to present the status of MCF birth and newborn care in 2015.

The Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients in the Multi-Cultural Mental Health Clinic / 신경정신의학

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated changes in the clinical characteristics of foreign patients receiving psychiatric treatment in a public mental hospital in Seoul over the last nine years. METHODS: We compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of a multi-cultural mental health (MCMH) clinic group of 49 foreign psychiatric patients, who had attended the newly opened special clinic for foreigners during the period August 2009-2010, with those of a general group of 71 foreign psychiatric patients, who had been treated in conventional ways during the period 2002-July 2009. RESULTS: The MCMH clinic group was characterized by voluntary attendances with the assistance of family, friends or supporting organizations. The patients were more likely to have resided longer in Korea, to have Korean citizenship, to be young married immigrant women and to have children. They were also more able to communicate by themselves or with the support of bilingual interpreters and were more likely to receive outpatient-based treatment and to experience longer periods of treatment. In contrast, the general group was characterized by involuntary hospital attendances supported by the police or the embassies of their home countries, and patients received inpatient services. They were also discharged sooner to be sent back to their home countries. Depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and adjustment disorder were more common in the MCMH clinic group, while schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and a past history of psychiatric disorders were more common in general group. In the MCMH clinic group, those patients with Korean citizenship or permanent residency seemed to maintain consistent and stable treatment with a good prognosis. CONCLUSION: The findings from the specialized multi-cultural mental health clinic suggest that specialized setting for foreigners is more efficient in helping them, particularly for married immigrant women. This means that specialized systematic evaluation and treatment approach needs to be developed to provide culturally relevant mental health services for foreigners living in Korea.